"The majority is never right. Never. That's one of those social myths that every free and intelligent man must fight. Who are the majority in a country? Why, the fools are!" — Henrik Ibsen, 'An Enemy of the People' (1882)
In a rousing speech which is sure to inspire pro-gun rights advocates
across the nation — and enrage those who choose to infringe upon the Second
Amendment — Mike Vanderboegh took to the Connecticut State Capital
yesterday. Speaking at the Connecticut Citizens Defense League’s Second
Amendment rally, Vanderboegh — one of the men who broke the Fast & Furious debacle, declared “civil war is starring us in the face.”
Drawing
parallels between the American Revolution and current infringements on
the U.S. Constitution, Vanderboegh asked the enthusiastic crowd, “Where
does it all stop? When we are all disarmed slaves?” Urging “armed civil
disobedience,” the 3-Percenter recounted events that led to the ‘shot
heard ‘round the world,’ and the American colonists who actively opposed
British forces.
Equating President Obama to King George III,
Vanderboegh went on to implore the pro-gun crowd: “Defy! Resist! Evade!
Smuggle!”
I work very hard and spend countless hours researching and digging out the truth.
I have nothing to sell; no advertising, no contracts, no corporate partners nor contributors.
Please help me by donating the amount you feel this information deserves.
Thank you for contributing to the restoration of Liberty and Freedom,
and may God bless each and every single one of you.
When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn. (Proverbs 29:2)
WATERTOWN, MA —
On Friday, April 19, 2013, during a manhunt for a bombing suspect,
police and federal agents spent the day storm-trooping people's homes and
performing illegal searches and seizures.
Thousands of law-abiding citizens' unalienable rights were infringed upon, an entire town held under siege, by one 19-year-old man who was suspected of terror. I submit that the real terror was inflicted by the gestapo-like tactics of the federalized law enforcement, the armed enforcers of tyranny.
While it was unclear initially if the home
searches were voluntary, it is now crystal clear that they were
absolutely NOT voluntary. Police were filmed ripping people from their
homes at gunpoint, marching the residents out with their hands raised in
submission, and then storming the homes to perform their illegal
searches. Guilty until proven innocent.
This was part of a larger operation that involved a total
lock-down of the suburban neighbor to Boston. Roads were barricaded and
vehicle traffic was prohibited. A No-Fly Zone was declared over the
town. People were "ordered" to stay indoors. Businesses were told not to
open. In defiance of Posse Comitatus, armed National Guard soldiers helped with the lock-down, and were
photographed checking IDs of pedestrians on the streets. "Papers, please." All the while,
militarized police were performing these disgusting house-to-house searches.
Most disturbingly of all, were the systematic house-to-house raids
performed throughout the town. SWAT teams swept the streets, raiding
citizens' homes one at a time. Homeowners would answer the door to
officers with guns drawn and would be told to immediately exit the
property with their hands up. Everyone from the homes would be "rescued"
(forcibly removed) and searched as they came out of their homes, men, women and children, often
barefoot and half-dressed.
Police would then enter the property and
begin their illegal searches.
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which was
adopted as a response to the abuse by the government of the writ of
assistance as a type of general search warrant guarding AGAINST
unreasonable searches and seizures, clearly reads as follows:
The right of
the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects,
against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and
no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or
affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and
the persons or things to be seized.
No American can ever again say that, "it can't happen here."
It IS happening. Why? Because we have traded our Liberty for Security. We have given over our personal responsibility and entrusted our self-preservation and self-reliance to reprobate minds.
"Suspicion is a virtue as long as its object is the public good, and as
long as it stays within proper bounds. ... Guard with jealous attention
the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel.
Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever
you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined." — Patrick Henry
I work very hard and spend countless hours researching and digging out the truth.
I have nothing to sell; no advertising, no contracts, no corporate partners nor contributors.
Please help me by donating the amount you feel this information deserves.
