United States Announces World Police Force

"...progressive controlled disarmament and continuously developing principles and procedures of international law would proceed to a point where no state would have the military power to challenge..."

"The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition..."

America the Battlefield
by Timothy A. Pope
May 15, 2015

INTRODUCTION

The revolutionary development of modern weapons within a world divided by serious ideological differences has produced a crisis in human history. In order to overcome the danger of nuclear war now confronting mankind, the United States has introduced at the Sixteenth General Assembly of the United Nations a Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World.

This new program provides for the progressive reduction of the war-making capabilities of nations and the simultaneous strengthening of international institutions to settle disputes and maintain the peace. It sets forth a series of comprehensive measures which can and should be taken in order to bring about a world in which there will be freedom from war and security for all states. It is based on three principles deemed essential to the achievement of practical progress in the disarmament field:

First, there must be immediate disarmament action:

A strenuous and uninterrupted effort must be made toward the goal of general and complete disarmament; at the same time, it is important that specific measures be put into effect as soon as possible.

Second, all disarmament obligations must be subject to effective international controls:

The control organization must have the manpower, facilities, and effectiveness to assure that limitations or reductions take place as agreed. It must also be able to certify to all states that retained forces and armaments do not exceed those permitted at any stage of the disarmament process.

Third, adequate peace-keeping machinery must be established:

There is an inseparable relationship between the scaling down of national armaments on the one hand and the building up of international peace-keeping machinery and institutions on the other. Nations are unlikely to shed their means of self-protection in the absence of alternative ways to safeguard their legitimate interests. This can only be achieved through the progressive strengthening of international institutions under the United Nations and by creating a United Nations Peace Force to enforce the peace as the disarmament process proceeds.

---

There follows a summary of the principal provisions of the United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World. The full text of the program is contained in an appendix to this pamphlet.

SUMMARY

DISARMAMENT GOAL AND OBJECTIVES

The over-all goal of the United States is a free, secure, and peaceful world of independent states adhering to common standards of justice and international conduct and subjecting the use of force to the rule of law; a world which has achieved general and complete disarmament under effective international control; and a world in which adjustment to change takes place in accordance with the principles of the United Nations.
In order to make possible the achievement of that goal, the program sets forth the following specific objectives toward which nations should direct their efforts:

• The disbanding of all national armed forces and the prohibition of their reestablishment in any form whatsoever other than those required to preserve internal order and for contributions to a United Nations Peace Force;
• The elimination from national arsenals of all armaments, including all weapons of mass destruction and the means for their delivery, other than those required for a United Nations Peace Force and for maintaining internal order;
• The institution of effective means for the enforcement of international agreements, for the settlement of disputes, and for the maintenance of peace in accordance with the principles of the United Nations; 
• The establishment and effective operation of an International Disarmament Organization within the framework of the United Nations to insure compliance at all times with all disarmament obligations.

TASK OF NEGOTIATING STATES

The negotiating states are called upon to develop the program into a detailed plan for general and complete disarmament and to continue their efforts without interruption until the whole program has been achieved. To this end, they are to seek the widest possible area of agreement at the earliest possible date. At the same time, and without prejudice to progress on the disarmament program, they are to seek agreement on those immediate measures that would contribute to the common security of nations and that could facilitate and form part of the total program.

GOVERNING PRINCIPLES

The program sets forth a series of general principles to guide the negotiating states in their work. These make clear that:

• As states relinquish their arms, the United Nations must be progressively strengthened in order to improve its capacity to assure international security and the peaceful settlement of disputes;
• Disarmament must proceed as rapidly as possible, until it is completed, in stages containing balanced, phased, and safeguarded measures;
• Each measure and stage should be carried out in an agreed period of time, with transition from one stage to the next to take place as soon as all measures in the preceding stage have been carried out and verified and as soon as necessary arrangements for verification of the next stage have been made;
• Inspection and verification must establish both that nations carry out scheduled limitations or reductions and that they do not retain armed forces and armaments in excess of those permitted at any stage of the disarmament process; and
• Disarmament must take place in a manner that will not affect adversely the security of any state.

DISARMAMENT STAGES 

The program provides for progressive disarmament steps to take place in three stages and for the simultaneous strengthening of international institutions.

FIRST STAGE

The first stage contains measures which would significantly reduce the capabilities of nations to wage aggressive war. Implementation of this stage would mean that:

