Friday, March 29, 2013
Food For Thought: No Conservative NRA Members Involved in Mass Shootings
Thursday, March 28, 2013
Retired US Army Captain: 'Hear me America, the DHS is preparing to go to war with you'
On Saturday, Terry M. Hestilow, a retired United States Army Captain from Fort Worth, Texas, posted a letter on his Facebook account that he wrote to Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, warning that the Department of Homeland Security is preparing to go to war with the citizens of the United States.
Further, I am somewhat overwhelmed at the response to my posts leading up to this letter on this issue. At this point almost 3,000 of you have shared my original post, I have 994 new friends requests, 61 messages, and 70 new comments to process.
Please be patient with me and pray that this window of communication remains open to all of us as we respond to this threat against our Constitution and our people. I am awed by you, by your positive response, and your wonderful support. We each have a role to play in standing against this present tyranny.
Part of that proper response is sending them a letter like this from YOU, and following it up to make sure it remains a "hot button" issue that must be resolved. God bless you as you honor your oaths and your obligations as citizens of this free nation. May we once again know honorable leadership and peace at home. With all sincerity and respect—Resolved, Captain Terry M. Hestilow, United States Army, Retired.
The Honorable Senator John Cornyn, State of Texas
United States Senate
517 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Re: Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and that agencies preparation for war against citizens of the United States of America.
Dear Senator Cornyn,
It is with gravest concern that I write to you today concerning the recent appropriation of weapons by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) that can only be understood as a bold threat of war by that agency, and the Obama administration, against the citizens of the United States of America. To date, DHS has been unwilling to provide to you, the elected representatives of the People, justification for recent purchases of almost 3,000 mine-resistant ambush-protected (MRAP) armored personnel carriers, 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition (with associated weapons), and other weapons systems, when, in fact, the DHS has no war mission or war making authority within the limits of the United States of America.
Significant is the fact that at the same time the Obama administration is arming his DHS for war within the limits of the United States against the People of the United States in accordance with his 2008 campaign speech claiming,
“We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set. We’ve gotta (sic) have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded [as the United States military]” — Candidate Barack Obama, 2008.
The Obama administration is deliberately de-funding, overextending, and hollowing the Department of Defense; the only legitimate agency of the U.S. government with a war mission.
This act of the Obama administration stands as a glaring threat of war against our nation’s citizens! This act of the Obama administration can only be understood as a tyrannical threat against the Constitution of the United States of America! If left unresolved, the peace loving citizens who have sworn to defend the United States Constitution “against all enemies, both foreign and domestic” are left no option except to prepare to defend themselves, and the U.S. Constitution, against this Administration’s “coup” against the People and the foundations of liberty fought for and defended for the past 238 years. We have no choice if we honor our oaths.
The only proper response to this threat against the American people is for the representatives of the People, the members of the U.S. House and Senate, to demand in clear terms that the Administration cannot ignore, that the Department of Homeland Security immediately surrender their newly appropriated weapons of war to the Department of Defense (DoD). Further, since the DHS has assumed a position in the Administration to enforce the tyrannical acts of this president against the People of the United States against the limits of the United States Constitution, it remains for the United States Congress to exercise its limiting power in the balancing of powers established by our founding fathers, to disestablish and dissolve the DHS as soon as possible. One needs only to look to the rise of Adolf Hitler, and his associated DHS organizations, the SA and the SS, of 1932-1934, to see the outcome of allowing an agency of government this kind of control over the free citizens of a nation. The people of Germany could not have imagined, until it was too late, the danger of allowing a tyrant this kind of power. We must not be so naïve as to think it will not happen to us as well if we remain passive toward this power grab by the Marxist Obama administration!
Finally, for more than two centuries the nation has lived in peace at home because of the protections of our legitimate military and the many appropriate state and federal law enforcement agencies, supported by Constitutional courts. We stand today at a cross-road. Will we allow this present Administration to overthrow our United States Constitution and its legal processes to amend injustices, or, will we honor our obligations to defend the Constitution against a “domestic” enemy? Our Constitution lays out the proper methods of resolving our differences; and it does not include its overthrow by a rogue agency of a Marxist leadership at home. You, sir, are our constitutionally elected agent to defend our Constitution at home. We are counting upon you. We remain aware, however, of this present threat and will not expose ourselves as an easy prey to the authors of the destruction of our nation.