Thank you for contributing to the restoration of Liberty and Freedom,
and may God bless each and every single one of you.
by Simon Black April 24, 2013 George Town, Penang, Malaysia
When
you’ve got a guy like Senator John McCain who says “The battlefield is
the United States of America,” it tells you that almost nothing is safe
in the Land of the Free.
Whatever remains of civil liberties is going to feel the full brunt of the state’s boot heel. They’re
already regulating some of the most fundamental aspects of life, from
how we are allowed to educate our children to what we can / cannot put
in our bodies to the very nature of money.
People are forced to
hold their savings in insolvent banks backed by insolvent insurance
funds backed by insolvent governments. And those insolvent governments
have demonstrated that they are perfectly willing to directly confiscate
accounts.
Retirement funds have proven to be an easy, tempting
target. A number of countries including Argentina, Ireland, and Hungary
have appropriated private pensions. Even the US government temporarily
dipped into federal employee pensions.
Western governments are
making every possible effort to take over the Internet. Despite every
previous attempt (SOPA, PIPA, etc.) failing due to public outcry, they
keep trying and trying (ACTA, CISPA, etc.).
They’re raising
taxes, creating new ones (including Maryland’s new ‘rain tax’), imposing
capital controls, racking up debt, and rapidly devaluing their
currencies.
It all reeks of desperation, and...
It’s all so obvious. At least, for anyone paying attention.
Unfortunately
it’s easy to lose sight of the truth. After all, how can there be any
economic problems when the stock market is at an ‘all-time high’ and
Nobel Prize winning pseudo-scientists tell us that debt levels don’t
matter?
Truth is, these enormous challenges shouldn’t be ignored.
The entire global financial system is sitting on a bed of dynamite.
Central bankers are dousing the pile with gasoline while politicians are
standing around smoking.
The potential for epic disaster cannot be understated.
This
is not to say that the world is coming to an end. Far from it. History
is quite generous with past examples of once-great civilizations that
collapsed under the weight of their own hubristic debt.
Things didn’t end. They changed. Simple. And that’s what’s happening now in a textbook fashion.
Governments
in trouble almost ALWAYS resort to the same destructive tactics.
When
things are clearly on the decline, rather than INCREASING freedom and
opportunity, they try to control EVERYTHING.
We’re already seeing the early stages of this with competitive devaluation, basic capital controls, and bank withdrawal limits.
These
will soon give way to wider capital controls, increased border
controls, wage and price controls, asset confiscation, and more.
It
only delays the inevitable. The more they control, the more rapid the
deterioration becomes. Again, this isn’t some sensationalist prediction;
it is the very common historical trend.
The other thing that
history shows us, however, is that there are always a handful of people
who see the writing on the wall and take action. And that action has
almost universally involved looking abroad and diversifying
internationally.
This is a time-tested strategy that was once
available only to the wealthy landed class. But with modern air
transport, digital communication, and global competition, solutions are
now available to just about anyone.
I’ll be honest with you –
moving one’s assets, business, and even family overseas isn’t easy.
These are complicated topics with numerous tax, financial, and
professional implications. So go carefully and rationally.
But
when structured properly, history shows that a well-informed offshore
strategy can have a generational impact should chaos ensue.
And, should nothing ever go wrong in the world, you won’t be worse off for it.
"Political
language . . . is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder
respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind." ~
George Orwell
Events in Boston this past week are a reminder of
the failures of intelligence that have infected this country in recent
years. I am not referring to the inadequacy of government agencies that
have been given hundreds of billions of dollars, and have usurped
police-state powers, to discover and prevent violent attacks upon
Americans. So-called "intelligence" agencies have – like such other
government programs as schools, police, health-care – demonstrated a
systemic incapacity to perform their work, for which their pleas for
more money and more authority are met by a public failure to learn from
Einstein’s oft-quoted observation:
"Insanity is doing the same thing
over and over and expecting different results."