• The nuclear threat would be reduced:
     All states would have adhered to a treaty effectively prohibiting the testing of nuclear weapons.
     The production of fissionable materials for use in weapons would be stopped and quantities of such materials from past production would be converted to non-weapons uses.
     States owning nuclear weapons would not relinquish control of such weapons to any nation not owning them and would not transmit to any such nation information or material necessary for their manufacture.
      States not owning nuclear weapons would not manufacture them or attempt to obtain control of such weapons belonging to other states.
     A Commission of Experts would be established to report on the feasibility and means for the verified reduction and eventual elimination of nuclear weapons stockpiles.
• Strategic delivery vehicles would be reduced:
     Strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles of specified categories and weapons designed to counter such vehicles would be reduced to agreed levels by equitable and balanced steps; their production would be discontinued or limited; their testing would be limited or halted.
• Arms and armed forces would be reduced:
     The armed forces of the United States and the Soviet Union would be limited to 2.1 million men each (with appropriate levels not exceeding that amount for other militarily significant states); levels of armaments would be correspondingly reduced and their production would be limited.
     An Experts Commission would be established to examine and report on the feasibility and means of accomplishing verifiable reduction and eventual elimination of all chemical, biological and radiological weapons.
• Peaceful use of outer space would be promoted:
     The placing in orbit or stationing in outer space of weapons capable of producing mass destruction would be prohibited.
     States would give advance notification of space vehicle and missile launchings.
• U.N. peace-keeping powers would be strengthened:
     Measures would be taken to develop and strengthen United Nations arrangements for arbitration, for the development of international law, and for the establishment in Stage II of a permanent U.N. Peace Force.
• An International Disarmament Organization would be established for effective verification of the disarmament program:
     Its functions would be expanded progressively as disarmament proceeds.
     It would certify to all states that agreed reductions have taken place and that retained forces and armaments do not exceed permitted levels.
     It would determine the transition from one stage to the next.
• States would be committed to other measures to reduce international tension and to protect against the chance of war by accident, miscalculation, or surprise attack:
     States would be committed to refrain from the threat or use of any type of armed force contrary to the principles of the U.N. Charter and to refrain from indirect aggression and subversion against any country.
     A U.N. peace observation group would be available to investigate any situation which might constitute a threat to or breach of the peace.
     States would be committed to give advance notice of major military movements which might cause alarm; observation posts would be established to report on concentrations and movements of military forces.

SECOND STAGE

The second stage contains a series of measures which would bring within sight a world in which there would be freedom from war. Implementation of all measures in the second stage would mean:

• Further substantial reductions in the armed forces, armaments, and military establishments of states, including strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles and countering weapons;
• Further development of methods for the peaceful settlement of disputes under the United Nations;
• Establishment of a permanent international peace force within the United Nations;
• Depending on the findings of an Experts Commission, a halt in the production of chemical, bacteriological and radiological weapons and a reduction of existing stocks or their conversion to peaceful uses;
• On the basis of the findings of an Experts Commission, a reduction of stocks of nuclear weapons;
• The dismantling or the conversion to peaceful uses of certain military bases and facilities wherever located; and
• The strengthening and enlargement of the International Disarmament Organization to enable it to verify the steps taken in Stage II and to determine the transition to Stage III.

THIRD STAGE

During the third stage of the program, the states of the world, building on the experience and confidence gained in successfully implementing the measures of the first two stages, would take final steps toward the goal of a world in which:

• States would retain only those forces, non-nuclear armaments, and establishments required for the purpose of maintaining internal order; they would also support and provide agreed manpower for a U.N. Peace Force.
• The U.N. Peace Force, equipped with agreed types and quantities of armaments, would be fully functioning.
• The manufacture of armaments would be prohibited except for those of agreed types and quantities to be used by the U.N. Peace Force and those required to maintain internal order. All other armaments would be destroyed or converted to peaceful purposes.
• The peace-keeping capabilities of the United Nations would be sufficiently strong and the obligations of all states under such arrangements sufficiently far-reaching as to assure peace and the just settlement of differences in a disarmed world.

Appendix

DECLARATION ON DISARMAMENT

THE UNITED STATES PROGRAM
FOR GENERAL AND COMPLETE DISARMAMENT
IN A PEACEFUL WORLD

The Nations of the world,
Conscious of the crisis in human history produced by the revolutionary development of modern weapons within a world divided by serious ideological differences;
Determined to save present and succeeding generations from the scourge of war and the dangers and burdens of the arms race and to create conditions in which all peoples can strive freely and peacefully to fulfill their basic aspirations;
Declare their goal to be: A free, secure, and peaceful world of independent states adhering to common standards of justice and international conduct and subjecting the use of force to the rule of law; a world where adjustment to change takes place in accordance with the principles of the United Nations; a world where there shall be a permanent state of general and complete disarmament under effective international control and where the resources of nations shall be devoted to man's material, cultural, and spiritual advance;
Set forth as the objectives of a program of general and complete disarmament in a peaceful world:
(a) The disbanding of all national armed forces and the prohibition of their reestablishment in any form whatsoever other than those required to preserve internal order and for contributions to a United Nations Peace Force;
(b) The elimination from national arsenals of all armaments, including all weapons of mass destruction and the means for their delivery, other than those required for a United Nations Peace Force and for maintaining internal order;
(c) The establishment and effective operation of an International Disarmament Organization within the framework of the United Nations to ensure compliance at all times with all disarmament obligations;
(d) The institution of effective means for the enforcement of international agreements, for the settlement of disputes, and for the maintenance of peace in accordance with the principles of the United Nations.
Call on the negotiating states:
(a) To develop the outline program set forth below into an agreed plan for general and complete disarmament and to continue their efforts without interruption until the whole program has been achieved;
(b) To this end to seek to attain the widest possible area of agreement at the earliest possible date;
(c) Also to seek --- without prejudice to progress on the disarmament program --- agreement on those immediate measures that would contribute to the common security of nations and that could facilitate and form a part of that program.
Affirm that disarmament negotiations should be guided by the following principles:
(a) Disarmament shall take place as rapidly as possible until it is completed in stages containing balanced, phased and safeguarded measures, with each measure and stage to be carried out in an agreed period of time.
(b) Compliance with all disarmament obligations shall be effectively verified from their entry into force. Verification arrangements shall be instituted progressively and in such a manner as to verify not only that agreed limitations or reductions take place but also that retained armed forces and armaments do not exceed agreed levels at any stage.
(c) Disarmament shall take place in a manner that will not affect adversely the security of any state, whether or not a party to an international agreement or treaty.
(d) As states relinquish their arms, the United Nations shall be progressively strengthened in order to improve its capacity to assure international security and the peaceful settlement of differences as well as to facilitate the development of international cooperation in common tasks for the benefit of mankind.
(e) Transition from one stage of disarmament to the next shall take place as soon as all the measures in the preceding stage have been carried out and effective verification is continuing and as soon as the arrangements that have been agreed to be necessary for the next stage have been instituted.
Agree upon the following outline program for achieving general and complete disarmament:

