Democracy is Indispensable to Socialism: A Treatise on the Subversion of our Republic

Remove the word "Democracy" from your American vocabulary!

"The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government..." ― The Constitution for the United States of America, Article IV, Section 4 [1]

What exactly is a democracy? We hear it everywhere from just about everyone of any importance who has a voice. Democracy is a quintessential part of the American vernacular; the embodiment of our nation's history and heritage; the bedrock principle upon which this country was founded.

Right?

In this essay I will answer that question to the best of my abilities, and clarify exactly what a democracy is in comparison to a republic, and how our lawful form of government is being subverted from within, so that there is no room for misunderstanding or misinterpretation.

America the Battlefield
by Timothy A. Pope
May 8, 2015

Let's start with the word democracy. Where did it come from? What is its origin? Let's analyze the root words.

The prefix "demo" is derived from the Greek root word dêmos (δῆμος), meaning "people." For example, the word demographic relates to the written study of the structure of populations of people groups in particular regions of the world.

The suffix of democracy, "ocracy" [also "cracy" in nouns] comes from the Greek root word krátos (κράτος), and denotes a government by a particular sort of people or according to a particular principle; meaning "force" or "power."

So, the Greek dēmokratía (δημοκρατια) combines the elements dêmos, which means "people," and krátos, which means "power." Simply put, dēmokratía (or dêmos-krátos) means "power of the people" or its variant, "rule of the majority."

Thus, a democracy is a government by the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the popular vote of the people and exercised directly by them and not by elected representatives. In stark contrast, a republic (Latin rēs pūblica, meaning "public affair" or "commonwealth") is a government in which power resides in elected individuals representing the citizen body and government leaders who exercise power according to the Rule of Law.

Likewise, the suffix "crat" means rule or ruler, so the word "democrat" means one who observes the absolute rule of the people.

Words have meaning under the law, and they have very specific intent. Also, our framers did not intend for those words—which were carefully chosen according to the definition of those words—to be interpreted. And to really understand the definitions of those words, you need to reference the Webster's 1828 (or earlier) dictionary. And to understand the intent of the founding fathers, you must read the Federalist Papers and the Anti-Federalist Papers and their writings and their letters and their books and their speeches. Then you will know what they meant.

Intent is EVERYTHING IN THE LAW, and if you think that none of that matters to you, then you are not an American and are of no use or consequence in the animating contest of Freedom and to the restoration of the Constitution for the United States of America to its rightful place as the Supreme Law of the land.

To understand the law you must understand the intent of those who passed the law. That's why we have a Congressional Record. That's why we have the Federal Register. That's why the writings of the major lawmakers of this nation, and the major figures and the founding of this nation have been so carefully preserved over the years. It could even be said that that these full body of writings could be the very foundation of the law.

However, most Americans sadly do not understand the foundation of the law in this country, and that the first document of the law didn't even have anything to do with this country at all. It was called the Magna Carta of 1297, the "Great Charter of the Liberties," which was drafted by the Archbishop of Canterbury and agreed upon by King John, promising the protection of rights.

The second document in law is the Mayflower Compact, the first governing document of Plymouth Colony. And then comes some of the pacts and constitutions and agreements and contracts struck by the first colonists in their colonies and towns and societies which they formed after immigrating from Europe.

And then the Declaration of Independence and the Articles of Confederation, which are still a part of our law, the Constitution for the United States of America and the Bill of Rights, and the lawful Amendments thereto, the "Charters of Freedom" which most Americans have never read, don't even understand and have no desire to comprehend let alone to master.

Personally, I fail to see why they could not be understood, because they are so very simple and clearly written. They are the very definition of simplicity and there can be no genuine misconstruction of their ends as they leave absolutely nothing to interpretation, especially the Constitution and its integrated Bill of Rights.

So, why is a democracy a bad idea? Doesn't a government by the power of the people sound good? Theoretically, on paper, yes. But practically, it has always failed in every case whatsoever it has been attempted throughout history.

Italian Prime Minister Benito Mussolini, one of the founding theoreticians of Fascism, said, "Democracy is beautiful in theory; in practice it is a fallacy." Mussolini ruled democratically until 1925 when he felt powerful enough, dropped all pretense of democracy and set-up a legalized dictatorship in his country.

A democracy might have been a good system of governance IF the people as a majority were moral and virtuous, and who, in the words of George Washington, regarded the "eternal rules of Order and Right which Heaven itself hath ordained."

That is the same reason why John Adams said that our Constitution was "made only for a moral and religious people . . . wholly inadequate to the government of any other."

In like manner, Benjamin Franklin wrote in a letter to Abbés Chalut and Arnaud in 1787 that "only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters."

Is that now true for this nation of ours? Do we have more need of masters? Someone, somewhere sure thinks so.

Let's now study a very important document from our nation's history, which is now elusive and nearly impossible to acquire a copy of.

Issued by the United States War Department on November 30, 1928, the Soldiers Training Manual offered instruction on the topic of Citizenship. Its intent was to prepare soldiers that they "may be returned to civilian life better equipped as the defenders of the institutions of our Government in time of peace as well as in time of war."

A primary purpose of the manual was to impart valuable knowledge of our republican form of government, and an understanding of the many ways it is superior to a democracy. After all, every member of the U.S. Armed Forces swears an Oath affirming that they will "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic."

The following definitions were published by the authority of the United States Government to differentiate between our republic and a democracy.

Prepared under the direction of the Chief of Staff. 

Official definition of DEMOCRACY

Copied from the 1928 U.S. Army Training Manual No. 2000-25, published by the then War Department, Washington, D.C., November 30, 1928.

CITIZENSHIP

This manual supersedes Manual of Citizenship Training. The use of the publication "The Constitution of the United States," by Harry Atwood, is by permission and courtesy of the author.

CITIZENSHIP Democracy:

A government of the masses. Authority derived through mass meeting or any other form of "direct" expression. Results in mobocracy. Attitude toward property is communistic — negating property rights. Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate, whether it be based upon deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice, and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences. Results in demagogism, license, agitation, discontent, anarchy.

Vladimir Lenin, communist revolutionary, Premier of the Soviet Union, and the man who gave form to the modern socialist doctrine, said:

"Democracy is indispensable to socialism."

Karl Marx, socialist revolutionary, founder of the social sciences and sociology, and author of 'The Communist Manifesto' (1848), said:

"The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism."