I know that this letter demands much of you. We elected you because we, the citizens of the State of Texas, believe that you are up to the task at hand and will, against all threats, honor your oath and office. We are also writing to your fellow members of the House and Senate to stand in integrity with the Constitution and against this present threat by the Obama administration and his DHS.
We refuse to surrender our Constitution or our nation!
Resolved,
Captain Terry M. Hestilow
United States Army, Retired
Fort Worth, Texas
March 23, 2013
Although the DHS has attempted to explain its mammoth purchase of ammunition by claiming the bullets are being acquired in bulk to save money and that they are for training purposes only, this has been disputed by reputable voices such as former Marine Richard Mason, who told reporters with WHPTV News in Pennsylvania earlier this month, “We never trained with hollow points, we didn’t even see hollow points my entire four and a half years in the Marine Corps.”
Hollow point bullets are almost twice as expensive as full metal jackets, therefore the DHS’ explanation that it is buying huge quantities in bulk to “save money” doesn’t make sense.
Concerns about the apparent arms build-up are growing, with retired United States Army Captain Terry M. Hestilow sending a letter to Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) warning that the ammo purchases represent “a bold threat of war by that agency (DHS), and the Obama administration, against the citizens of the United States of America.”
Questions from members of Congress about why the federal agency is buying up ammo, exacerbating shortages across the country, have been met with silence:
- Kansas Congressman Timothy Huelscamp said last week that threats should be made to withdraw funding from the DHS if it didn’t explain why it was purchasing so many bullets, remarking, “They have no answer for that question. They refuse to answer to answer that.”
- Earlier this month, New Jersey Congressman Leonard Lance said, “Congress has a responsibility to ask Secretary Napolitano as to exactly why these purchases have occurred,” signaling his intention to get answers.
- Californian Congressman Doug LaMalfa and 14 of his House colleagues have written a letter to the Department of Homeland Security asking if the purchases are, “being conducted in a manner that strategically denies the American people access to ammunition.”
Although members of Congress are treating the matter with the seriousness it deserves, the mainstream and leftist media have attempted to ridicule the entire issue as a conspiracy theory, with Atlantic Wire even suggesting that the story had its origins in a debunked email, a report that completely failed to even mention the admitted fact that the DHS had purchased around 2 billion bullets.
While the DHS continues to purchase bullets in large quantities, police departments have been forced to barter amongst each other in a desperate scramble to meet their ammo needs.
As DHS is sucking up ammunition and war-making equipment so the military and civilians can no longer get it, General Amos is warning his Marines to be very frugal with ammo and fuel. There is very good reason to suspect the DHS of preparing for war against the American people.
General Amos, Commandant of the Marine Corps, warned his Marines recently in a video to "Save every round, every gallon of gas."
As the following video depicting an extensive aggregation of news reports shows, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is preparing for "massive civil war" in America. "The federal government is preparing for civil uprising, so every time you hear about troop movements, every time you hear about movements of military equipment, the militarization of the police, the buying of the ammunition, all of this is . . . they (DHS) are preparing for a massive uprising."
Who Does The Government Intend To Shoot?
In the August 2012 op-ed piece 'Who Does The Government Intend To Shoot?' by Major General Jerry Curry, USA (Ret.), a decorated combat veteran, Army Aviator, Paratrooper, and Ranger, observed, "The Social Security Administration (SSA) confirms that it is purchasing 174 thousand rounds of hollow point bullets to be delivered to 41 locations in major cities across the U.S. No one has yet said what the purpose of these purchases is, though we are led to believe that they will be used only in an emergency to counteract and control civil unrest. Those against whom the hollow point bullets are to be used — those causing the civil unrest — must be American citizens; since the SSA has never been used overseas to help foreign countries maintain control of their citizens."