STAGE I 

A. To Establish an International Disarmament Organization:
(a) An International Disarmament Organization (IDO) shall be established within the framework of the United Nations upon entry into force of the agreement. Its functions shall be expanded progressively as required for the effective verification of the disarmament program.
(b) The IDO shall have: (1) a General Conference of all the parties; (2) a Commission consisting of representatives of all the major powers as permanent members and certain other states on a rotating basis; and (3) an Administrator who will administer the Organization subject to the direction of the Commission and who will have the authority, staff, and finances adequate to assure effective impartial implementation of the functions of the Organization.
(c) The IDO shall: (1) ensure compliance with the obligations undertaken by verifying the execution of measures agreed upon; (2) assist the states in developing the details of agreed further verification and disarmament measures; (3) provide for the establishment of such bodies as may be necessary for working out the details of further measures provided for in the program and for such other expert study groups as may be required to give continuous study to the problems of disarmament; (4) receive reports on the progress of disarmament and verification arrangements and determine the transition from one stage to the next.

B. To Reduce Armed Forces and Armaments:
(a) Force levels shall be limited to 2.1 million each for the U.S. and U.S.S.R. and to appropriate levels not exceeding 2.1 million each for all other militarily significant states. Reductions to the agreed levels will proceed by equitable, proportionate, and verified steps.
(b) Levels of armaments of prescribed types shall be reduced by equitable and balanced steps. The reductions shall be accomplished by transfers of armaments to depots supervised by the IDO. When, at specified periods during the Stage I reduction process, the states party to the agreement have agreed that the armaments and armed forces are at prescribed levels, the armaments in depots shall be destroyed or converted to peaceful uses.
(c) The production of agreed types of armaments shall be limited.
(d) A Chemical, Biological, Radiological (CBR) Experts Commission shall be established within the IDO for the purpose of examining and reporting on the feasibility and means for accomplishing the verifiable reduction and eventual elimination of CBR weapons stockpiles and the halting of their production.

C. To Contain and Reduce the Nuclear Threat:
(a) States that have not acceded to a treaty effectively prohibiting the testing of nuclear weapons shall do so.
(b) The production of fissionable materials for use in weapons shall be stopped.
(c) Upon the cessation of production of fissionable materials for use in weapons, agreed initial quantities of fissionable materials from past production shall be transferred to non-weapons purposes.
(d) Any fissionable materials transferred between countries for peaceful uses of nuclear energy shall be subject to appropriate safeguards to be developed in agreement with the IAEA.
(e) States owning nuclear weapons shall not relinquish control of such weapons to any nation not owning them and shall not transmit to any such nation information or material necessary for their manufacture. States not owning nuclear weapons shall not manufacture such weapons, attempt to obtain control of such weapons belonging to other states, or seek or receive information or materials necessary for their manufacture.
(f) A Nuclear Experts Commission consisting of representatives of the nuclear states shall be established within the IDO for the purpose of examining and reporting on the feasibility and means for accomplishing the verified reduction and eventual elimination of nuclear weapons stockpiles.

D. To Reduce Strategic Nuclear Weapons Delivery Vehicles:
(a) Strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles in specified categories and agreed types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be reduced to agreed levels by equitable and balanced steps. The reduction shall be accomplished in each step by transfers to depots supervised by the IDO of vehicles that are in excess of levels agreed upon for each step. At specified periods during the Stage I reduction process, the vehicles that have been placed under supervision of the IDO shall be destroyed or converted to peaceful uses.
(b) Production of agreed categories of strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles and agreed types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be discontinued or limited.
(c) Testing of agreed categories of strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles and agreed types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be limited or halted.

E. To Promote the Peaceful Use of Outer Space:
(a) The placing into orbit or stationing in outer space of weapons capable c,f producing mass destruction shall be prohibited.
(b) States shall give advance notification to participating states and to the IDO of launchings of space vehicles and missiles, together with the track of the vehicle.

F. To Reduce the Risks of War by Accident, Miscalculation, and Surprise Attack:
(a) States shall give advance notification to the participating states and to the IDO of major military movements and maneuvers, on a scale as may be agreed, which might give rise to misinterpretation or cause alarm and induce countermeasures. The notification shall include the geographic areas to be used and the nature, scale and time span of the event.
(b) There shall be established observation posts at such locations as major ports, railway centers, motor highways, and air bases to report on concentrations and movements of military forces.
(c) There shall also be established such additional inspection arrangements to reduce the danger of surprise attack as may be agreed.
(d) An international commission shall be established immediately within the IDO to examine and make recommendations on the possibility of further measures to reduce the risks of nuclear war by accident, miscalculation, or failure of communication.