And both Vladimir Lenin and Albert Pike said:

"The ultimate goal of socialism is communism."

Albert Pike was the Grand Commander of North American Freemasonry and author of an 1871 letter to Giuseppe Mazzini (fellow Mason, Italian revolutionary and head of the transnational Sicilian Mafia) which envisioned three World Wars for the purpose of bringing about a one-world socialist government. In his book, Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, Pike wrote that Lucifer is the god of Freemasonry.

Why is that important? Because Pike cited the linear democracy-socialism-communism agenda as the vehicle for world conquest and the destruction of all the governments, monarchies and religions of the word save his own: Masonic Luciferianism. And everywhere communism takes hold of a region, extreme religious persecution and purging of political dissidents becomes paramount.

In contrast to describing a democracy, the 1928 U.S. Army Training Manual 2000-25 defined a republic as the form of government which the United States of America is guaranteed under the law from its inception; the law which has never been amended, repealed, nor rescinded.

CITIZENSHIP Republic:

Authority is derived through the election by the people of public officials best fitted to represent them. Attitude toward property is respect for laws and individual rights, and a sensible economic procedure. Attitude toward law is the administration of justice in accord with fixed principles and established evidence, with a strict regard to consequences. A greater number of citizens and extent of territory may be brought within its compass. Avoids the dangerous extreme of either tyranny or mobocracy. Results in statesmanship, liberty, reason, justice, contentment, and progress. Is the 'standard form' of government throughout the world. A republic is a form of government under a Constitution, which provides for the election of: 

(1) an executive and (2) a legislative body, who working together in a representative capacity, have all the power of appointment, all power of legislation, all power to raise revenue and appropriate expenditures, and are required to create (3) a judiciary to pass upon the justice and legality of their governmental acts and to recognize (4) certain inherent individual rights. Take away any one or more of those four elements and you are drifting into autocracy. Add one or more to those four elements and you are drifting into democracy. — Atwood. 

Superior to all others. — Autocracy declares the divine right of kings; its authority can not be questioned; its powers are arbitrarily or unjustly administered. Democracy is the "direct" rule of the people and has been repeatedly tried without success. Our Constitutional fathers, familiar with the strength and weakness of both autocracy and democracy, with fixed principles definitely in mind, defined a representative republican form of government. They made a very marked distinction between a republic and a democracy and said repeatedly and emphatically that they had founded a republic. 

By order of the Secretary of War: C.P. Summerall, Major General, Chief of Staff. Official: Lutz Wahl, Major General, The Adjutant General.

(Source: Fruit from a Poisonous Tree, Melvin Stamper, JD, iUniverse, October 30, 2008, ISBN-10: 0595524966, pp. 262-263 [1])

This training manual was withdrawn after less than five years in print. Shortly after the "bank holiday" in 1933, hush-hush orders from the White House suddenly demanded that all copies of Training Manual 2000-25 be withdrawn from the Government Printing Office and the Army posts, to be suppressed and destroyed without explanation.

This action was the beginning of the complete Communist control of our government from within.

While this indeed occurred, several copies of the manual survived in private ownership and still change hands today from time to time. Roosevelt also purged any negative references regarding "democracy" from other federal training materials, via Executive Order.

You see, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt was a life-long socialist who started America down the path of democracy, which is the political vehicle on the road to socialism. He was also a highly-degreed Freemason of the Scottish Rite of the Southern Jurisdiction, awarded the coveted meritorious 33rd degree before entering the presidency.

Incidentally, Harry S. Truman, a fellow 33rd degree Freemason and Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of Missouri of the Scottish Rite of the Southern Jurisdiction [1], became the 33rd President of the United States of America upon the death of Franklin D. Roosevelt.

Also, Roosevelt met with two other fellow Masons, Winston Churchill and Joseph Stalin, at the Yalta Conference in Potsdam, Germany in 1945 to formulate the forthcoming "Perestroika Deception" of the Cold War and the perceived fall of the the Soviet Union as a means to disarm the West. That agenda was fleshed-out by these brethren in the guise of discussing Europe's post-war reorganization.

Why is that important? It is known throughout esoteric circles that only two U.S. Presidents have not been either members of Freemasonry or degreed adepts of various secretive fraternal societies, brotherhoods and orders. Those two presidents were Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy.

Thirty-nine days after the investiture of President Franklin D. Roosevelt's fifth cousin, Theodore Roosevelt, to the meritorious 33rd degree of Freemasonry, he erected a statue of Albert Pike at Judiciary Square in Washington D.C., where it stands to this day. In 1944, one year before Franklin D. Roosevelt's death, the remains of Albert Pike were removed from Oak Hill Cemetery in the Georgetown section of Washington, D.C., and placed in the House of the Temple at 1733 16th Street NW, achieving a mystical apotheosis. The House of the Temple is a Masonic shrine and mausoleum in Washington, D.C., which serves as the headquarters of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry of the Southern Jurisdiction, and it sits just 13 blocks from the Oval Office.

Why is that important? Because Christopher Albert Pike, an adept of the Indo-Aryan mysteries and still regarded as the preeminent and influential Masonic philosopher, was a socialist.

Franklin Delano Roosevelt was born into the Anglo-Saxon Delano dynasty in 1882, the family of aristocratic drug-traffickers [1][2][3][4] who amassed vast fortunes during the Opium Wars of the 17th Century. The grandfather of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Captain Warren Delano, Jr., born in 1809 in Fairhaven, Massachusetts, descended from a long line of seafaring Delanos, was an apprentice at a Boston merchant bank and shipping firm, and developed trading routes in South America, the Pacific Islands and China.

Warren Delano, Jr., became the head of the Boston tea company, Russell & Company, and earned the position of Chief of Operations for Macao, Canton, and Hong Kong, in China. His greatest achievement in business was the expansion of Russell & Company’s world-wide distribution and trade in opium. This allowed Warren to count his family one among the four hundred wealthiest families in the world.

Franklin Delano Roosevelt was also strongly connected to the Venetian Black Nobility of Europe and the Jewish/Masonic Astor bloodline [1][2][3][4].

Why is this back history important in reference to transforming our once-free Constitutional Republic into a socialist state?

On March the 9th of 1933, the U.S. Congress voted as part of the "banking emergency" to approve all past, present and future Executive Orders written by any president, irregardless of party affiliation. Therefore, when they passed that law, the Congress effectively granted President Franklin Delano Roosevelt dictatorial powers, establishing an imperial Caesarean Executive emperor in the office of the presidency.