Later in his article, Major General Curry writes, "Obama is a deadly serious, persistent man. Once he focuses on an object, he pursues it to the end. What is his focus here? All of these rounds of ammunition can only be used to kill American citizens, though there is enough ammunition being ordered to kill, in addition to every American citizen, also every Iranian, Syrian or Mexican. There is simply too much of it. And this much ammunition can’t be just for training, there aren’t that many weapons and “shooters” in the U.S. to fire it."
Relevant news articles:
RT — DHS under fire for buying another 360,000 bullets ‘to save money’
Forbes — 1.6 Billion Rounds Of Ammo For Homeland Security? It's Time For A National Conversation
Breitbart — Feds Buy Two Billion Rounds of Ammunition
Examiner — DHS adds 21.6 million rounds of ammo to its nearly 2 billion round stockpile
Wednesday, March 13, 2013
Converging Flashpoints - A Crash Course In Where We Stand
The signs are all present: Drones flying over U.S. cities and towns, enemy kill lists sanctioned by the executive office, allocation of ammunition to the DHS, the Social Security Administration and other federal government agencies, and even the designation of our returning veterans as potential domestic terrorists.
Converging Flashpoints - A Crash Course In Where We Stand
Steve Quaye on the Hagmann & Hagmann Report
Tue, March 12, 2013 09:00 pm
Listen to internet radio with Hagmann and Hagmann Report on Blog Talk Radio
Saturday, March 9, 2013
How To Resist Tyranny in America
"Papers, please." In America? Yes. But, you DO NOT have to comply.
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) have been erecting and manning dozens of illegal Nazi Gestapo-like checkpoints throughout the United States in recent months. Why do I say they are illegal? Because that is what the supreme law of the land, the U.S. Constitution, and innumerable Supreme Court rulings and officially-recognized legal declarations say they are.
Before we get any further, watch this video:
Some well-meaning people may say that these drivers are being problematic or rebellious, or that they would just comply with the officials, unless they "had something to hide." Some may say that it's to keep out the illegals.
If that were true, then why did the DHS last week release more than 2,000 illegal immigrants who may have been convicted of serious crimes, due to budget cuts? If the checkpoints are in fact to keep out the illegal immigrants, then why do government documents show the Obama administration planned to release roughly 5,000 of them by the end of March? If it were true, then why did the field offices of the agency empowered with the enforcement of America's domestic security report that more than 2,000 immigrants were released in February before intense criticism led to a temporary shutdown of the plan?
Why do people of good intent still repeat the false mantra that it is "for our safety"? Because that is what we are expected to think by the very institutions spreading this fallacy. It has been said that the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
The exact same checkpoints that are going up in America went up throughout Germany in February and March of 1933, during the waning years of the free Weimar Republic before the seizure of power by the Nazi state.
The same checkpoints were enforced by Joseph Stalin, the de facto leader of the oppressive communist Soviet Union from the mid-1920s until his death in 1953.
The same checkpoints were garrisoned by East Germany's Ministry for State Security, commonly known as the Stasi, one of the most effective and repressive intelligence and secret police agencies in the world, from 1950-1989. “Checkpoint Charlie” was the name given by the Western Allies to the well-known Berlin Wall crossing point between East Berlin and West Berlin during the Cold War.
The same checkpoints are manned by the Ejército Mexicano (Mexican Army) throughout Mexico. It is often said, "If you want to see what a police state looks like, travel through Mexico."
The same checkpoints currently overlook the allied positions blocking all access routes into and out of the Demilitarized Zone in the North Korean dictatorship.
The same checkpoints are presently manned by military men armed with automatic weapons winding through the late Hugo Chávez's despotic Venezuela.
Those who don't know history really are doomed to repeat it.
The Fourth Amendment (Amendment IV) to the United States Constitution is the part of the Bill of Rights which guards against unreasonable searches and seizures, along with requiring any warrant to be judicially sanctioned and supported by probable cause. It was adopted as a response to the abuse of the writ of assistance, which is a type of general search warrant, in the American Revolution. Search and seizure (including arrest), according to the Fourth Amendment, should be limited in scope according to specific information supplied to the issuing court, usually by a law enforcement officer, who has sworn by it. The Fourth Amendment applies to the states by way of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Similarly, The Fifth Amendment (Amendment V) to the United States Constitution, protects against abuse of government authority in a legal procedure.
Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution: No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
And as an added bonus, the dotting of the "i" and the crossing of the "t" of Liberty, our founders saw fit to enumerate the ultimate authority of state governments and We the People, to check or resist the tyrannical proclivities of the federal government. The Tenth Amendment embodies the wisdom of checks and balances and makes explicit the idea that the federal government is limited only to the powers granted to it in the Constitution.
Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
John Marshall, Chief Justice of the United States (1801-1835) whose court opinions helped lay the basis for American constitutional law, said in the landmark United States Supreme Court case, Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803), “All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution, are null and void." Marbury v. Madison formed the basis for the exercise of judicial review in the United States under Article III of the Constitution.
In his speech to the Virginia Ratifying Convention on June 5, 1778, Patrick Henry admonished his colleagues to, “Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined."
Lets clear up another common misconception. It is not the Constitution that gives us our rights. No, as the framers of the Constitution unanimously declared, it enumerates what our natural rights are as granted by our creator God. The Bill of Rights and Constitution underscore our rights, highlight them, point them out and effectively add a great big exclamation point after them.
The Constitution is the permanent reminder to the federal government of the citizens' unalienable rights of which they cannot rightly infringe upon. As John Adams so poignantly enunciated, “You have rights antecedent to all earthly governments; rights that cannot be repealed or restrained by human laws; rights derived from the Great Lesigislator of the Universe.”
Regarding these unconstitutional checkpoints, you DO NOT have to comply with their question's or demands. You DO NOT have to submit to their tyranny.
I have written my elected representatives in my home state of Florida to let them know that the I will not comply with the unconstitutional and illegitimate revenue-generating highway checkpoints announced last month by the Florida Highway Patrol. I also let them know that the checkpoints are illegal and repugnant to the Constitution, and are there null and void. Read about it at my blog here.
Before you go spouting off the current accepted talking point that "it's for our safety," remember what Benjamin Franklin warned all who fall for this deceptive subversion, “Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.”
Here are a few other affecting quotations on the matter of preserving liberty, by astute minds:
“Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber barons cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.” ― C. S. Lewis
“Power-lust is a weed that grows only in the vacant lots of an abandoned mind.” ― Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
“Good intentions will always be pleaded for any assumption of power. The Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters.” ― Daniel Webster
“When the government’s boot is on your throat, whether it is a left boot or a right boot is of no consequence.” ― Gary Lloyd
Lest you absent-mindedly fall for the illusion of the collaborator media that "we're doing just fine," the United States is now recognized globally as one of the most oppressive police states on earth. These illegitimate checkpoints going up around the country are but one of the latest examples of the sickening depths to which our once-free Republic has fallen. The military industrial complex, which President Dwight D. Eisenhower warned us about in his January 17, 1961 farewell address, is transforming our once free nation into a giant prison camp, a police state control grid constructed in the engineered crisis of fighting the never-ending "war on terror".
How did it come to this? How did our once-free America turn into a Gestapo of would-be slaves acquiescing to despotism? Why do free men submit to having the private parts of their wives and children groped by uniformed strangers while standing in a line waiting to travel about the country? Why do we allow enforcers of the law, who were once called "peace officers", to unreasonably search and seize our persons, houses, papers and effects without a warrant, and without any reasonable suspicion that we may have committed a crime? Why do we cower and grovel to a government that no longer serves the best interests of the people they represent, and that no longer derives its just powers from the consent of the governed? Why do we pay such a sum of our earnings to a bloated institution that taxes us without representation, and that spends our money with reckless abandon on a system that enslaves us with each passing day? Why do we willingly serve a shadow system that has, as the Declaration of Independence decried, "...erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance"?
The answer:
The people don't know their rights!
Nor are the people as a majority willing to stand and fight for their rights.
Nor do the majority of them believe that the Constitution is being incrementally eviscerated, and that their rights are assuredly under siege.
When one does not know and understand what the blessings of liberty promise, then how can one hold onto them when they are being stripped away? How can we defend the line when we haven't even drawn our line in the sand that shall not be crossed?