G. To Keep the Peace:
(a) States shall reaffirm their obligations under the U.N. Charter to refrain from the threat or use of any type of armed force--including nuclear, conventional, or CBR--contrary to the principles of the U.N. Charter.
(b) States shall agree to refrain from indirect aggression and subversion against any country.
(c) States shall use all appropriate processes for the peaceful settlement of disputes and shall seek within the United Nations further arrangements for the peaceful settlement of international disputes and for the codification and progressive development of international law.
(d) States shall develop arrangements in Stage I for the establishment in Stage II of a U.N. Peace Force.
(e) A U.N. peace observation group shall be staffed with a standing cadre of observers who could be dispatched to investigate any situation which might constitute a threat to or breach of the peace.

STAGE II 

A. International Disarmament Organization:
The powers and responsibilities of the IDO shall be progressively enlarged in order to give it the capabilities to verify the measures undertaken in Stage II.

B. To Further Reduce Armed Forces and Armaments:
(a) Levels of forces for the U.S., U.S.S.R., and other militarily significant states shall be further reduced by substantial amounts to agreed levels in equitable and balanced steps.
(b) Levels of armaments of prescribed types shall be further reduced by equitable and balanced steps. The reduction shall be accomplished by transfers of armaments to depots supervised by the IDO. When, at specified periods during the Stage II reduction process, the parties have agreed that the armaments and armed forces are at prescribed levels, the armaments in depots shall be destroyed or converted to peaceful uses.
(c) There shall be further agreed restrictions on the production of armaments.
(d) Agreed military bases and facilities wherever they are located shall be dismantled or converted to peaceful uses.
(e) Depending upon the findings of the Experts Commission on CBR weapons, the production of CBR weapons shall be halted, existing stocks progressively reduced, and the resulting excess quantities destroyed or converted to peaceful uses.

C. To Further Reduce the Nuclear Threat:
Stocks of nuclear weapons shall be progressively reduced to the minimum levels which can be agreed upon as a result of the findings of the Nuclear Experts Commission; the resulting excess of fissionable material shall be transferred to peaceful purposes.

D. To Further Reduce Strategic Nuclear Weapons Delivery Vehicles:
Further reductions in the stocks of strategic nuclear weapons delivery vehicles and agreed types of weapons designed to counter such vehicles shall be carried out in accordance with the procedure outlined in Stage I.

E. To Keep the Peace:
During Stage II, states shall develop further the peace-keeping processes of the United Nations, to the end that the United Nations can effectively in Stage III deter or suppress any threat or use of force in violation of the purposes and principles of the United Nations:
(a) States shall agree upon strengthening the structure, authority, and operation of the United Nations so as to assure that the United Nations will be able effectively to protect states against threats to or breaches of the peace.
(b) The U.N. Peace Force shall be established and progressively strengthened.
(c) States shall also agree upon further improvements and developments in rules of international conduct and in processes for peaceful settlement of disputes and differences.

STAGE III 

By the time Stage II has been completed, the confidence produced through a verified disarmament program, the acceptance of rules of peaceful international behavior, and the development of strengthened international peace-keeping processes within the framework of the U.N. should have reached a point where the states of the world can move forward to Stage III. In Stage III progressive controlled disarmament and continuously developing principles and procedures of international law would proceed to a point where no state would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened U.N. Peace Force and all international disputes would be settled according to the agreed principles of international conduct.

The progressive steps to be taken during the final phase of the disarmament program would be directed toward the attainment of a world in which:
(a) States would retain only those forces, non-nuclear armaments, and establishments required for the purpose of maintaining internal order; they would also support and provide agreed manpower for a U.N. Peace Force.
(b) The U.N. Peace Force, equipped with agreed types and quantities of armaments, would be fully functioning.
(c) The manufacture of armaments would be prohibited except for those of agreed types and quantities to be used by the U.N. Peace Force and those required to maintain internal order. All other armaments would be destroyed or converted to peaceful purposes.
(d) The peace-keeping capabilities of the United Nations would be sufficiently strong and the obligations of all states under such arrangements sufficiently far-reaching as to assure peace and the just settlement of differences in a disarmed world.

The United States did in fact announce a world police force, and they did it more than 50 years ago. Today it is called NATO.

The above text is copied verbatim from U.S. Department of State Publication 7277, Freedom From War: The United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World, Disarmament Series 5, Office of Public Services, Bureau of Public Affairs, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., O 609147.

If you are unfamiliar with this document and don't believe its authenticity, here is a direct link sourced from the United States Senate's official government website.

This document was drafted by former U.S. National Security Advisor and Secretary of State, Heinz Alfred Kissinger, a German national and Soviet deep cover agent (code named "Bor") who had changed his birth name to "Henry" to evade suspicion of his conspiratorial espionage. State Department Publication 7277 was personally delivered to the United Nations by President John F. Kennedy in September of 1961.

It is the official policy of the United States of America, and reveals the plans of the federal government of the United States to retroactively transfer its military forces to the United Nations. It specifically outlines an ongoing agenda to combine the police and military forces of the United States of America with Russia in three distinct stages, into what will be the "peace-keeping" forces of the new world government under the authority of the United Nations bureaucracy.

"The meaning of peace," explained socialist revolutionary Karl Marx, "is the absence of opposition to socialism."

That statement—which I have cited often due to its extreme importance—holds a lot of weight, because anyone who has made an honest study of the United Nations knows that it was founded by socialists, and the Charter of the United Nations—an almost word-for-word duplicate of the Constitution of the Soviet Union—was penned by socialists. The truth is, the Charter of the United Nations is slated by its framers to be the "World Constitution."

