Iron Man 3 — A Tutorial on the Orchestrated War of Terror

“Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people.” — Theodore Roosevelt, April 19, 1906

This last weekend, I went to see Iron Man 3 with my family. It was the first time in a number of months that I went forth into the Hollywood cinematic mind control propaganda matrix. Although I enjoyed time with my family, as I always do, I secretly plugged myself back into the debased Babylonian entertainment system for the purpose of observing what new abominations the enemy is currently promulgating into the minds of men.

What I witnessed before me, in all of its twists and turns, was a transparent spot-on portrayal of the modern-day playbook of tyrants: the Hagelian Dialectic. It is explained in detail here.

The universal threefold interpretive method of control, the Hagelian Dialectic, is a technique as old as politics itself, but its more modern concept was given new life by Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770-1831). It is the principle of bringing about change in a three-step process: Thesis, Antithesis and Synthesis.

From Nero fiddling while Rome burned, erecting upon its ashes the glorious Domus Aurea to honor himself; to Adolf Hitler fire-bombing his own Reichstag parliament building to blame it on his political enemies as a pretext to go to war with them; to the Bush/Cheney/Blair organization blaming the 9/11 attacks on an elusive Muslim cleric as a pretext to illegally invade Iraq and Afghanistan, the dialectic is always the same. When the people are kept in fear, liberty is always traded for security. Benjamin Franklin prophetically warned that, "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." Contrarily, the security state that is erected around the people always only benefits the orchestrators of the Thesis.

From Webster's Dictionary: "an interpretive method, originally used to relate specific entities or events to the absolute idea, in which an assertable proposition (thesis) is necessarily opposed by its apparent contradiction (antithesis), and both reconciled on a higher level of truth by a third proposition (synthesis). Also called Hegelian triad."

The first step (thesis) is to create a problem. The second step (antithesis) is to generate opposition to the problem. Ex: fear, panic and hysteria. The third step (synthesis) is to offer the solution to the problem created by step one: A change which would have been impossible to impose upon the people without the proper psychological conditioning achieved in stages one and two.

The Mandarin character in Iron Man 3 is the face of terror. His is the face the viewer associates with the acts of terrorism he takes claim to. There is no need to look beyond him for the culprit of the mayhem, as he is the stereotypical "lone-nut" who takes all the blame. No need to look past what we can see. That would be conspiracy-theorizing.

As George W. Bush remarked on November 10, 2001 of anyone who questioned the "official narrative" of 9/11, those who made any critical analysis of the evidentiary contradictions and asked questions of the discrepancies contained in the 9/11 Commission Report, "Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th; malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists, themselves, away from the guilty."

To that, famed writer Gore Vidal responded to Bush with, "Apparently, 'conspiracy stuff' is now shorthand for unspeakable truth."

Bush also declared of his fabricated axis of evil, "Either you're with us, or you're with the terrorists."

“Madness is to hold an erroneous perception and argue perfectly from it.” — Voltaire

As the Iron Man script progressed, movie-goers were introduced to an idea they may never have even considered, that the "bin-Laden" character is merely a front man of the true behind-the-scenes orchestrator of terror. The Mandarin is actually an actor, a patsy for the real terrorist: Aldrich Killian, who is an agent of the military-industrial complex.
 

Talk about an "Ah-hah" moment for the generally dumbed-down movie-going public! Could this be a catalyst of awakening for a significant number of sleeping people? I can only hope and pray so.

Back to the objective of applying the Hegelian Dialectic: it is designed primarily for the concealed change agents — in seeking to dismantle social and political structures by which free men govern themselves — ancient landmarks erected at great cost in blood and treasure. The dialectic is to emasculate sovereign states, merge nations under universal government, centralize economic powers, and control the world's people and resources. Have you read the ten planks of the communist manifesto and the 45 stated communist goals read into the congressional record in 1963?

Frederick Douglass said it best, “Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will." That is where steps one and two come into play.