No, the
shortcoming of intelligence to which I refer is to be found in the minds
of most Americans who long ago rejected the burden of living with a
highly-energized, focused awareness not only of themselves, but of the
world in which they live. To let others bear this responsibility –
particularly those who will insist upon extended power over them –
reflects what Walter Kaufmann defined as "decidophobia," the fear of
making decisions for oneself. It is this transfer of existential energy
from individuals to those eager to exercise power over others, that
sustains political systems. I have long thought that the motto "In God
We Trust" should be replaced on government currency by the more apt
phrase:
"Ignorance Is Bliss."
Otherwise intelligent people – far
more capable of making life-enhancing decisions for themselves than can
any cadre of well-intentioned philosopher kings, PhD recipients, social
workers, or think-tank "experts" – abandon their lives to institutional
authorities and their media/academic propagandizers. Such voices do more
than simply answer questions that people have; they define the range of
questions it is considered appropriate to ask. It is this process that
created "politically-correct" thinking.
In recent weeks we have
been subjected to an overabundance of insincerity coming largely from
politicians. The murder of twenty small children at a school in
Connecticut, followed by the recent bombing at the Boston Marathon, has
produced genuine sadness among millions of ordinary people who empathize
with those suffering from such brutal behavior. Such feelings, alas,
did not translate into comparable sentiments on behalf of the twenty-one children massacred at Waco in 1993 by government forces; the tens of
thousands of victims of American bombings in the Middle East; nor cries
of righteous indignation for the prosecution of government officials
responsible for such heinous crimes.
The Machiavellian sentiments
of President Obama’s former chief of staff – and now Chicago mayor –
Rahm Emanuel, remind members of the political establishment to "never let a serious crisis go to waste." One after another, politicians
descended upon Boston in an opportunistic frenzy designed to reinforce
the vertically-structured model upon which political systems are based;
systems that had failed miserably to provide their promised protection.
The
state is comprised of such a network of lies and contradictions, that
it is unreasonable for us to expect truth to come from the mouths of its
politicians and other officials. Indeed, one could almost take any
statement uttered by such scoundrels, reverse its meaning, and arrive at
the truth of what policies are being promoted. I am reminded of the
phrase, popular in England, that:
"One should not accept something as
true until it has been officially denied."
Perhaps the most unfocused babbling came from former
Massachusetts Senator Scott Brown, who faithfully gurgled the party line
that terrorists want to destroy our way of life as free people. There
was no break in his non-stop jabbering occasioned by the utter
contradiction between his words and the reality taking place in Boston.
He assured his listeners that Americans will go about their daily lives
as they always have, a statement made during martial law imposed on Boston; with businesses, schools, and transportation facilities closed,
and people ordered to stay within their homes; with tank-like vehicles
prowling residential neighborhoods and police officers going
house-to-house harassing residents. Perhaps this man had in mind that
the Bostonian police-state is now part of the American tradition to
which we shall all respond with our unquestioning obedience!
This
erstwhile solon did pause to remind one-and-all that Boston was the
birthplace of "freedom" in America, a thought difficult to reconcile
with the mob mentality exhibited on television by so many of its
residents. What lover of individual liberty does not harken to the likes
of Sam Adams, John Hancock, Josiah Warren, Paul Revere, and Lysander
Spooner; voices long since drowned out by such modern Tories as the
Kennedys, George H.W. Bush, Mitt Romney, John Kerry, and, of course,
Scott Brown.
Who did plan for and carry out these vicious
killings and maimings in Boston? This is a question that will doubtless
be shoved to the back-burner in political and media babblings. Those who
still cling to such antiquated "technicalities" as due process of law,
trial by jury, and (gasp!) clear evidence of criminal wrongdoing, will
continue to be frustrated by such modern practitioners of Red Queen
jurisprudence as Attorney General Eric Holder, who has informed us that "The Constitution guarantees due process, not judicial process." It is
enough that someone, somewhere, comes to a decision as to guilt or
innocence and – as the untried prisoners at Guantanamo have learned –
without being inconvenienced by attorneys, who will insist upon such
niceties as examining evidence and witnesses.
