Who Really Had Kennedy Killed? Follow the Money...

November 22nd marks the 50th anniversary of the public execution of the 35th President of the United States, John Fitzgerald Kennedy.

This is among the longest-running and most widely debated mysteries of our time, and has caused one of the greatest divisions of idealogue in modern memory. With the 50th anniversary coming up, many Americans will be sidetracked by any number of distracting discussions, and by various organizations cashing-in on the mystique with lucrative revenue-generating offerings such as licensed photos for sale, tourism, book publishing, and even shameless commemorative box sets.

Lets put all of that aside and do as any thinking individual should do when faced with unanswered questions, because as the Warren Commission proved, they did not answer the only real questions. By killing the President,

1. Who benefitted, and 2. Who stood to gain?

The Warren Commission did not officially follow the money trail, nor did they follow the evidence in answering the question of who actually killed the President. They did not employ the scientific method in ascertaining the culprit.

The Presidential National Medal of Science winner, Lynn Margulis, noted that the scientific method is to follow the facts where they lead, to adopt the theory which has the most proof, and to discard theories which are contradicted by the facts. In the case of the Warren Commission, the government-appointed members adopted theories which were backed by very little evidence, and refused to look at the most likely theories, the ones backed by overwhelming evidence.

The scientific method of adopting theories which are supported by the most evidence—no matter where the evidence leads—and rejecting theories which are not, tells us that the official conclusions of the Warren Commission report cannot possibly be accurate.

To be termed scientific, a method of inquiry must be based on empirical and measurable evidence subject to specific principles of reasoning. This method includes the following 6-part analysis:

1. Ask a question 

2. Do background research 

3. Construct a hypothesis 

4. Test your hypothesis by doing an experiment 

5. Analyze your data and draw a conclusion 

6. Report your results (Was your hypothesis correct?)

With that understood, lets jump right into a little-known and rarely debated fact of the Kennedy assassination.

In the Texas School Book Depository sniper's nest, there were five sets of fingerprints found by the Dallas Police Department. Four of them belonged to Lee Harvey Oswald. They could have been planted there, or the boxes he handled staged at the scene, since Oswald was employed at the School Book Depository.

The fifth set of fingerprints indisputably belonged to a man named Malcolm "Mac" Wallace.

Who was Malcolm Wallace? He was a convicted murderer who President Lyndon Baines Johnson personally landed a long succession of patronage jobs.

Wallace worked at the U.S. Agriculture Department, and his personal records show that he was recommended for the job by Lyndon Johnson himself.

Wallace then murdered a man named John Kinser, who was involved with Johnson's sister, Josefa Johnson. Wallace went to trial, was represented in the murder trial by John Khopher, LBJ's personal attorney, and was convicted.

After he was convicted of murder, Wallace received a five year suspended sentence for murder—which is easy to do if you're one of Johnson's appointed judges—and was immediately hired by a defense contractor called Chemco  Chemco was owned by H.D. Byrd, Chairman of the Lyndon Johnson for Senate Finance Committee. H.D. Byrd at the time owned the Texas School Book Depository.

Let that sink in for a moment...

H.D. Byrd was a very eccentric oil billionaire. His cousin, Harry F. Byrd, was also a close associate of Lyndon Johnson, and refused to endorse John Kennedy for president in 1960, even though he was the sitting democratic senator of Virginia. Harry Byrd was the only member of the 1960 senate democratic caucus who would not endorse JFK.

Four years later, running against one of Harry Byrd's closest friends, Barry Goldwater, Byrd stumped Virginia for Lyndon Johnson, and a famous Corbis photo was taken of Johnson kissing Byrd's hand.

Johnson and the Byrd oil family were very close allies, and the reason this is important is because Harry Byrd was the chairman of the senate congressional committee with oversight over the Central Intelligence Agency. Harry Byrd controlled every penny of the CIA budget, and Johnson was on the same congressional oversight committee when he was in the Senate. Together, Johnson and Byrd helped found the CIA, and held congressional oversight over it.

Together, Johnson and Byrd were also on the Senate Armed Services Committee, where Johnson's friend, Byrd, made decisions about who received the big defense contracts.

Here's the kicker, Malcolm Wallace went to work for Chemco. His fingerprints were found in the Texas School Book Depository. As soon as Johnson was sworn-in as President, Chemco was given a then-unprecedented $4 billion defense contract. So, H.D. Byrd got his payoff.

Malcolm Wallace killed eight people—nine if you include Kennedy—and he left fingerprints to prove it.