Ultimately, according to the collectivist plan introduced by the U.S. State Department, the only military force will be a world police force under the United Nations in sufficient numbers with state-of-the-art technology to field overwhelming force against any perceived threat to the world supra-government. The military of the United States of America is currently filling the requirement. It is currently in stage two, and moving into the final stage of the plan.

Understanding the successes to date since the introduction of 7277, the senior Officer Corps of all of our military forces have betrayed their Oaths of allegiance to the Constitution for the United States of America, the Supreme Law of our guaranteed Republican form of government, and have joined the conspiracy to end our national sovereignty and unite with other U.N. member states under a totalitarian socialist world government.

"E Pluribus Unum." Out of Many, One.

You see, none of this is new. This subject is what originally compelled me to write and disseminate information, and I have written extensively and documented the structural build-up of a tyrannical military police state/martial law scenario in this country, and enumerated the punishments for treason as defined in the law [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11].

The particular agenda to create a world police force has been (at least) 54 years in the planning stages, and probably a long time before that. Considering this, the record-breaking nationwide Special Forces domestic operation Jade Helm 15 to "master the human domain" [1][2][3][4], the U.S. Army Special Operations Command's ARSOF Operating Concept 2022 to "operationlize the CONUS [Continental United States] base" [1][2], the DoD's National Guard State Partnership Program involving 74 nations around the globe evolving "from a 1991 U.S. European command decision," the Justice Department's March 12th announcement to federalize local law enforcement [1][2], are all just extensions of the stated long-term agenda of the United States.

And for whatever reason you think this may all be transpiring—wether it be preparations for a forthcoming economic collapse, resulting civil unrest and martial law; a Continuity of Government program of the Pentagon to shore-up defenses in preparation for World War III; a federal takeover of the States and disarming of lawful gun owners, purging of political opponents and military commanders; relocating military infrastructure to avoid a forthcoming earthquake, super-volcano, pole shift, the incoming 3,600-year orbit 10th planet discovered in 1979 by the Pioneer space probe, or other extreme weather event; another chapter in blurring the lines between the police and military, desensitizing and normalizing the aberrant shame of a standing army on the streets of America following the end of Posse Comitatus; an operational test of 4th generation warfare or a giant psychological operation of perception management; or all the above—whatever reason you may attach to this burgeoning police state, there is no question that it is happening right before our eyes in accordance with a long-established official framework of documentation, and obviously for a very specific reason.

Being a veteran of the Armed Forces of the United States, I know that we train where we fight and fight where we train. This is all taking place not for training purposes for the future prospect of foreign deployment, as its public relations arms claim, but for domestic operations in "unconventional warfare" on U.S. soil. After all, employing the assistance of "Interagency Partners" (the DHS, FBI, DEA and local law enforcement) who have no explainable precedent in foreign war as these agencies have no foreign operating charter, has no adequate demonstrable convention.

$4.2 billion worth of military surplus has been handed over to local police forces by the federal government in recent years. My local police department received a whopping $1.6 million in surplus weapons and military-grade hardware. Many combat veterans have even exclaimed how American cops are more heavily armed than they were as front-line soldiers in active war zones. Hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars are being spent annually to outgun the average American citizen, to position the federal U.S. military forces, agencies and their auxiliary local and state law enforcement partners throughout the continental United States to eliminate the opposition of the United Nations disarmament agenda as their peace-keeping force, and to prepare for a major event to coincide with multiple flash-points.

Having discussed this agenda with every active duty military member, veteran and police personnel I know, we all agree unanimously that the federal government of the United States is terrified of We the People getting fed-up, or something else (or both), and is actively planning in concert with local and state law enforcement agencies, for some big forthcoming trigger event. And whatever it is, its imminent.

I hope you are likewise shoring up your defenses, because one thing is for sure, something big is about to happen that will change our way of life in this country. If we allow our Creator-endowed Freedom to be stripped, then we will never get it back. Truthfully, if you aren't willing to die in the defense of it, then you probably never deserved it anyway.

And if you are making a concerted effort to get right with the Almighty, then you know as I do that you have nothing to fear, for if you die in the defense of God and of the principles and ideals which blessed this nation with greatness from its inception, then you will be the only one in the world who is truly free.

CONTRIBUTE TO MY RESEARCH!

I work very hard and spend innumerable hours studying, researching and digging out the truth, which is a great cost to a husband and father. I have nothing to sell; no advertising, no contracts, no corporate partners nor sponsors. Please help me by donating the amount that you feel this information deserves. Thank you for contributing to my time and effort, and ultimately to the restoration of Liberty and Freedom for all. May God bless each and every single one of you.

Thank you! - Tim

Treason: The Disarmament of the United States, and the Declaration of World Government

It has already been done on paper. Now it has to be sold to the American people and the world.

"The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting." – Sun Tzu

America the Battlefield
Oct. 30, 2013
By Tim Pope


I received the following article last night from World Net Daily: Obama 'Gutting Military' by Purging Generals (Intended to send message 'down through the ranks'), by WND writer F. Michael Maloof, and wanted to get my thoughts on the record regarding its revelations.

In the article, retired US Army Major General Paul Vallely, an outspoken critic of the Obama administration, claims it is part of Obama’s strategy to reduce the standing of the United States worldwide.

"Obama is intentionally weakening and gutting our military, Pentagon and reducing us as a superpower, and anyone in the ranks who disagrees or speaks out is being purged," he charged.

