Tuesday, July 17, 2012

The True Agenda of U.N. and State Department Gun Control


There is a lot of confusion and misinformation regarding the United Nations' global gun control agenda. Let's disregard what the media would have us believe, and focus primarily on what the U.N. and the U.S. State Department have declared in their own words.

Many say that the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty will regulate only the international trade of  arms and will not impact the law-abiding citizens of America. That is just not so. It has been identified as a flagrant threat to the Second Amendment, and Barack Obama has expressed his determination to sign it on July 27, despite massive opposition by the American people and the Congress.

130 members of the House are convinced that the treaty poses a threat to the Second Amendment. On June 29, they sent a letter to Obama and Secretary of State Clinton expressing concerns about the treaty, stating that the treaty infringes on the “fundamental, individual right to keep and bear arms” and says the United States government does not have the right to support a treaty that violates the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

"Civilian ownership of any firearm in the U.S. threatens the legitimate power monopoly of the state."

Furthermore, the Arms Trade Treaty has its roots planted firmly in a 1961 State Department memorandum which explains how the United Nations will oversee “complete disarmament” of the American people under the ruse of preventing war.


Memorandum 7277 spells out a plan to create a “United Nations Peace Force” that would “enforce the peace as the disarmament process proceeds.”

The document makes it clear that the only groups allowed to own weapons of any kind would be governing authorities, “for the purpose of maintaining internal order,” and the U.N. “peacekeeping” force itself, which would require “agreed manpower.”

“The manufacture of armaments would be prohibited except for those of agreed types and quantities to be used by the U.N. Peace Force and those required to maintain internal order. All other armaments would be destroyed or converted to peaceful purposes,” states the document.

Memorandum 7277 declares that in the future, law enforcement are not going to be allowed to be armed either. All that will be left is a federalized brigade of troops and a local SWAT team under them. In all the current national emergency agreements, the SWAT teams and emergency teams are already federalized, and are standing by at the local DHS Threat Fusion Centers.

This is corroborated in the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) document, 'Implications of States' Views on an Arms Trade Treaty'. Graphics in this UNIDIR document show that when they are finished disarming the police, a gradual build-down will commence, leaving only NATO as the world army: http://www.einiras.net/pub/details.cfm?lng=en&id=55665

------------------------------

Relevant links:

“Our ultimate goal—total control of handguns in the United States—is going to take time..."
------------------------------

Relevant Video Clips:


------------------------------

Relevant Articles:

“Our main agenda is to have ALL guns banned. We must use whatever means possible."
------------------------------

Death by Gun Control:


------------------------------

Relevant Quotes:

“Registration makes it easy for a tyrannical government to confiscate firearms and to make prey of its subjects." - Stephen P. Halbrook, Ph.D., Constitutional Lawyer

“The only purpose of gun registration is gun confiscation, whether it is done individually and piecemeal, as the legal requirements to own a gun become more and more difficult, or en mass, when the government feels the necessity to disarm its citizens in order to further its control." - Dean Weingarten

“If the American people learn that the motivations for all of this was to make a case to deprive them of their Second Amendment rights or to make a case to further the (Justice) department’s ability to further regulate gun rights within the United States, that would make them very angry." - Rep. Trent Franks (R-AZ)

“We have an administration that has said ‘don’t let a good crisis go to waste’ and you wonder if this was actually a manufactured crisis." - Rep. Blake Farenthold (R-TX)

"The agreement is trying to act as though this is really just a treaty about international arms trade between nation states, but there is no doubt that the real agenda here is domestic firearms control.” - John Bolton, Former US Ambassador to the UN

"We need to really brainwash people into thinking about guns in a vastly different way." - Eric Holder, U.S. Attorney General

“Our ultimate goal—total control of handguns in the United States—is going to take time... The first problem is to slow down the increasing number of handguns being produced... The second problem is to get handguns registered. And the final problem is to make the possession of handguns and all handgun ammunition- except for the military, policemen, licensed security guards, licensed sporting clubs, and licensed gun collectors - totally illegal.” - Sarah Brady, Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence

“Our main agenda is to have ALL guns banned. We must use whatever means possible. It doesn't matter if you have to distort facts or even lie. Our task of creating a socialist America can only succeed when those who would resist us have been totally disarmed.” - Sarah Brady, Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence

"Civilian ownership of any firearm in the U.S. threatens the legitimate power monopoly of the state." - From an official U.N. report in July, 2001

"Governments that push for gun registration distrust their people, and have earned the people's distrust." - Dean Weingarten

I work very hard and spend countless hours researching and digging out the truth.
I have nothing to sell; no advertising, no contracts, no corporate partners nor contributors.
Please help me by donating the amount you feel this information deserves.
Thank you for contributing to the restoration of Liberty and Freedom,
and may God bless each and every single one of you.

4 comments:

  1. Yup, they came and took up all the guns late last year, no point in further bellyaching about it now. Wild bears are eating children on the streets of Duluth as I write this, and the government is covering it up.

    ReplyDelete
  2. @Anonymous
    After they've already ratified the amendment and taken the guns it will be too late to do anything about it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Too late for who? The law-abiding citizens who follow the edicts of their masters unquestioningly? I think you are still thinking in terms of the acceptable spectrum of debate which determines what is "legal." The U.S. Supreme Court once declared that black people weren't human, therefore un-legalizing their inherent God-given right to live and be free. However, that didn't make it right or lawful. Adolph Hitler declared that Jewish-born citizens of Germany were retroactively criminalized and were to be imprisoned and subject to democide (death by government). You have to get away from what fallen men who call themselves "lawmakers" deem legal or illegal by decree via legislation. Does it infringe upon your inherent God-given rights given to you at birth by your Creator? If yes, then it is unlawful in the sight of God and according to nature, and you as a human being have the right to fight for it in whichever way you deem necessary. "Too late to do anything about it" are the words of slaves, and not of free men.

      Delete
  3. With everyone stuck in there iphone or tv or simply they don't care cause the're against guns anyway. It will be real hard to stop them. Kinda makes me wanna move to a log cabin in the woods...and be ready to defend my own(family).

    ReplyDelete

Please feel free to comment