All of the major Texas newspapers at the time reported on Kinser's involvement with Johnson's sister Josefa, his murder, Wallace's conviction and his long employment record helped along by Johnson. In fact, after Wallace murdered Kinser in broad daylight at a mini-golf course in front of eyewitnesses, he was apprehended, and according to the affidavit of the police officer who arrested him, Wallace said,

"You can't arrest me. I work for Senator Johnson."

Lyndon Baines Johnson had the means, the motive, the modus operandi, the manpower and the official cover to have John F. Kennedy assassinated. It has come out since Johnson's death that he had other opponents murdered who were involved in organized crime and election fraud during his rise to political power. 

There was a time in Washington that nothing came in or out without the "ruthless" Lyndon Johnson getting a piece of the action. He was known by close associates to be receiving briefcases full of payoff money under the table, before and during his presidency. He was so eccentric, so corrupt, so vicious and so debased, that one of his Secret Service personnel once said of Johnson, that if he wasn't the president, he would be locked up in an insane asylum.

Johnson knew that he would never make the presidency with the Kennedy dynasty in power. After all, Bobby Kennedy's Justice Department had been cracking down on Johnson's business partners in organized crime, and investigating his involvement. Johnson had been receiving $55,000.00 per month from the mob in Dallas by Jack Halfer, who was a known bagman for Carlos Marcello, the mob boss over Texas and Louisiana.

The Kennedy's knew that Johnson was a recipient of mob monies, and word got back to Johnson that the Kennedy's had already begun telling close associates that Johnson would never again be allowed on the vice presidential or presidential tickets. After all, it was widely known by the mob that as soon as LBJ was President, he promised that all of the US Justice Department wire taps of organized crime figures would be immediately terminated.

The Kennedy's knew this, and Johnson had only a short amount of time until he was not only put out of business and run out of Washington, but indicted on multiple felony convictions and sentenced to federal prison. He knew that's where this was headed with the Kennedy's at the helm.

That brings us to Jack Ruby. He had connections to Carlos Marcello as a button man, a low-level operative for the mob. Ruby was permitted to operate his club in Dallas, having had to make payments to the organization himself.

Richard Nixon at the time believed that Oswald killed Kennedy, because that's what Johnson associate J. Edgar Hoover had told him. Nixon believed Johnson, until the moment he saw a jack Ruby kill Lee Harvey Oswald, whereupon he turned to his aide, Nick Ruey, turned white as a ghost, and said, "I know that guy."

Fast-forward to 1985, author Roger Stone asked Nixon about the Kennedy assassination, and Nixon responded:

"The hell of the thing is, I knew this Ruby fellow, went by the name Rubinstein. He was one of Johnson's boys. Murray Shatner [Nixon aide], brought Ruby to me in '47, said Lyndon wanted us to put him on the payroll as a courtesy, and we did."

The FBI records from 1947 indeed show a Jack Rubinstein of Chicago as a paid informant for Richard Nixon's House Committee, a courtesy for his close friend Lyndon Johnson.

Lee Harvey Oswald did not have the means or the motive to kill Kennedy. When Kennedy came home to Johnson's Texas territory of organized crime and corrupt allies, Johnson hatchet man Malcolm "Mac" Wallace, who had already proven to be a killer, was awaiting orders. Whereas Oswald, a former U.S. Marine who was only an average sharpshooter, had never officially killed anyone. Even his fellow Marines recalled that Oswald was a very poor shot.

Nelson Delgado said Oswald on the firing line was "a pretty big joke." And Sherman Cooley, another Marine, said "If I had to pick one man in the entire United States to shoot me, I’d pick Oswald. I saw the man shoot. There’s no way he could have ever learned to shoot well enough to do what they accused him of doing in Dallas."

Who was responsible for the removal of JFK's protective bubble top that day? Here's what we know today:

Bill Moyers, who is a current liberal media talking head and former ordained minister, was an aide to Vice President Johnson in 1963. The Secret Service reported that Bill Moyers went to them before the Dallas motorcade and told them, "The president wants this damned bubble top removed now!" Funny talk for an ordained minister, but Kennedy aides Jerry Bruno and Kenny O'Donnell later testified to the Warren Commission that President John Kennedy gave no such order regarding the removal of the bubble top.

Well, we know who didn't give that order, but we have a pretty good idea who did. Whoever did give that order was he who had the means, the motive and the manpower to kill the president; he who benefitted and stood to gain from the outcome.

The main question is why. That is one of the three pertinent questions that must be asked and answered:

1. Why was he killed? 

2. Who benefitted? 

3. Who had the power to cover it up?

The logistics of the assassination seem to be merely the scenery and window dressing for the public. The reason WHY he was killed isn't ever deeply debated, only the how and the who. Also, consider that during the 9/11 Commission, only the HOW was addressed in the commission's findings. Both the WHO and the Why were not pursued.