That assessment, I can assure you, is not merely guesswork or conjecture or interpretation. It is a fact.

And it is well-documented in the words of the perpetrators of the agenda.

I wrote about this subject back on July 12, 2012 in an article: The True Agenda of UN and State Department Gun Control.

However, I had only grasped a fraction of the bigger picture. I detailed the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty and the 1961 US State Department memorandum 7277, Freedom From War: The United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World.

I explained how the disarmament program is essentially a plan to engineer a "United Nations Peace Force" that would "enforce the peace as the disarmament process proceeds," and that a gradual build-down of police and military forces is outlined, which will leave only NATO as the world army.

2,500 people have read that article since it posted, which contributed to the over 83,000 unique page views on my blog.

What I did not know when I wrote that article, though, was that all of this isn't just a future plan. It is in play now, and we are currently at the tail end of phase two of the three-phase plan of the UN-generated scheme of disarming the world in a prelude to installing a one world totalitarian socialist government.

I did not know then that the United States Constitution has already been replaced (on paper) by the Charter of the United Nations under the United Nations Treaty and the UN Participation Act.

I did not know then that all of this was pushed through by Harry S. Truman, a 33rd degree Freemason and Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of Missouri of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry's southern jurisdiction.

I did not know then that our nation is no longer operating under the Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land, but in fact is currently operating under the Charter of the United Nations, an international consortium of unelected bureaucracies that have no loyalty to our national security, nor of protecting the rights or sovereignty of the American people.

In 1942, the State Department and members of the Council on Foreign Relations collaborated to set up a new "supranational organization" to replace the failed League of Nations, based on President Woodrow Wilson’s internationalist ideas.

The UN Charter was drafted by Alger Hiss, a known communist revolutionary, and 14 members of the CFR (see the US Arms Control and Disarmament Agency and the United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs).

The UN Charter was signed into law on June 26, 1945, in San Francisco with little protest from the voters who were traumatized by Japan’s recent attack on Pearl Harbor. US Senators accepted the charter without even viewing a copy, even though they were not authorized to bind US citizens, without our consent, to the conditions of the UN charter.

The Council on Foreign Relations is a serpentine network of international revolutionaries and fascist ideologues whose stated goal is to end American sovereignty and bring about, via the subversion of the democratic process, a global Marxist revolution.

The CFR's Study No. 7, published November 25, 1959, openly declared its true purpose:

"...building a New International Order [which] must be responsive to world aspirations for peace, [and] for social and economic change ... an international order [code for world government] ... including states labeling themselves as 'Socialist.'"

One could safely say that a nutshell descriptor of the CFR is "to bring about a New World Order through the manipulation of US foreign policy and relations, and through international economic interdependence."

And how is US foreign policy and relations manipulated? Money. Specifically, economic interdependence. And you thought that "Novus Ordo Seclorum" on the back of your $1 bill was merely a cryptic, meaningless Latin phrase? No, it is the plan. "Anuit Coeptis" (Enterprise Successful), "Novus Ordo Seclorum" (New World Order). The name of the game is control through monetary systems. For the love of money is the root of all evil, and the control of money is the control of all evil.

CFR member and Judge Advocate General of the US Navy Admiral Chester Ward wrote:

"The main purpose of the CFR is promoting the disarmament of US sovereignty and national dependence and submergence into an all powerful, one world government."

This high ranking military officer went on to explain their procedures for influencing policy, claiming:

"Once the ruling members of the CFR shadow government have decided that the US government should adopt a particular policy, the very substantial research facilities of the CFR are put to work to develop arguments, intellectual and emotional, to support the new policy and to confound and discredit, intellectually and politically, any opposition."

And that is precisely what is now happening among the ranks of our military command structure. The shake-up (identification, vilification and nullification) of all flag officers and other ranking commanders loyal to the Republic and the US Constitution who will not outwardly go along with the one world government—the main opposition force—are being confounded, discredited and removed.

One world government, you say?

On February 17, 1950, James Paul Warburg, founder of the United World Federalists, who helped fund Hitler's rise to power during the Nazi's Third Reich, confidently declared to the United States Senate:

"We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent."

In America, the original seeds of world government were planted by Truman in the US Public Law 87-297 Arms Control and Disarmament Act. Look it up.

PL87-297 calls for the United States to eliminate its armed forces. This law was signed for the United States in 1961 by John F. Kennedy and every US president since has worked to enact its provisions.

The government knows you will not approve, which is why they want to take away your firearms. Title 22 USC § 2551 is the congressional statement of purpose, and defines the government's meaning of "disarmament." It calls for the "elimination of our armed forces," and the "elimination of weapons of all kinds." That means your personal citizen-owned conventional firearms used for hunting and self defense.

Public Law 101-216 is the sister document to 87-297. In a clear-cut violation of his oath of office, it was signed into law by George Herbert Walker Bush on December 11, 1989. It calls for the divesting of our common defense, including the elimination of weapons of all kinds, and a draw-down of all branches of our armed forces.

From Title V, Sec 61 of PL101-216:

"(2) as defined in this Act, the terms 'arms control' and 'disarmament' mean 'the identification, verification, inspection, limitation, control, reduction, or elimination, of armed forces and armaments of all kinds under international agreement to establish an effective system of international control';"

Let me read that last part again to you, in case you missed it, "...TO ESTABLISH AN EFFECTIVE SYSTEM OF INTERNATIONAL CONTROL."