The modern
standards for "due process" are now in the hands of Madame Defarge and
Judge Roy Bean. So many Bostonians have articulated the premise "verdict
first, trial later," joining with government officials and their media
cheerleaders to declare the two accused brothers "guilty" without the
necessity of any formal trial system. These young men began as
"suspects," and their status quickly morphed into "criminals,"
"scumbags," and any other handy epithets.
"Truth is the first casualty of war."
It has long been said
that "truth is the first casualty of war," a proposition that has
metastasized its way throughout all aspects of state action. "Truth" is
now negotiable, and a lie will serve as an adequate substitute as long
as a sufficient number of people believe it. Facts that stand in the way
of ends sought by the state must be repressed and shoved down the
memory-hole. Those who raise questions that do not fit within the
official script will be labeled "paranoid conspiracy advocates," making
it easy for the normally-neurotic to take comfort in their ignorance.
No
decent person can defend these murderous acts, any more than they can
the bombing deaths carried out by the United States in such places as
Afghanistan and Iraq. But though guilt of wrongdoing by bombing victims
in the Middle East matters little to most Americans, it would be nice if
guilt on the part of the Boston accused could be established with more
certainty than the fiat pronouncements of politicians and media hacks.
In
ferreting out the perpetrators of these recent atrocities, it would do
well to begin with the question handed down to us by ancient Romans, but
is considered improper by well-conditioned minds: cui bono (i.e., who
benefited?). Sound reasoning would demand such an inquiry in order to
arrive at possible motives for the crimes. This does not mean that those
who stood to benefit were, in fact, the wrongdoers; only that it sets
up more focused questions to ask.
Who
benefited?
The federal government and,
particularly, the FBI has been involved in many "sting" operations in
which its agents have lured unsuspecting victims into criminal –
including "terrorist" – acts in order to arrest them. A variant on what
has long been known as "provocateuring," FBI agents have provided fake
weapons and explosives and, on some occasions, have driven the sting
victim to the scene of his intended crime. In a 2012 New York Times article, it was reported that:
"Of the 22 most frightening plans for
attacks since 9/11 on American soil, 14 were developed in sting
operations."
Did the FBI – or any other government agency – help
to engineer this attack in Boston? Obviously, I do not know, but I do
know how to ask relevant questions, and this is one upon which
intelligent minds should insist. One of the experienced marathon
runners, Alastair Stevenson, reported that, at the start of this
marathon, "there were people on the roof looking down onto the Village
at the start. There were dogs with their handlers going around sniffing
for explosives, and we were told on a loud announcement that we
shouldn’t be concerned and that it was just a drill." Stevenson added
that he had never experienced anything like this in previous marathons
in which he ran.
Why were such exercises being undertaken, and
why did they fail to prevent the very harm they were presumably set up
to address? Were the bomb blasts part of the "drill?" Were the bombs
part of a "sting" operation that went awry and inadvertently exploded?
Or, were the accused young men acting wholly on their own? Their mother has stated that her older son "was controlled by the FBI, like for
three, five years. . . . They were controlling every step of him."
Our
understanding of what caused these terrible crimes in Boston will
depend upon the quality – and the range – of the questions brought to
the inquiry. No doubt another whitewash "investigation" will be
undertaken by a "blue-ribbon" committee chosen by the political
establishment. This committee will, like its predecessors, do its
appointed job of calming the public herd and urging an extension of
government authority to police an already overly-policed populace. But
independent journalists, along with men and women who use the Internet
and other technologies to communicate their searches for truth, may find
out more than we have thus far learned from babbling politicians and
make-believe journalists.
Butler Shaffer teaches at the Southwestern University School of Law. He is the author
of the newly-released In Restraint of Trade: The Business Campaign
Against Competition, 1918–1938, Calculated Chaos: Institutional Threats
to Peace and Human Survival, and Boundaries of Order. His latest book is
The Wizards of Ozymandias.
I work very hard and spend countless hours researching and digging out the truth.
I have nothing to sell; no advertising, no contracts, no corporate partners nor contributors.
Please help me by donating the amount you feel this information deserves.