Mere window dressing for the public to keep them occupied debating meaningless contrived facts and circumstances, which distract from the real fundamental issues.

Progressive logician Noam Chomsky revealed it best:

"The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum...."

Wallace, Oswald, Ruby, Cuba, the Mafia, Kennedy's Secret Service driver William Greer, the CIA, E. Howard Hunt, George H.W. Bush's coordinated hit team, etc. All of this keeps the people from asking the most important two questions:

WHY was he killed, and WHO stood to gain the most from his death?

A majority of real investigative journalists are convinced that the real reason Kennedy was killed, was because of his attempt to strip the Federal Reserve Bank of its power to loan money to the government at interest. On June 4, 1963 with the stroke of a pen, John Kennedy signed Executive Order 11110, which returned to the U.S. government the power to issue currency, non-interest bearing United states Notes, without going through the Federal Reserve. The ramifications of this bill were enormously detrimental to the powers that be, to the tune of issuing into circulation nearly $4.3 billion in U.S. Notes:

One thing is for sure, Kennedy was very dangerous to the establishment. He was a threat to the status quo and to the monied interests of the Washington and Wall Street elite.

Another president was also a very big threat to the establishment and was assassinated under similar circumstances in 1865. Abraham Lincoln also attempted to print American money for the American people, "Greenbacks", seizing control of the issuance of currency from the money-changers. Is it plausible that Lincoln was assassinated for interfering in the revenue stream of the monied interests. Not only is it plausible, it is very likely.

Another likely reason Kennedy could have been killed was due to his jaw-dropping 1961 "Secret Societies" speech to the National Press Club, in which he launched a major effort to rout out and expose the shadow government working in secret to seize power, the "monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence."

It can only be loosely debated that Lee Harvey Oswald did not benefit in the slightest degree from killing the president.

Oswald unfortunately died the very next day at the hands of Johnson bag man Jack Rubinstein, never being allowed to testify in his own defense and officially refute his guilt, thereby forever tying up tha loose end.

Notwithstanding, forever turned out to be too long...

Lyndon Johnson Rescinded Executive Order 11110



Executive Order 11110 is widely reputed to have been rescinded by President Lyndon Baines Johnson aboard Air Force One while flying from Dallas to Washington, the very same day President Kennedy was assassinated.

The president can amend or retract an executive at any time. The president may also issue an executive order superseding an existing one. New incoming presidents may choose to retain the executive orders issued by their predecessors, replace them with new ones of their own, or revoke the old ones completely. And in extreme cases, Congress may pass a law that alters an executive order, and they can be declared unconstitutional and vacated by the Supreme Court.

Here is an interesting excerpt from the book by John Ham, Blue Star Over China, page 157:

"And guess what, President Lara?" asked young Tom, knowing that Lara would already know this. "Executive Order 11110 was rescinded by Lyndon Baines Johnson on Air Force 1 on his flight from Dallas to Washington the very same day that JFK, President for the People, died!" Oh Wow! So, take care, President Lara, please take care, Dear!" The seventeen year old Thomas Jefferson was suddenly and seriously paternal. "The world bankers got Abe Lincoln, they got John Fitzgerald, so they'll try to get you too, maybe, some day."

John F. Kennedy spoke openly of abolishing the de-facto Federal Reserve and kicking out the secret societies. Whereas Lyndon B. Johnson was in league with them. There is no question about that

All of what was done in darkness is coming to light. Our sins always find us out.

For the love of money is the root of ALL evil.

The Holy Scriptures give us consistent warnings that things done in this life in darkness will be brought to light by God in the day of judgment.

For nothing is hidden, except to be revealed; nor has anything been secret, but that it would come to light. (Mark 4:22)

Therefore judge nothing before the time, until the Lord come, who both will bring to light the hidden things of darkness, and will make manifest the counsels of the hearts. (1 Corinthians 4:5)

Fear them not therefore: for there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; and hid, that shall not be known. (Matthew 10:26)

I said to myself, God will bring into judgment both the righteous and the wicked, for there will be a time for every activity, a time to judge every deed. (Ecclesiastes 3:17)

For God shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether [it be] good, or whether [it be] evil. (Ecclesiastes 12:14)

This will take place on the day when God judges people's secrets through Jesus Christ, as my gospel declares. (Romans 2:16)

That's a sobering thought for all of us to remember.

I work very hard and spend countless hours researching and digging out the truth. I have nothing to sell; no advertising, no contracts, no corporate partners nor contributors. Please help me by donating the amount you feel this information deserves. Thank you for contributing to the restoration of Liberty and Freedom, and may God bless each and every single one of you.