Do you understand? That's what all of this about, control, not peace.

Since PL87-297 was first passed into law, there have been 18 amendments made to it, and the US House of Representatives votes bi-annually to appropriate funds for this and other on-going programs like PL101-216.

In Stage 1 of the program, we are to reduce our armed forces to 2.1 million men, and transfer (on a permanent basis) one-half of them to be merged with the Russian and Chinese armies. In Stage 2, the remaining one-half of our armed forces is then turned over to the Security Council of the United Nations. The person in charge of the merged armies must, by agreement, always be a Russian.

The world's smaller nations turn 100% of their armies over to the same under-secretary of the Security Council in Stage 2. Former President George H.W. Bush and Admiral William J. Crowe referred to this process as being "in transition." The ultimate goal to be reached in Stage 3 of the disarmament process is to "proceed to a point where no state [nation] would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened UN Peace Force."

You see? It is already done on paper. The treason has been done. Now, all the involved traitors must sell the American people on disarmament before we get wind of what has been perpetrated; before we become outraged and bring them all to justice.

The Obama administration is systematically purging all who would stand in the way of the edicts of the United Nations Charter, and Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely was correct in his assumption that "Obama is intentionally weakening and gutting our military, Pentagon and reducing us as a superpower."

Duty personnel backed up Vallely's concern, suggesting that the firings are meant to send a message to "young officers down through the ranks" not to criticize the president or White House politics.

Little do they know, unless they have a lot of time to read and study historic documents, US codes and charters, that the message was sent long before they were even born. And if they want to keep their job, they are told to keep their mouth shut and follow orders.

What is the historic precedent set for dutiful commanders and NCO's who follow orders, no matter what? The night of the long knives. After all, the international power base can't trust anyone in the long run, can they?

Then, all that will be left, according to the UN Charter, Memorandum 7277, and US Public Laws 87-297 and 101-216, is the United Nations world army, where no nation would have the military power to challenge them.

What other international body besides the UN could possibly be behind establishing world government?

It is the same United Nations that declared in an official report in July of 2001:

"Civilian ownership of any firearm in the US threatens the legitimate power monopoly of the state."

In contrast, our Second Amendment protects "the right of the people to keep and bear arms" from any infringement, proclaiming a "well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State." NECESSARY TO THE SECURITY OF OUR FREE STATE. No state or people will ever be free under a totalitarian world government. If Americans abdicate our freedom to an international order, we will never get it back.

Governments and kingdoms never willingly relinquish power unless by force. With that said, power is never bestowed upon rulers unless the people allow it. Frederick Douglass said that "Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will." And the globalist and desired change agent Henry Kissinger is known to have often said, "Power is the ultimate aphrodisiac." Kissinger also stated in an address to the Bilderberg meeting at Evian, France on May 21, 1992:

"The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well being granted to them by their world government."

Senator Joseph McCarthy was onto something, but he didn't really know what to call it. Regardless, he was not allowed to get too close to the truth. What we know as the United States Government is not our real government. It was overthrown long ago by authoritarian socialists posing as liberals in favor of illegitimate corporate law. Our Constitutional Republic was displaced by the blueprint for world government, the United Nations Charter, and our imposter government has been operating under its international law directorates ceremonially, until the time that Stage 3 of the disarmament plan can be implemented.

All of the traitors in the House and Senate know this and have continued funding it. All of our presidents since Kennedy have known it and signed-off on it. Our State Department, military commands, executive, legislative and judicial branches all know it and are following it to the letter behind a thin veil of nationalism.

Now you know why the Constitution and Bill of Rights are no longer a legal defense for an American citizen in a United States court of law. Because we have (knowingly or unknowingly) contracted away our constitutional protections and are a ward of the United States Corporation in agreement with the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), which falls directly under the UN Charter.

The treason is in the ratification, implementation and amendments of these edicts, without the consent of the governed, to further the aims of the international community against the United States of America.

Article III, Section 3, Clause 2 of the US Constitution defines treason and its punishment thusly:

"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted."

The United States Code 18 U.S.C. § 2381 (the treason clause) states: "Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason..."

Treason is a capital crime punishable by attainder of the REAL elected Constitutional Congress, by imprisonment or death.

"...and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States."

I can think of no greater breach of national security—no more significant example of treason—than levying war against our United States in adherence to our enemies for the purpose of disarming our people and military defenses, to end our national sovereignty in the guise of peace.

Barack Obama is disarming our nation in accordance with the UN Charter. He is purging top brass who are refusing to go along with privately-owned weapons confiscation programs under a martial law scenario, and administering litmus tests to find out who among them will fire on American citizen resistors if ordered to do so. He is passing illegal legislation to disarm law-abiding citizens (the unorganized militia which is necessary to the security of a free State). He is weakening military readiness by making defense budget cuts while funding the UN, grounding squadrons of air superiority fighter wings, and withholding military pay. He issued the stand-down order for reinforcements in Benghazi. He is dismantling our nuclear defense capabilities and shut down the US Air Force Space Fence surveillance system after 50 years, an early warning system that tracks incoming debris and meteors that could pose an emergency threat.

Most disturbingly, however, Obama scaled-back technology on US missile defense systems and pulled the plug entirely on our southern air defense system. Utilized by the US Air Force, North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), and U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the Tethered Aerostat Radar System (TARS) program identifies enemy aircraft and missiles that may penetrate the border and cross into US airspace.