For a more thorough analysis of the Banking Emergency Act, the unlawful emergency powers statutes, the subversion of checks and balances in the United States and FDR's involvement, read my previous blogs: The War Powers of Government: America is Under Emergency Rule (06/03/14), and Administering of Martial Law: The Subversion of the Balance of Power (08/15/14).

In his Second State of the Union Address on January 4, 1935, Franklin D. Roosevelt said:

"We have undertaken a new order of things; yet we progress to it under the framework and in the spirit and intent of the American Constitution. We have proceeded throughout the Nation a measurable distance on the road toward this new order."

What was this "new order" undertaken by Roosevelt? It was the same new order as Adolph Hitler's German Nazi "Neuordnung"; the same as George Herbet Walker Bush's "New World Order"; Heinz Alfred (Henry) Kissinger's "New World Order"; the "New World Order" of the Council on foreign Relations; the "New Order of Nations" of the United States Army War College; Barack Hussein Obama's "World Order" and "New Order"; and the motto on the reverse of the Great Seal of the United States, added by Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1933, "Novus Ordo Seclorum" (New Secular Order or New Order of the World), and many, many others.

This new order is the materialistic and worldly social engineering of this country apart from its founding Godly morality, apart from the Rule of Law, and held under the auspices of Roosevelt's "New Deal."

The Social Security Act, a sweeping welfare program of federal entitlements signed into law by FDR on August 14, 1935, two years into his presidency, catapulted America down the road to ruin. It should come as no surprise that the terms "democracy," "progress," "change," and "new order" are all code words for socialism, and for transforming our once-free old Republic into a new Social Democracy. For if you're paying attention, the envisioned new order is to be a world totalitarian socialist government with the unification of church and state power, and a mob shackled in slavery.

The new order really is nothing new at all. It's really very old—taking us back to the ancient feudal despotism of antiquity.

Social Security isn't even "social," nor is it even remotely approaching "security." It's a trap. In the Pennsylvania Assembly's Reply to the Governor, dated November 11, 1755, Benjamin Franklin wrote a great truth:

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

When FDR instituted the Social Security Act, most Americans abdicated personal responsibility and stopped saving their money for old age, because they thought the government was going to take care of them. Why? Because the government was taking so much out of their paycheck every week for their "social security," and kept reciting a narrative of "protection" and "safeguarding assets" and for the "general welfare" to assuage their fears. The official story sheltered under the guise of "good intentions."

It didn't happen that way, however, and most of those Americans—your grandparents and mine included—who trusted in the President and his socialist program, were absolutely devastated when they finally figured it all out in their old age, because there isn't any money there and what little if any is there isn't even enough to live on.

Whereas, if they had saved and invested that money responsibly themselves, they would have retired as millionaires. It's a giant scam, a ponzi scheme that would make the Great Train Robbery blush. If your grandparents or parents are depending on Social Security, sit down and ask them—or any elderly person—how big their check is and what it pays for and what it buys. And then consider the current living costs and prices for rentals and for food and for clothing and for medical expenses and for cars and gas and everything else. Those who rely on Social Security were, and are, very poor in old age.

Not only that, when Social Security was first introduced, most Americans were terrified that the Social Security numbers would one day be used to identify them personally, and be used against them. And many Christians decried the number as the possible prophetic fulfillment of the scriptural Revelation of John, chapter 13, in which was written:

"And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name."

In response to the refusal of most Americans to participate, and their outright rejection of the proposed Social Security program, the government promised that Social Security numbers would never be used for personal identification, but only for Social Security administrative purposes. That, too, turned out to be a lie. Today, you pretty much can't do anything without your 9-digit Social Security number. You are personally identified with that number from cradle to grave.

It's not Social Security, and it never was.

Also, there is the issue with the mystical Social Security "trust fund." All of the trust funds maintained by the United States of America are codified in the United States Code. They are all listed—every single one of them. Anyone can read the U.S. Code online or in a law library and look up the trust funds administered and maintained by the United States of America under the law. THERE IS NO SOCIAL SECURITY TRUST FUND! There never has been, and there never will be.

Although, there exists very clever legalese and deceptive official websites and online forums attempting to relieve people of their critical analysis.

If you actually read the U.S. Code and the law therein which implements the Social Security Administration, you will see that it is just another unlawful payroll tax levied upon the labor of the American people. We also got tricked into paying income tax in a voluntary withholding agreement with the federal government. All of the hundreds of billions of dollars (estimated total $2.6 trillion) collected from Social Security goes into the general fund of the federal government, not into some imaginary old-age retirement trust.

That is why when the Congress takes money supposedly allocated under the Social Security fund, and uses it for something else, they are not technically doing anything wrong under the law. When the President takes Social Security money and uses it for something else, he is not breaking the law. He can pretty much do anything he wants with it, as it comes from the general fund.

Anyone who tells you otherwise is either repeating something they heard from someone else, or is bold-faced lying to you. Don't believe them or me. Look it up for yourself. Or don't, and just go on believing the big lie. Too many people take too many things for granted in this country, and that is precisely the reason we are in the huge mess that we find ourselves in.

If you haven't learned it yet, all socialists are liars and conspiracists. They cannot ever tell the truth about what they are doing, nor can they operate openly and on the level, because if they did then the people would reject their plan outright. That is why the entire platform of the socialist new world order is built upon a foundation of deception, because the truth is too terrible to stand on its own merits.

Former United States Secretary of State Madeline Albright, in an admission of conspiracy, summoned the Spirit of the Marshall Plan during her address at the 346th Commencement at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts on June 5, 1997, to support a new international vision of democracy. In her address she said, "Today, I say that no nation in the world need be left out of the system we are constructing."

This plan was published in the Los Angeles Times article, "Albright Logs America's Role as Pathfinder, Touts New World Order That All Nations Can Join," June 6, 1997, by Norman Kimster (reprinted in the St. Paul Planet Press), in which is written of her address: "In essence, Albright described a New World Order of nations made in the image of the United States."

A full transcript of Albright's address can be found at the website of the Harvard University Gazette. None of this plan of the international socialists is a secret. It is all out in the open in the public domain, for anyone who is willing to look.

General Douglas MacArthur described the plan this way in his memoir:

"For from one end of the world to the other there is a titanic struggle to seize control of industry and of the economics. Whether this be in the masquerade of Communism or Socialism or Fascism the purpose is the same—to destroy a primary element of Freedom and preempt it for the State . . . the forcing of a centrally controlled economic life upon all persons in the nation under an authoritarian monopoly that is politically managed."