The late Bill Cooper, investigative journalists, researcher, radio broadcaster and author, said of our rights when asked in an interview where they are, "They're wherever we're willing to draw a line and say 'you cannot come across this line or I'll kill you.' That's where our rights are. If you don't understand that, folks, then it's beyond my capability to explain it to you. They will get away with whatever you let them get away with. And until you draw the line and you're willing to die for what you believe in, they will keep taking and taking and taking and taking, until there is no more left to take. Then, it's all gone, and you're a slave." Bill Cooper was killed on November 5th, 2001 in a S.W.A.T. raid on his ranch in Arizona.
The great orator Samuel Adams said, “If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.”
If We the People are not even willing to assert our authority granted by our divine creator and resist tyranny, then how will we ever make it as a free people? How will our children and children's children ever know and understand the blessing of liberty?
We must not comply. We must resist at all costs, because to comply will make us willing conspirators of our own demise.
For all my fellow Bible-believing Christians who defer to Romans 13 in the concerted effort of blind submission to authority, I have also read it. According to the Romans 13 that I've read, a Christian's duty to civil government affirms that submission is altogether limited and that the obey-government-no-matter-what and the divine-right-of-kings arguments are false. These arguments have been used by virtually every tyrant since the ministry of Jesus, including Adolf Hitler, who cited Romans 13 as his favorite Bible passage and used it as an example for the German evangelicals to stand down. This false doctrine is doing more to bring America and the rest of the world into slavery than perhaps any other thing. Holders of this doctrine are creating self-fulfilling prophecies of America's destruction. For more on the true nature of a Christian's duty in submitting to a just authority, read ROMANS 13: The True Meaning of Submission by Timothy Baldwin, J.D. and Dr. Chuck Baldwin.
The noted American social reformer and leader of the abolitionist movement, Frederick Douglass, said of acquiescing to tyranny, “Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will. Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have found out the exact measure of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them, and these will continue till they are resisted with either words or blows, or both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress.”
What are we quietly willing to submit to? What is the exact measure of injustice and wrong which we will allow to be imposed upon us? What is the level of our endurance against those who oppress us?
I like what Thomas Jefferson had to say:
"I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man... Resistance to tyranny is obedience to God."
Will you submit, or will you resist?
I refer you to the document which was enshrined for all future generations of Americans, the Declaration of Independence, which was written as a result of a tyrannical form of government that increasingly became destructive of Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness, the unalienable Rights endowed by their Creator, and the necessity of the people to dissolve the political bands which connected them to it:
IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776: But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
Where are you willing to draw a line and say, "you cannot come across this line or I'll kill you"? That line is where your rights are. If you don't understand that, then it is beyond my capability to explain it to you.
If you don't understand that, then you and your children are already slaves.
Thursday, March 7, 2013
Arrest Warrants Issued for Pope Benedict, Queen Elizabeth, Canadian PM Stephen Harper and Dozens of Other Church-State Officials
Thirty officials of church and state who were convicted last week of committing and concealing Crimes against Humanity in Canada have defied a lawful Court Order, and now face immediate arrest.
This is not being covered by western news media.
Yesterday, March 6, 2013, the International Common Law Court of Justice issued an International Citizens Arrest Warrant, of one year duration, authorizing the detaining and imprisonment of thirty fugitives from justice under the terms of the Court Verdict of February 25, 2013.
A copy of the stamped and sealed Citizens Arrest Warrant is attached below.
The public seizure of the property and assets of the guilty parties and their organizations will also commence today, in Canada, the United States, England and Italy, in accordance with the Court Order.
The fugitive criminals include Catholic, Anglican and United Church officers in Canada, corporate and RCMP officials, and the Canadian Prime Minister, Stephen Harper. But they also include former Pope Benedict XVI (Joseph Ratzinger), three top Cardinals in Vatican City, the head of the Jesuit Order, the Queen of England and the Archbishop of Canterbury.
The verdict read in part:
"We the Citizen Jury find that the Defendants in this case are guilty of the two indictments, that is, they are guilty of committing or aiding and abetting Crimes against Humanity, and of being part of an ongoing Criminal Conspiracy."