Thank you for contributing to the restoration of Liberty and Freedom,
and may God bless each and every single one of you.
S. 716 was pushed through the Senate by Harry Reid, approved by the House and signed by the President on April 15th, 2013, as America was
distracted by the Boston Marathon bombing. All over the span of two working days.
And the media gave Harry Reid, the president and the rest of the Congress another pass as our attention was diverted.
Read the bill to find out what's in
it after it was passed and is now a law:
S.716 — To modify the requirements under the STOCK Act
regarding online access to certain financial disclosure statements and
related forms. (Considered and Passed Senate – CPS)
S 716 CPS
113th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. 716
To
modify the requirements under the STOCK Act regarding online access to
certain financial disclosure statements and related forms.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
April 11, 2013
Mr. REID introduced the following bill; which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed
On Monday, April 15, 2013, the President signed into law:
S.
716, which eliminates the requirement in the STOCK Act to make
available on official websites the financial disclosure forms of
employees of the executive and legislative branches other than the
President, the Vice President, Members of and candidates for Congress,
and several specified Presidentially nominated and Senate-confirmed
officers; and delays until January 1, 2014, the date by which systems
must be developed that enable public access to financial disclosure
forms of covered individuals.
It is clear that our federal government is above the law — their
law. They write the laws for the rest of us, which they are exempt from. People cannot be free in a country with a two-tiered justice
system; with no checks and balances, no deterrents or accountability.
It is times like these when you truly have to ask yourself:
"Who benefits?"
In
ancient Greece, the Senate would ask among themselves, "Cui bono" ("to
whose benefit?", literally "as a benefit to whom?"), also rendered as
cui prodest, a Latin adage that is used either to suggest a hidden
motive or to indicate that the party responsible for something may not
be who it appears at first to be.
Commonly the phrase is used to
suggest that the person or people guilty of committing a crime may be
found among those who have something to gain, chiefly with an eye toward
financial gain. The party that benefits may not always be obvious or
may have successfully diverted attention to a scapegoat, for example.
The
Roman orator and statesman Marcus Tullius Cicero, in his speech Pro
Roscio Amerino, section 84, attributed the expression cui bono to the
Roman consul and censor Lucius Cassius Longinus Ravilla:
L. Cassius
ille quem populus Romanus verissimum et sapientissimum iudicem putabat
identidem in causis quaerere solebat 'cui bono' fuisset.
"The
famous Lucius Cassius, whom the Roman people used to regard as a very
honest and wise judge, was in the habit of asking, time and again, 'To
whose benefit?'"
The US government falsely accused Spain in 1898 of blowing up the USS Maine, in order to generate support from the American people for the
Spanish-American War, sparking the famous slogan, "Remember the Maine -
to hell with Spain."
Over 1,100 pages
of de-classified Vietnam-era transcripts revealed that senators knew
the Gulf of Tonkin incident was a staged act of false flag terror
promulgated to enter the war in Vietnam.
In 1962, the US Joint
Chiefs of Staff unanimously proposed state-sponsored acts of terrorism
on American soil, AGAINST American citizens, called Operation Northwoods. The head of every branch of
the US armed forces gave written approval to sink US Navy ships, shoot
down hijacked American planes, and gun-down and bomb civilians on the
streets of Washington, D.C. and Miami as a pretext to invade Cuba.
Who benefits? When you answer this question, you have your culprit.
I work very hard and spend countless hours researching and digging out the truth.
I have nothing to sell; no advertising, no contracts, no corporate partners nor contributors.
Please help me by donating the amount you feel this information deserves.
Thank you for contributing to the restoration of Liberty and Freedom,
and may God bless each and every single one of you.
Today's bombing at the Boston Marathon comes as no surprise to awake, informed American patriots. Today, Monday, April 15, 2013, is "Patriots Day".
In
Massachusetts, 236 years after the famous “Shot heard ‘round the
world,” residents and visitors celebrate the momentous Battles of
Lexington and Concord. Patriots Day, the state holiday established in
1969 to commemorate the opening battles of the American Revolutionary
War.