It is widely understood that The Wonderful Wizard of Oz, the children's novel written by L. Frank Baum, was admittedly a work of political satire, a snapshot of the political and economic power structure of America. Oz was filled with rich allegorical and metaphorical imagery that was an historical primer on the issues that dominated the political climate of Baum's day in the 1890's. These revelations were lost on the uninformed, however, but the most striking allegory was The Wizard himself, who represented the president of the United States, whose power is ultimately illusory. The Wizard, like everybody else, was just trying to survive and was really subservient to the power of the Wicked Witch of the East (a stand-in for the Wall Street financiers, eastern elite businessmen, and Washington politicians) and of the West (western industrialists, bankers, and the railroads).

“Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!”

James Madison made it perfectly clear, “If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. Of all the enemies to public liberty, war is perhaps the most to be dreaded because it comprises and develops the germ of every other. War is the parent of armies; from these proceed debts and taxes; and armies, and debts, and taxes are the known instruments for bringing the many under the domination of the few. The loss of liberty at home is to be charged to the provisions against danger, real or imagined, from abroad.”

It is not about war; it is not about global warming; it is not about racism; it is not about guns; it is not about abortion rights or homosexual rights or recession . . . it's about Marxist Revolution. It's about CONTROL.

Rahm Emanuel, Barack Obama's Chief of Staff from 2009-2010, candidly divulged the administration's true nature and intent of the problem-reaction-solution dialectic to a Wall Street Journal conference of top corporate chief executives in November of 2008, letting America know that opportunities are never lost on the president and his regime: "You never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that it's an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before." See the video of his comment here.

George H.W. Bush explained the dialectic for the adept in his September 11, 1991 speech before a joint session of Congress: “A new partnership of nations has begun, and we stand today at a unique and extraordinary moment. Out of these troubled times, our objective—a new world order—can emerge. Today, that new world is struggling to be born, a world quite different from the one we have known.” I don't need to point out that this was spoken 10 years to the day before the attacks of September 11, 2001.

“There is a need for a new world order,” Henry Kissinger told PBS interviewer Charlie Rose in 2007, “I think that at the end of this administration, with all its turmoil, and at the beginning of the next, we might actually witness the creation of a new order – because people looking in the abyss, even in the Islamic world, have to conclude that at some point, ordered expectations must return under a different system.”

David Rockefeller said in September 23, 1994, "This present window of opportunity, during which a truly peaceful and interdependent world order might be built, will not be open for too long — We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."

"We shall have world government, whether or not we like it," said James Warburg, CFR member and son of Paul Warburg of the so-named banking dynasty and "father" of the Federal Reserve system. "The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest."
 
Media analyst Julian Darius' May 6, 2013 op-ed article, 'Why Iron Man 3 is the Best Iron Man Film to Date', published by the Sequart Research & Literacy Organization, observed these glaring revelations about the film:

Iron Man, the Mandarin, and the Military-Industrial Complex

Iron Man 3 boils down to two plots: the main plot, involving the Mandarin, and the subplot, involving Tony Stark’s reconciliation with the Iron Man part of his identity.

The main plot is bound up in the military-industrial complex and the War on Terror. In the comics, the Mandarin was originally a Fu Manchu figure, which we now recognize as a racist stereotype. The movie recasts the Mandarin as a bin Laden figure, who issues videos threatening the world after what he claims are terrorist attacks. Played by Ben Kingsley, who sports a large beard, the Mandarin is of ambiguous ethnicity. He’s accompanied by some Asian assistants and vaguely Asian iconography, but he also borrows heavily from images of Arab terrorists. All of this could be easily mishandled, in racially insensitive ways. But as it turns out (in a twist that at least superficially recalls the one at the end of Batman Begins), the Mandarin is actually a British drug-addicted actor. He’s a patsy for the real villain: Aldrich Killian, who’s part of the military-industrial complex.