The greatest threat to Freedom is the ever-increasing expansion of power in the hands of men who wield governmental authority for selfish aims without the constraints of the law. The threat also lies in the force of rulership by a people not constrained within the moral boundaries of Order and Right; a mobocracy of majority rules.

The corrupt men who wield governmental authority and who subvert the law for profit and gain are NOT the government. The government of this nation IS the Constitution for the United States of America, the Bill of Rights and the lawful Amendments thereto. And this Contract between the People and the individual sovereign States of the Union guarantees not a democracy but a republican form of government.

Teach your children and grandchildren these most important of truths, because if you do not, then they may very well find themselves enslaved, shackled to a forced, "centrally controlled economic life" under an "authoritarian monopoly" without any hope of restoring the universal blessings of Liberty and Freedom for themselves or their posterity.

Noah Webster's 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language, widely regarded as a work of great American importance and the essential book of definitions of law, defined the English language in the context of the era of the founding documents of this nation, and of the original intent of its framers.

Webster's 1828 Dictionary defined Democracy and Republic thusly:

DEMOCRACY, noun [Gr. People, and to possess, to govern.] Government by the people; a form of government, in which the supreme power is lodged in the hands of the people collectively, or in which the people exercise the powers of legislation. Such was the government of Athens. 

REPUB'LIC, noun [Latin respublica; res and publica; public affairs.] A commonwealth; a state in which the exercise of the sovereign power is lodged in representatives elected by the people. In modern usage, it differs from a democracy or democratic state, in which the people exercise the powers of sovereignty in person.

Noah Webster said:

"A pure democracy is generally a very bad government, It is often the most tyrannical government on earth; for a multitude is often rash, and will not hear reason."

Noah Webster's distant relative, Daniel Webster, a renowned Senator and Statesman, once enunciated on the floor of the Senate what real security means:

"Our security is our watchfulness of executive power. It was the Constitution of this department, which as infinitely the most difficult part in the great work of creating our present government; to give the executive department such power as should make it useful, and yet not such as should render it dangerous; to make it efficient, independent and strong, and yet to prevent it from sweeping away everything by its union of military and civil authority, by the influence of patronage, and office, and force."

Why Democracies Fail:

A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover they can vote themselves largess [the public funds] from the Treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the political candidate who promises the most freebies and benefits from the public treasury. The absolute and irrefutable result is that Democracy always collapses over a loose fiscal policy, the mob sentiment and this is always followed by a Dictatorship.

Did I say, "republic?" By God, yes, I said "republic!" Long live the glorious republic of the United States of America. Damn democracy. It is a fraudulent term used, often by ignorant persons but no less often by intellectual fakers, to describe an infamous mixture of socialism, miscegenation, graft, confiscation of property and denial of personal rights to individuals whose virtuous principles make them offensive.

(Source: Professor Alexander Fraser Tytler, Lord Woodhouselee (1747-1813), Westbrook Pegler, New York Journal American, January 25 and 26, 1951, under the titles: "Upholds Republic of U.S. Against Phony Democracy," and "Democracy in the U.S. Branded Meaningless.")

Thomas Babington Macaulay, 1st Baron Macaulay, (1800-1859), a British historian and Whig politician, wrote:

"American democracy must be a failure because it places the supreme authority in the hands of the poorest and most ignorant part of the society."

Social democracies have always been the political arm of dictatorships; the vehicle by which authoritarian and autocratic policies are legislated into place in order to pave the way for a government to assume absolute control over the individual.

In the speeches and writings of its most revered philosophers and authors, democracy is the code word for socialism.

For a taste of what socialism looks like in its purest form, recall from history the National Socialist German Workers' Party. The Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (NSDAP), commonly referred to in English as the "Nazi Party," transformed the representative federal German Weimar Republic into a totalitarian social democracy from 1920 to 1945.

No, Nazi Germany was not a communist nation like many textbooks say. The Third Reich of the Thule and Vril Societies blamed the communists for their ills as a cover for their own Hegelian ideology of political conflict resolution. Nazi Germany was socialist in the extreme reach and affect of the doctrine.

That's why the Austrian/German ruler was called the Kaiser, the German word for "Emperor," an office directly derived from the title of the Caesar of the Roman Empire.

That's why Adolf Hitler granted himself the title of Führer, the German word for "Leader" or "Guide." At the height of Hitler's power, he had effectively dissolved the representative federal Weimar Republic by purging all political opposition, and assumed supreme authority over the now democratized German people, therefore establishing a socialistic dictatorship.

As Nazi Germany was a state of National Socialism, so too was Soviet Russia—the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR)—an oxymoron in itself due to the fact that no socialist State could ever be a republic as defined in Western law. And it was a cadre of Soviet Russian spies, namely convicted Soviet agent Alger Hiss, who along with 14 members of the Council on foreign Relations penned the Charter of the United Nations, an organization of International Socialism (Nazisim).

The United States Army knew all of this back in 1928. Why don't American citizens know it today?

Why are we being taught in our public schools, colleges, courtrooms, by the government, the Pentagon, and from every officially-endorsed state news agency—from the President of the United States of America on down to the local school teacher—that the United States of America is no longer a Constitutional Republic, but a Democracy? And what is the visible utility of eliminating the specific republican citizenship training from our Armed Forces?

Answer that, and you'll know exactly what the agenda is and who stands to benefit from the outcome. It's no wonder we have a famine of the truth in the land and three generations of Americans who know nothing about our guaranteed form of government as clearly defined under the law of this nation. They believed what they were told without verifying it in their own research.

Franklin D. Roosevelt said that "the real safeguard of democracy, therefore, is education," and he was 100% correct. The education system in this country has been infiltrated and subverted by psychopoliticians and social engineers, and therefore we as parents are going to have to teach our children the truth. They for sure will not hear it in school or on the "all-seeing eye" in your living room.

Every single person and/or organization who is promulgating the socialization of America—especially our Marxist/socialist National Education Association—is one of two things. They are either (1) ignorant, or they are (2) in on the agenda to socialize us, and are therefore in a state of conspiratorial insurgency against the lawful supremacy of the Constitution, which is an act of treason (Sources: Article III, Section 3, Clauses 1 and 2 [1]; 18 U.S. Code § 2381 [1]).