That's right, Aerostat flight operations was ordered to cease TARS operations and prepare sites for permanent closure. An Exelis employee close to the TARS project had this to say about the closure of the sites:

"Not only will this closure mean hundreds of people will be out of jobs, but it also means our borders will not be safe. These defense radars detect low-flying aircraft infiltrating our borders. 

Without these defense radars, low-flying aircraft will go undetected. It will be open season for any drug/gun/slave smugglers, terrorists flying in with nukes, low altitude missiles, or even a full scale low elevation invasion/attack against America."

Many writers and talking heads are spinning their wheels, debating how it’s difficult to imagine the motivation behind the move to further weaken US air defenses on the southern border. They are busy pointing out that the US government has chosen to shutdown this outward facing surveillance system, and has instead turned the surveillance inward, on the American people, spending hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars to do it. They are asking the question that if September 11, 2001 was any indication of our air defense capabilities, and considering that any ground invasion of the United States would originate on our southern border, then wouldn’t we want as many early warning systems as possible to be actively protecting our country in these specific areas?

Yes, We the People would. And all the while, Russia, China and Iran are all propelling their defense technology, investing billions into improving military readiness, proliferating weapons and shoring-up alliances with each other AGAINST the United States.

You see, the mainstream and alternative media are all sheltering-in-place among the accepted surface-level spectrum of debate, but are missing the point. It's the big elephant in the room that no one dares acknowledge, that we are a captured operation.

We are already captured by a foreign unelected body of power-hungry authoritarians who understand that the sovereignty of the United States of America is the only thing that stands in the way of their world government agenda. And we are already under international law, our constitutional protections dismantled and abrogated to the trash pile of history by a beast system that covets a secular world order in which no nation would have the power to stand against it.

And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him? (Revelation 13:4)

All beast systems spoken of in the Bible were in reference to a government or kingdom. Why a beast? Because a beast, a wild animal, cannot be reasoned with.

So yes, Obama is intentionally weakening and gutting our military, and reducing us as a superpower. It is his assignment, and he is merely following the orders of his world federalist superiors, who represent the new world order. Every member of his regime are guilty of conspiracy to commit treason, as were most of the presidential regimes since Kennedy.

None of this is by accident. It is a very carefully crafted and orchestrated plan, as Franklin D. Roosevelt admitted, "In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way."

Here are a few profound examples of the stated long-term plan for disarmament and the installation of world government under international socialism:

"We at the executive level here were active in either the OSS, the State Department, or the European Economic Administration. During those times, and without exception, we operated under directions issued by the White House. We are continuing to be guided by just such directives [National Security Decision Directives], the substance of which were to the effect that we should make every effort to alter a life in the United States as to make possible a comfortable merger with the Soviet Union." – H. Rowan Gaither (1953), President of the Ford Foundation

"Our main agenda is to have ALL guns banned. We must use whatever means possible. It doesn't matter if you have to distort facts or even lie. Our task of creating a socialist America can only succeed when those who would resist us have been totally disarmed." – Sarah Brady, Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence

"The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism, but under the name of liberalism they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program until one day America will be a socialist nation without ever knowing how it happened . . . I no longer need to run as a presidential candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democrat Party has adopted our platform." – Norman Thomas, 6-time presidential candidate of the American Socialist Party

"In the long run, global politics are bound to become increasingly uncongenial to the concentration of hegemonic power in the hands of a single state. Hence, America is not only the first, as well as the only, truly global superpower, but it is also likely to be the very last." - Zbigniew Brzezinski, 'The Grand Chessboard,' pg. 209

"Every Communist must grasp the truth, 'Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.'" – Mao Tse-tung

"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure—one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." – David Rockefeller, from his book, 'Memoirs,' pg. 405

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty if an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries." – David Rockefeller, in an address to a Trilateral Commission meeting in June of 1991

Are you beginning to see the bigger picture?

So, what are you going to do with this information? Either we stand for something, or we fall for anything. If you will stand for nothing, then the perpetrators were right in their assessment of the future American citizenry:

"This was the primary issue of concern to the nation's elite in 1954. While so-called moral issues were raised, it was agreed that a nation or world or people who will not use their intelligence are no better than animals who do not have intelligence. Such a people are mere beasts of burden and steaks on the table by choice and consent." – Operations Research Technical Manual TM-SW7905.1 'SILENT WEAPONS FOR QUIET WARS' (An introductory programming manual) May 1979; FM 74-1120

Does that describe you? I hope not, for the sake of your future and for your children's future.

To research this information further, please listen to the 13-part audio series by William Cooper from January 1994, entitled 'Treason: World Government Declared'. It is the most comprehensive culmination of research on this subject anywhere in the world:

Treason: World Government Declared
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5
Part 6
Part 7
Part 8
Part 9
Part 10
Part 11
Part 12
Part 13

Final thought: In time throughout the world, history has never been changed by a committee. It was always only ever changed by one person.

It always started with you. And it always will.

CONTRIBUTE TO MY RESEARCH!

I work very hard and spend innumerable hours studying, researching and digging out the truth, which is a great cost to a husband and father. I have nothing to sell; no advertising, no contracts, no corporate partners nor sponsors. Please help me by donating the amount that you feel this information deserves. Thank you for contributing to my time and effort, and ultimately to the restoration of Liberty and Freedom for all. May God bless each and every single one of you.

Thank you! - Tim