Remember how some used to idly speculate that bin Laden was a U.S. plant? He could be used to justify wars, and he could release videos in time to swing elections (as a bin Laden video helped do in 2004). Of course, the idea that bin Laden was filming on an American soundstage was absurd and offensive — as well as an illustration that asking “who benefits?” is not the same thing as actual analysis. The Bush administration certainly was conspiratorial (manufacturing intelligence, intimidating “allies,” etc.), but it wasn’t nearly this smart. Still, it’s a powerful idea — and one that makes a lot more sense with a defense company as the culprit, since it’s the one with profit motive.

It’s here that Iron Man 3 offers a view of the world — and the War on Terror — that’s not only actually responsible but a major improvement over the previous two films.

The War on Terror is big business. It’s led to a tremendous increase in government. (No, not in social services, despite what you’ve heard. In intelligence and in military spending.) But it’s led to an even larger increase in defense contracts, not only for weapons systems but for rudimentary things like transportation, translators, and services like food and laundry — things that the U.S. military used to do for itself. It’s not too much to say that the Iraq War was a massive corporate charity event, with virtually everything sub-contracted out to private companies, often in no-bid contracts. Several companies routinely and illegally overbilled the Pentagon, and that’s not even considering the absurd prices they legally charged for things like laundry services. There are reports of independent contractors driving vehicles around Iraq with nothing in them, because they were paid by the mile. And then when those contractors got into combat, U.S. soldiers had to go out — and die — rescuing them. This was Iraq, and it’s so absurd and horrific that it puts anything in Apocalypse Now to shame.

It’s this — the military-industrial complex — that’s the real villain of Iron Man 3. It’s this that Killian represents.

Killian also understands the power of a Satanic figurehead — like bin Laden, or Saddam Hussein, or Manuel Noriega before him — to inspire fear. The Mandarin serves Killian’s purpose brilliantly. He can take credit for accidental explosions, caused by the Extremis process, which thus come to be understood as terrorist attacks instead of corporate accidents. Killian’s master plan is to assassinate the president, thereby having a sympathetic vice-president installed. Obviously, after the assassination of a U.S. president, the U.S. would throw money at everything military on a scale even surpassing the irrational fervor in the wake of 9/11. Companies like AIM would have it made.

And in this, we can see that the film understands the role fear plays in such military overreactions.

Continuing:

Just as the official story of 9/11 goes: that 19 men who didn't even know how to drive cars managed to somehow hijack 4 commercial airliners simultaneously, achieved intricate maneuvers which defied operational limits, crashed them into buildings in the most protected airspace in the United States under the command of an elusive cleric living in a cave in Afghanistan via a laptop and a walkie-talkie, against the systematic shutdown and failure of a $40 billion strategic defense system that has been in place since World War II . . . shall I go on?

Nor did the Mandarin have the technology, infrastructure, financial capitol and intelligence capabilities to carry out strategic bombings and hack into all the world's cable television systems simultaneously, cutting into mainstream news feeds, to proclaim his attacks to a global audience.

Someone else was carrying out the Mandarin bombings.

Someone far more intelligent, sophisticated, cunning and capable.

The real killer is Aldrich Killian, and his motivations, as they’re initially explained, are promising. He’s developing Maya Hansen’s technology, and ramping-up the War on Terror will “create supply and demand” for his latest product, a drug he’s selling to Pepper Pots as an intellectual enhancement, but that really promises to regrow the limbs of amputees.

His bombs aren’t actually bombs at all: they’re combat veterans who lost limbs, and who have been rendered unstable by high doses of Killian’s drug.

Although it’s not clear whether Killian’s motivations are profit-oriented, or merely for revenge, it is clear that his motivations are not benign, nor benevolent. Neither are the motivations of the "research" of the military-industrial complex for the security of a free State and a free people.

Killian tells Pepper that he’s spent ”years dodging the president’s ban on ‘immoral’ biotech research,” to develop Maya’s technology.

To expand the arm of the military-industrial complex is the real aim of AIM, as it is with most (if not all) government and military research.

Writing for The Huffington Post in his article 'What's the Meaning of Iron Man 3?', William Bradley writes:

"Iron Man 3 provides popcorn with a twist. A big political twist. Its threatening uber-terrorist Other, the very theatrical Mandarin, is a fake. A front, for a military-industrial complex player with an agenda to cover up trouble with his glitchy tech, create a lot more chaos in the world, and take advantage of that chaos for profit."