Deception or Intention. Either way, the people are destroyed for lack of knowledge.

Recall when Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev, the leader of the U.S.S.R., banged his fists and shoe on the podium in the United Nations assembly on October 12th of 1960, railed against the West and screamed, "We will bury you . . . We do not have to invade the United States. We will destroy you from within."

He was absolutely correct. And indeed, Khrushchev's party colleagues forcefully removed him from power shortly after this outburst, because he had said too much and had given away the socialist plan to infiltrate, subvert and destroy the United States of America from within our own governmental system.

Turns out they would never need to invade the mainland United States with a standing army. Instead, they succeeded in changing the thinking of the majority of Americans to align with socialist ideology. How's that for majority rule?

Tell me, is this plan currently in the final stages of being realized, exactly as Khrushchev predicted it would? If you don't see it by now, then you never will.

My readers know how much I love poignant historic quotations, so I will leave you with these final thoughts, which tell it like it is:

"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." — Benjamin Franklin

"Democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine." — Thomas Jefferson

"Democracy is the road to socialism." — Karl Marx

"Democracy is the art and science of running the circus from the monkey cage." — H. L. Mencken

"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter." — Winston Churchill

"Dictatorship naturally arises out of democracy, and the most aggravated form of tyranny and slavery out of the most extreme liberty." — Plato

"Democracy . . . while it lasts, is more bloody than either aristocracy or monarchy. Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There is never a democracy that did not commit suicide." — John Adams

"Remember, the United States is not a democracy—and has never been intended to be a democracy." — Noam Chomsky

So then, America, change your vocabulary. Be a REAL American! Embrace your Constitutional Republican form of government, which is guaranteed and protected under the exhaustive legal framework of this nation, the only governmental system which ever recognized the Creator-endowed Freedom of all people. Restore it to its rightful place of lawful supremacy. Reject the deception and teach others the self-evident truth, especially your children, that they may likewise ignite brushfires of Freedom in the minds of men, and regard the eternal rules of Order and Right, forever invoking the propitious smiles of Heaven and the merciful blessings of our eternal God Almighty.

And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free (John 8:32).

CONTRIBUTE TO MY RESEARCH!

I work very hard and spend innumerable hours studying, researching and digging out the truth, which is a great cost to a husband and father. I have nothing to sell; no advertising, no contracts, no corporate partners nor sponsors. Please help me by donating the amount that you feel this information deserves. Thank you for contributing to my time and effort, and ultimately to the restoration of Liberty and Freedom for all. May God bless each and every single one of you.

Thank you! - Tim

General Douglas MacArthur's Prophetic Warning to the American People Foreshadowing the Socialistic Infiltration of our Constitutional Republic and Free Enterprise System

"This is the Voice of Freedom, General MacArthur speaking..."

The resonant voice cracked over the Signal Corps microphone, the people listening to him intently as he stood on the beach of Leyte, Philippines on that Day of Days in October 1944. "Rally to me! Rise and strike! . . . For your homes and hearths, strike! For future generations of your sons and daughters, strike! In the name of your sacred dead, strike! Let no heart be faint. Let every arm be steeled. The guidance of Divine God points the way."

America the Battlefield
by Timothy A. Pope
February 16, 2015

Love him or hate him, the indomitable General of the Army, Douglas MacArthur (1880-1964), an indelible military genius, was a great American—perhaps one of the greatest. He was a patriot, a warrior, a statesman, a rebel, a leader, a brilliant commander and a poet who never minced words nor failed to accomplish the mission at hand. He excelled at everything he put his hand to, and set the bar high and lofty for all men and women who are desirous to be actively engaged in the animating contest of Freedom. MacArthur lived in tumultuous times and presided over great struggles and battles fought for reasons up to and including the preservation of Liberty in every clime and place.

"You couldn't shrug your shoulders at Douglas MacArthur," observed historian David McCullough. "There was nothing bland about him, nothing passive about him, nothing dull about him. There's no question about his patriotism, there's no question about his courage, and there's no question, it seems to me, about his importance as one of the protagonists of the 20th century."

Once again our nation and world finds ourselves at the brink of regional and global war and conflict which defined MacArthur's time—the pre-staging of a third global conflagration with its preceding economic sanctions, currency wars and monetary realignments. With that in mind, the words in his farewell memoir could have been written today, because if you study the cycles of human nature, sociology, economics, weather, solar activity, civil unrest and war, history not only repeats itself, it rhymes.

"There is no present or future—only the past," wrote Eugene O'Neill, in A Moon for the Misbegotten, (1952), "happening over and over again..." And so it is in our day likewise recurring, the age-old cycles of plenty-to-poverty, peace-to-war, of which King Solomon hinted at in Ecclesiastes 1:9, "The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun."

Written in his own hand and finished only weeks before his death, General Douglas MacArthur's memoir, Reminiscences (1964), spans more than half a century of modern history. The following excerpt is, in my opinion, the most important words he ever penned and at the same time the greatest warning he ever recorded on behalf of the benefit of the American people and our posterity regarding what he came to acknowledge as the treacherous domestic threat infiltrating our American way of life—a warning which has all but fallen on deaf ears.

I'll let his own words speak for themselves, and then enumerate my thoughts below.

Sourced from my own personal copy of Reminiscences by Douglas MacArthur, (McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, NY, 1964), First Edition, Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 64-22955, pp. 414-418:

       Great changes have taken place in our military establishment, some good, some not so good. Materially the improvement has been spectacular, psychologically yet to be proven. The men in the ranks are largely citizen soldiers, sailors or airmen—men from the farm, the city, from school, from the college campus—men not dedicated to the profession of arms; men not primarily skilled in the art of war; men most amazingly like the men you know and see and meet each day of your life.
       If hostilities come these men will know the endless tramp of marching feet, the incessant whine of sniper bullets, the ceaseless rustle of sputtering machine guns, the sinister wail of air combat, the deafening blast of crashing bombs, the stealthy stroke of hidden torpedoes, the amphibious lurch over perilous waves, the dark majesty of fighting ships, the mad din of battle and all the tense and ghastly horror and savage destruction of a stricken area of war.
       These men will suffer hunger and thirst, broiling suns and frozen reaches, but they must go on and on and on when everything within them seems to stop and die. They will grow old in youth burned out in searing minutes, even though life owes them many tranquil years. In these troubled times of confused and bewildered international sophistication, let no man misunderstand why they must do that which they must do. These men will fight, and, perchance die, for one reason only—for their country—for America. No complex philosophies of world intrigue and conspiracy dominate their thoughts. No exploitation or extravagance of propaganda dims their sensibilities. Just the simple fact, their country called.
       But now strange voices are heard across the land, decrying this old and proven concept of patriotism. Seductive murmurs are arising that it is now outmoded by some more comprehensive and all-embracing philosophy, that we are provincial and immature or reactionary and stupid when we idealize our own country; that there is a higher destiny for us under another and more general flag [the United Nations]; that no longer when we send our sons and daughters to the battlefields must we see them through all the way to victory; that we can call upon them to fight and even to die in some halfhearted and indecisive war; that we can plunge them recklessly into war and then suddenly decide that it is a wrong war or in a wrong place or in a wrong time, or even that we can call it not a war at all by using some more euphemistic and gentler name [humanitarianism]; that we can treat them as expendable, although they are our own flesh and blood; that we, the strongest military nation in the world, have suddenly become dependent on others for our security and even our welfare.
       Listen not to these voices, be they from the one political party or from the other. Be they from the high and the mighty or the lowly and forgotten. Heed them not. Visit upon them a righteous scorn, born of the past sacrifices of your fighting sons and daughters. Repudiate them in the market place, on platforms, from the pulpit. The highest encomium [praise] you can still receive is to be called a patriot, if it means you love your country above all else and will place your life, if need be, at the service of your Flag.

        Great changes, even more comprehensive than in the military field, have taken place in industry. In its massive and almost limitless potential, the rugged determination of its leaders, the skill and energy of its workers, here has been welded an industrial supremacy such as the world has never before known. It comprises not only a power in being but a reserve power capable of being quickly mounted to meet and overcome any eventuality that might arise. This not only ensures a continuity of human progress but imposes an almost impassable barrier against any who would threaten the security of the American continent. It has thus become a leavening influence in a world where war and the threat and fear of war would otherwise so distort the minds of men as to threaten the progress of the human race.
        It represents a condition of preparedness born of American enterprise and vision, nurtured upon American energy and incentive, and depending for its ultimate strength upon American will and determination. It is the result and fruition of the capitalistic system—a system embracing every segment of American society—the owners of industry, the workers in industry, the public served by industry. This free enterprise based upon the right to work and the right to possess the fruits of that work has created an economic freedom which is the basis of all other freedoms.
        But this very success has created its own perils and harassments, both from without and from within. For from one end of the world to the other there is a titanic struggle to seize control of industry and of the economics. Whether this be in the masquerade of Communism or Socialism or Fascism the purpose is the same—to destroy a primary element of Freedom and preempt it for the State.
        The capitalistic system has hence become the great target, although it has never failed to provide the resource for an ever increasing standard for human life, has never failed to maximize the fruits of human energy and creative enterprise, has never failed to provide the sinews for victory in war. It has built this nation far beyond the wildest dreams of its architects; it has through the scientific means of communication closed the international geographic gap to permit rapid and effective trade and commerce among the people of the world, has elevated the laborer, the farmer and the tradesmen to their rightful station of dignity and relative prosperity, and has established the pattern for modern industrialization and scientific development.
        The first prominent component of capitalism was Karl Marx who shunned the use of violence and sought the voluntary acceptance of the principle of communal ownership of the sources and means of production. The innate common sense of the human race, however, rejected this principle and the element of force was injected by the Bolshevik after the close of the first World War. Then was combined the theory of Karl Marx with the principle of Nihilism [anarchy; revolutionary insurgency] under which the control of public policy was sought through terrorism and violence. This combination known as Communism has had many successes. The minority, the Communist Party, in many sectors of the globe has been able to establish its rule over the majority. Only where the concept of human liberty was most deeply rooted and greatly advanced were such minority pressures decisively thrown back.
        Such was the case in this nation where our economy, built upon the principle of private capitalism, became recognized as the great barrier to the universal enforcement of the theories of modern Communism. There followed repeated and diversified efforts to reduce and destroy it. Resort was had to the control of private profit by the Marxism-inspired device of confiscatory taxation and the levies upon privately accumulated resources.
        It began in this country with the Federal Income Tax Law of 1914 which gave unlimited access to the people's wealth, and the power for the first time to levy taxes not for revenue only but for social purposes. [The Communist Manifesto by Marx and Engels, 1848, Chapter II, Proletarians and Communists, plank #2: "A heavy progressive or graduated income tax."] Since then the sphere of government has increased with a kind of explosive force.
        Karl Marx, while planning the destruction of all constitutional government, said: "The surest way to overturn the social order is to debauch the currency." And the Russian dictator, Lenin, that implacable foe of the free enterprise system, predicted as early as 1920 that the United States would eventually spend itself into bankruptcy.
        Karl Marx referred, of course, to the process of inflation, induced by extreme taxation; the process of "planned economy" [known today as social engineering]; the process of controlling economic conditions and thereby controlling the lives of individuals—a control of fiscal, monetary and general economic forces which produce higher prices and a gradual devitalizing of the purchasing power of money. The continuing rise in the cost of living is due to our drift deeper and deeper into inflation [the hidden tax] until today our whole economic, social and political system is infected by an inflationary mentality. "Taxation with its offspring inflation," said Lenin, in support of the basic thesis of Karl Marx, "is the vital weapon to displace the system of free enterprise."—the system on which our nation was founded—the system which has made us the most prosperous people of all history—the system which enabled us to produce over half of the world's goods with less than one-seventeenth of the world's area and population—the system which gave our people more liberty, privileges and opportunities than any other nation ever gave its people in the long history of the world. To destroy it is the sure road to Socialism. And by Socialism is meant the forcing of a centrally controlled economic life upon all persons in the nation under an authoritarian monopoly that is politically managed. Actually, there has been through the direction of our own public policy an incessant encroachment on the capitalistic system. Most officials of our government over the past years will deny, and justifiably, any intent to establish in this nation the basis for the emergence of a Socialistic, much less a Communistic State, but the course of fiscal policy has done just that. The fact is unmistakable and clear that if the capitalistic system—free enterprise—is to be preserved to the future generations of our people, the course of government must be oriented to foster and preserve adequate incentive to encourage the thrift, the industry and the adventure which brought our nation to its present pre-eminence among all of the other nations of the earth and which alone can carry it forward in peace and security and progress.