"These convicted felons can hide all they want, but their church property can't," said Calvin Hodges, a Common Law Court Peace Officer in Canada who will lead church occupations there.
"We've declared them Public Enemies for killing thousands of Indian children, protecting child rapists, and covering up their filth. If we can't arrest them right away, then we'll ban them and these churches from our communities."
The Court's judgement declares the ill-gotten wealth and property of the institutions responsible for the Canadian genocide to be forfeited, placed under public ownership and re-distributed to the People, as reparations for the families of the more than 50,000 Native Canadian children who died in the residential schools.
The Court and its sponsoring body, the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (ITCCS), are issuing Public Notices in fifteen countries declaring the Thirty to be wanted criminals who pose a Clear and Present Danger to children and citizens, and asking for the help of other governments and citizens to detain them.
The Citizen Arrest Warrant is being issued to local Citizen Action groups, authorizing them to arrest the Thirty and seize their property.
Local regular police authorities in Canada, England, the United States and Italy have been formally asked by the Court to cooperate in enforcing its Order.
Ongoing church occupations will continue indefinitely and will involve an International Week of Reclamation leading up to Easter Sunday, between March 24 and 31, 2013.
Issued by ITCCS Central – Brussels
Click here to read details of the final guilty verdict and the official 7-part document rendered in the first Common Law Court case against the Vatican and Canada for genocide.
Listen to the 2-hour BlogTalkRadio broadcast from Saturday, March 6, 2013, of the exclusive story on We the Jury with Kevin Annett, Common Law Court jurors and Irish anti-Vatican activists with ITCCS Ireland.
Featured guests include Lisa Shannon (USA) and Melanie Spencer (Netherlands), Citizen Jurors with the Common Law Court of Justice, who with other jurors recently found the Pope and others Guilty of Crimes against Humanity - and who have issued a Court Order for their arrest.
Also appearing are John Deegan, Gerry O'Donovan and Dave O'Brien of ITCCS Ireland, who have led church occupations in Dublin on behalf of victims of Catholic church violence.
Wednesday, March 6, 2013
Publius Huldah Shows Federal Gun Control Is Unlawful
Lawyer, philosopher and logician, Publius Huldah, gives a profound lesson regarding why any attempts by the federal government to infringe upon the natural right of self defense of the American citizen is unlawful, unconstitutional and illegitimate. She outlines how any edicts mandated by the federal government to disarm the civilian population are null and void, and should be ignored at all costs.
Also noted is the fact that the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, contrary to popular opinion, does not give us the right to keep and bear arms. It merely recognizes our natural, God-given right, which is antecedent to all earthly governments, and cannot be constrained by the federal government or any other official body or person.
Everyone should watch this speech prior to any intellectual discussion on gun rights, especially with your county sheriff or an elected representative:
Publius Huldah is a strict constructionist of the U.S. Constitution, passionate about The Federalist Papers (Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay), restoring limited constitutional government, Bible scholarship, and the important writings of Ayn Rand.
She also writes legal and constitutional commentary at her website: http://publiushuldah.wordpress.com
I work very hard and spend countless hours researching and digging out the truth.
I have nothing to sell; no advertising, no contracts, no corporate partners nor contributors.
Please help me by donating the amount you feel this information deserves.
Thank you for contributing to the restoration of Liberty and Freedom,
and may God bless each and every single one of you.
Also noted is the fact that the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, contrary to popular opinion, does not give us the right to keep and bear arms. It merely recognizes our natural, God-given right, which is antecedent to all earthly governments, and cannot be constrained by the federal government or any other official body or person.
Second Amendment to the United States Constitution: A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
Everyone should watch this speech prior to any intellectual discussion on gun rights, especially with your county sheriff or an elected representative:
Publius Huldah is a strict constructionist of the U.S. Constitution, passionate about The Federalist Papers (Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay), restoring limited constitutional government, Bible scholarship, and the important writings of Ayn Rand.
She also writes legal and constitutional commentary at her website: http://publiushuldah.wordpress.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)