"...you can look at the Mandarin and say, ah-hah, false flag attacks by a part of the military-industrial complex. Killian's corporate think tank, AIM (Advanced Idea Mechanics), is funded by the military and the "Extremis" biotech he is developing turns vets into dangerous weapons."

At its foundation, Iron Man 3 suggests that the War on Terror is chasing the wrong guy; that the threat of violence by terrorist actors may be real, but the War on Terror is an invention that both terrorists and the terrorized participate in.

In another eye-opening societal parallel, Tony Stark's counterpart, Colonel James Rhodes, has been subject to a re-branding in this film. “War Machine was a little too aggressive,” Rhodes explains to Tony over beers. “This sends a better message.” And he recognizes that the use of him to hunt down the Mandarin is in part a response to the general security state erected in response to the New York attacks in The Avengers. “It’s Iron Patriot now."

"GO USA!" As liberty dies to thunderous applause.


In Conclusion:

When we independent investigators, researchers, geopolitical analysts — and those of us who justifiably question authority — question preposterous official narratives which defy all well-established data collection and investigative practices, and point out who actually stands to gain in the wake of key events, we're not talking about the postman, the low-level FBI agents or federal workers. We're talking about criminal clandestine globalist elements that are using and exploiting the government for their own purposes and agendas. We're talking about the "shadow government" that John F. Kennedy warned us about; the "technological elite" and the "military-industrial complex" that Dwight D. Eisenhower warned us about; the "Insiders" who Gary Allen warned us about in his landmark book, 'None Dare Call It Conspiracy'. The people who are on the inside — those powers-that-be who truly call the shots in this and other nations.

They represent a very small percentage of the ruling authority, have tens of billions of taxpayer dollars to play with, and command the most powerful military-industrial complex enforcement system of tyranny in the world.

Interestingly enough, the term "shadow government" didn't get widespread media publicity until after 9/11.

It's a conspiracy theory that Iran has weapons of mass destruction that could pose a threat to the United States, especially when the U.S. has proliferated over 500 WMD's. It's an even more profound conspiracy that the accusations of WMD's are hailing from the same ruling class who are merely reviving their 1970's, 80's, and 90's terror playbooks of deception, while focusing investigations only on low-IQ mind-controlled patsies as a cover. The very same people who lied about secret Soviet submarine WMD technology during the Cold War: Rumsfeld, Cheney, Wolfowitz, Kissinger and the Bush family, somehow managed to garner the same support when telling the exact same lies about Iraq.

And now we collectively fall for it again in support of yet another conflict, this time with Syria and their alleged use of chemical weapons, of which we have plenty, but they do not have the infrastructure to produce. Also with North Korea. All saber-rattling aside, they don't have the means to produce bicycles domestically, but somehow, magically, they have developed and produced a stockpile of weapons that can harness the power of the atom?

It's the same story every time, perpetrated by the same people. Problem-reaction-solution, to rebuild the state of fear for engaging yet another sovereign nation in pursuit of more control over the people and natural resources.
 
Mainstream pop culture — at least — is now openly questioning the assumptions of the War on Terror. Irregardless of the motives behind exposing the tool of tyrants, their Hegelian Dialectic playbook, the narrative is moving forward. The discussion about fabricated terror as a means of government control is out in the open.

Lets all get on board the train of questioning the never-ending "War of Terror", and pointing out the main suspect, who has been caught over and over and over again, orchestrating terror and taking advantage of chaos for profit. Take heed that you be not deceived.

Truth is the first casualty of war.

We're definitely not in Kansas anymore.

And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues. (Revelation 18:4)

I work very hard and spend countless hours researching and digging out the truth. I have nothing to sell; no advertising, no contracts, no corporate partners nor contributors. Please help me by donating the amount you feel this information deserves. Thank you for contributing to the restoration of Liberty and Freedom, and may God bless each and every single one of you.