        I realize full well that the restless spirit of the times seeks change. But change should not be made for the sake of change alone. It should be sought only to adapt time tested principles which have been proven in the crucible of human experience to the new requirements of an expanding society. To do otherwise is not true liberalism. The Constitution is not to be treated as an instrument of political expediency. Every move that is made to circumvent its spirit, every move that is made to over-centralize political power, every move that is made to curtail individual liberty is reaction in its most extreme form. For the framers of the Constitution were the most liberal thinkers of all the ages and the Charter they produced out of the liberal revolution of their time has never been and is not now surpassed in liberal thought.
        The object and practice of liberty lies in the limitation of governmental power. Through the ages the constantly expanding grasp of government has been liberty's greatest threat. Daniel Webster once said on the floor of the Senate:
        "Our security is our watchfulness of executive power. It was the Constitution of this department, which as infinitely the most difficult part in the great work of creating our present government; to give the executive department such power as should make it useful, and yet not such as should render it dangerous; to make it efficient, independent and strong, and yet to prevent it from sweeping away everything by its union of military and civil authority, by the influence of patronage, and office, and force. . . . I do not wish to impair the power of the President as it stands written down in the Constitution. But, I will not blindly confide, where all experience admonished me to be jealous; I will not trust executive power, vested in the hands of a single magistrate, to keep the vigils of liberty."
        He spoke those words 129 years ago; but they could as well have been spoken but yesterday.
        There are many who have lost faith in this early American ideal and believe in a form of socialistic, totalitarian rule, a sort of big brother deity to run our lives for us. They no longer believe that free men can successfully manage their own affairs. Their thesis is that a handful of men, centered in government, largely bureaucratic not elected, can utilize the proceeds of our toil and labor to greater advantage than those who create it. Nowhere in the history of the human race is there justification for this reckless faith in political power. It is the oldest, most reactionary of all forms of social organization. It was tried out in ancient Babylon, ancient Greece and ancient Rome; in Mussolini's Italy, in Hitler's Germany, and in all communist countries. Wherever and whenever it has been attempted, it has failed utterly to provide economic security, and has generally ended in national disaster. It embraces an essential idiocy, that individuals who, as private citizens, are not to manage the disposition of their own earnings, become in public office supermen who can manage the affairs of the world.
        The fundamental and ultimate issue at stake is liberty, itself—liberty verses the creeping socialization in every domestic field. Freedom to live under the minimum of restraint! A least common denominator of mediocrity against the proven progress of pioneering individualism! The free enterprise system or the cult of conformity! The result will determine the future of civilization. It will be felt on every human life. It will be etched in blazing rainbow colors on the very arch of the sky.

And here we are; the social engineering minority MacArthur spoke of, having been able to firmly establish its rule over the majority in this country and in most other countries throughout the world. At the time of the writing of this book, the U.S. federal government's national debt was $312 billion, and in contrast stands today (at the time of this writing) at $18 trillion, with the future prosperity of our children replaced by indentured servitude and debt slavery.

How have they been able to accomplish this? If you think about it and critically analyze the players and the agenda, you will arrive at the answer of your own volition. If not, you need to turn the television off and stop going to the movies. Stop buying the news papers and magazines of perception management, and watching the controlled mainstream news "programming" by pathologically lying "anchors" such as NBC's CFR member, Brian Williams and others in the Communist News Networks.

Read your history and research the principles and ideals upon which this great nation was founded. Then you will know how it was possible for the minority to establish its rule over the majority, because those who don't know history are doomed to repeat it, and those who George Orwell predicted were "without general ideas," whose "activities were without importance" and would allow petty distractions to "fill up the horizon of their minds" are very easy to control.

English philosopher, John Locke, known as the "Father of Classical Liberalism," espoused the view that government is morally obligated to serve the whole of the people, namely by protecting life, liberty, and property. John Adams wrote in A Defense of the American Constitutions (1787): "The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred as the laws of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence." In Essay on Property (1792), James Madison wrote that the end of government was "to protect property of every sort; as well that which lies in the various rights of individuals," and "that alone is a just government which impartially secures to every man whatever is his own." And in his first inaugural address in 1801, Thomas Jefferson said: "A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned—this is the sum of good government."

What fools these mortals be who have forgotten the fundamental conventions of our forebears.

Regarding the perpetual war scenario, MacArthur's nearly prophetic book was written shortly after the Truman-era Korean War and sandwiched between the botched Bay of Pigs invasion—co-sponsored by the CIA—which led directly to the Communist revolution in Cuba, the dissolving of Cuba's capitalist system and persecution of Christians at the hands of Castro's ruthless 26 July army. Then came the ensuing Kennedy-era missile crisis and that terrible decade of the second Indochina War.

A couple years after publication of MacArthur's Reminiscences, in 1967, the USS Liberty was bombed in Israel, killing 34 and wounding more than 170 U.S. crew members. The book predates the bloody Nixon-era campaigns in Laos and Cambodia in 1968, the war in Vietnam from 1970-1975, Lebanon in 1976, and Zaire in 1978.

It predates the Carter-era Operation Eagle Claw in Iran and Operation Bright Star in Sinai in 1980, the El Salvadorian offensive and the Libyan incident in '81.

It foreshadowed the Reagan-era Multinational Force on Lebanon from 1982-83, Operation Urgent Fury in Grenada in '83, the indefinite Persian Gulf war beginning in '84 and lasting until the present day.

It heralded the Bush-era siege of Panama from 1988-90, which resulted in the deaths of 2,000-3,000 unarmed civilians according to the Commission for the Defense of Human Rights in Central America (CODEHUCA); Operation Desert Shield beginning in 1990, and the ensuing oil wars in Iraq and Kuwait.

It portended the Clinton-era Bosnia invasion, the 1993 deployment of the U.S. military's Combat Applications Group (known in certain circles as Delta Force) to a Seventh Day Adventist church near Waco Texas where 76 men, women and children were massacred; Liberia in '96; Albania, Sierra Leone, Cambodia, the Congo and Gabon in '97; Guinea-Bissau, Kenya, Tanzania, Afghanistan, Sudan and Monrovia in '98; Kissinger's East Timor genocide and Serbia in '99, and Nigeria and Yemen in 2000.

It anticipated the second Bush-era's never-ending war in Afghanistan and the so-called "War on Terror" beginning in 2001, the Philippines and Côte d'Ivoire in '02, the war in Iraq beginning in 2003 and helping the nation to fall to Islamic terrorist regimes by 2011, counterterrorism wars in Georgia and Djibouti in '03, the Haitian coup d'état and U.S. intelligence anti-terror war underway in Georgia, Djibouti, Kenya, Ethiopia, Yemen and Eritreain; and drone-strikes in Pakistan in '04, Lebanon again in 2006, and Mogadishu and Somalia in '07.

It envisioned the Obama-era rise of the drones, Yemen again in 2010, Operation New Dawn in Iraq from 2010-11, Uganda and Libya and Somalia again in 2011; Jordan, Turkey, Chad and Benghazi in 2012; Mali, Somalia, Libya and Korea again in 2013; and Uganda and Iraq yet again in 2014.

And all of these foreign entanglements, invasions and incursions are that which account for involvement only by U.S. federal military forces, not including wars and aggressions initiated or lead by other nations.

The Gospel of Matthew chapter 24, verses 6-8 says: "And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet. For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom . . . All these are the beginning of sorrows."

At present, considering the words of social critic, Randolph Bourne, that "War is the health of the State," we have the stagings of "humanitarian interventions" (crisis-initiations) in Syria, Iran, Ukraine, Egypt, Yemen, Iraq and Afghanistan, the rising of the Islamic sword and the submission to the tyrannical Sharīʿah Law in countless nations, with players such as the Israeli Secret Intelligence Service (ISIS), the Mossad, CIA and British MI6 pitting Sunni against Shia Muslim factions (ethos against ethos) along the way.

We have the Eastern bloc coalition of BRICS nations—which represent about 3 billion people, approximately 40% of world population and a combined GDP of 20% of gross world product—uniting to form a world reserve currency to replace the 100-year global monopoly of the Rothschild-owned Bank of England and its American Federal Reserve branch. We have the United States, Britain and Germany involved in war-time economic sanctions against Russia and its allies, and Russia's many nuclear incursion threat responses into U.S. airspace heating up and increasing.

Remember that the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor IN RESPONSE to economic sanctions the United States was inflicting upon them; keeping them from acquiring essential commodities such as oil and gas, which was an act of war.

Remember also as you see and read what is currently being done with the words "Patriot", "Patriotism", and "Nationalism"; the active corruption, dishonoring and psychopolitical re-branding of these terms to associate all Freedom-loving American citizens who understand the Creator-endowed founding principles and ideals this great nation was founded upon—who teach and inspire others as to the lawful precedent and essential role of the unorganized militias of the several states—with extremism and domestic terrorism.

Maj. Gen. Smedley D. Butler, the most decorated U.S. Marine in history, said, "I spent thirty-three years and four months in active military service as a member of this country's most agile military force, the Marine Corps. I served in all commissioned ranks from Second Lieutenant to Major-General. And during that period, I spent most of my time being a high class muscle-man for Big Business, for Wall Street and for the Bankers." And, like General Butler, General MacArthur had also come to understand that he too was being used as the muscle for Marxist International Socialists who were employing the military might of the United States—through engineered wars and aggressions—for the subversion of our free enterprise capitalistic system, the overturning of our prosperous social order, the maintaining of authorized economic agreements and models, and the establishment of a global Socialistic planned economy to the benefit of its architects.

Today, "Democracy" is the code word for Socialism, and we often hear that term bandied about to describe our nation's system of government. Whereas, the United States was from the very beginning guaranteed a Constitutional Republican form of government. James Madison wrote in the Federalist #10, 1787: "Pure democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security, or the rights of property; and have, in general, been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths." Vladimir Lenin, who MacArthur described as the "implacable foe of the free enterprise system," gave form and function to the modern socialist doctrine, and said of the principle, "Democracy is indispensable to socialism."

For a taste of what Socialism looks like in its purest form, recall the Nazi regime. The National Socialist German Workers' Party (in German: Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (NSDAP)—commonly referred to in English as the Nazi Party—transformed the representative federal German Weimar Republic into a totalitarian social democracy from 1920-1945.

So, never again be deceived regarding what "democracy" means. It is the code word for socialism, was anathema to our founders and everyone from your local school teacher to the President of the United States of America is using it to refer to the socialist "planned economy" that is being erected upon the ashes of America's once-free Republic.

It was for the uncooperativeness of these incremental anti-American transformations and the subversive actions of internationalism and socialism sanctioned by our own government which he was not willing to go along with anymore, and for other disagreements, that the "insubordinate" MacArthur was dubbed "The Most Dangerous Man In America". This is why he was asked to resign by the 33rd President of the United States of America and 33rd degree Freemason and Grandmaster of the Grand Lodge of Missouri of the Scottish Rite of the Southern Jurisdiction of Freemasonry, Harry S. Truman, who unlawfully replaced the Constitution for the United States of America (on paper) with the Charter of the United Nations, the United Nations Treaty and the UN Participation Act, and who thanked the U.S. military for being an essential force of arms working not on behalf of American interests during during the Korean War, but on behalf of the United Nations.

On April 19, 1951, General Douglas MacArthur gave his now famous farewell address before the U.S. Congress, which was rather unceremoniously but lovingly interrupted by fifty ovations. He closed his nostalgic and eloquent speech with the following:

I am closing my 52 years of military service. When I joined the Army, even before the turn of the century, it was the fulfillment of all of my boyish hopes and dreams. The world has turned over many times since I took the oath on the plain at West Point, and the hopes and dreams have long since vanished, but I still remember the refrain of one of the most popular barrack ballads of that day which proclaimed most proudly that "old soldiers never die; they just fade away."

And like the old soldier of that ballad, I now close my military career and just fade away, an old soldier who tried to do his duty as God gave him the light to see that duty. 

Good Bye.

And like the old soldier of that ballad, this writer now closes this particular chapter of my online journal, a Marine who is likewise trying to do my duty as God gave me the will, the fortitude and the means; to keep this legacy of American patriotism alive to the preservation of Freedom for all people. Because as goes America, so goes the world.

CONTRIBUTE TO MY RESEARCH!

I work very hard and spend innumerable hours studying, researching and digging out the truth, which is a great cost to a husband and father. I have nothing to sell; no advertising, no contracts, no corporate partners nor sponsors. Please help me by donating the amount that you feel this information deserves. Thank you for contributing to my time and effort, and ultimately to the restoration of Liberty and Freedom for all. May God bless each and every single one of you.

Thank you! - Tim