Festivities stretch over the entire weekend with parades,
reenactments and commemorative ceremonies in Boston, Lexington, Concord
and surrounding towns.
To any informed American, this day was understandably chosen with specificity.
According
to a new intelligence report from the Southern Poverty Law Center, a
left-leaning nonprofit that monitors groups it deems hateful and
extremist, the number of radical anti-government “Patriot” and militia
groups in the U.S. soared to an all-time high last year.
“We are
seeing a real and rising threat of domestic terrorism as the number of
far-right anti-government groups continues to grow at an astounding
pace,” Mark Potok, a senior fellow at the center and the author of the
report, said in a statement. “It is critically important that the
country take this threat seriously. The potential for deadly violence is
real, and clearly rising.”
The SPLC also sent a letter to
Attorney General Eric Holder and Department of Homeland Security
Secretary Janet Napolitano on March 5, 2013 urging the government to
establish a task force to investigate the supposed domestic terror
threat posed by the likes of Alex Jones, We Are Change, Oath Keepers,
the Constitution Party, the Tyranny Response Team and thousands of other
Americans outside of the orbit of the establishment.
The letter
sent by the president and CEO of the SPLC, J. Richard Cohen, begins by
reminding Holder and Napolitano that the organization “wrote Attorney
General Janet Reno about the growing threat of domestic terrorism” prior
to the Oklahoma City bombing in October, 1994.
“Today, we write
to express similar concerns. In the last four years, we have seen a
tremendous increase in the number of conspiracy-minded, anti-government
groups as well as in the number of domestic terrorist plots.” Today’s
“ominous threats,” Cohen warns, come from citizens concerned about
federal government attacks on the Second Amendment. “Because of the
looming dangers, we urge you to establish an inter-agency task force to
assess the adequacy of the resources devoted to responding to the
growing threat of non-Islamic domestic terrorism.”
The Southern Poverty Law Center “is very adept at creating the specter
that armed groups will overthrow the government or that the continuously
dying supremacy movement is lurking behind every rock,” said Bill Hahn in a
statement to USA Today. “The SPLC will continue to utilize fear to fill
their bank accounts.”
You can view the list of 1,274 groups the SPLC has despicably identified as "anti-government" — including several Tea Party organizations — here. According to the SPLC, "Generally, Patriot groups define themselves as opposed to the “New World
Order,” engage in groundless conspiracy theorizing, or advocate or
adhere to extreme anti-government doctrines. Listing here does not imply
that the groups themselves advocate or engage in violence or other
criminal activities, or are racist."
It considers
returning veterans, Second Amendment advocates, and anti-immigration
activists on par with white supremacists and other ultra-fringe groups
(many that have been reported at length to have been infiltrated by the FBI). The establishment
attack on opposition political activists cannot succeed without this
necessary process of demonization and political ostracism hyped by its
media. Don't forget the April 28, 2012 article by the New York Times, Terrorist Plots, Helped Along by the F.B.I., which exposed the many domestic
terror dramas that were facilitated by the Federal Bureau of
Investigation, whose undercover agents and informers posed as terrorists
in the plots to admittedly help them along to fruition.
Also worth noting, more recently, the Federal Emergency Management Agency will participate
in Eagle Horizon 2013 on April 18, a National Continuity Program with
the slogan, "Are You Ready?"
"EH 2013 will be a one day,
internally evaluated exercise consisting of tabletop exercises testing
the readiness and capabilities to execute continuity operations and
prepare for EH 2014." Today's bombing sends a clear message: Death to Patriots.
It would appear that the opening battle of the second American
Revolutionary War have begun.
Only
time will tell who the establishment blames this act of domestic terror
on in its "official story." However, we can assuredly assess that based on recent acts of domestic
terror, namely the Newtown, Connecticut shooting, the culprit(s) will be "revealed" very soon, most likely before any thorough investigation can be launched or concluded, or before any credible eyewitnesses can be vetted or any evidence can be gathered and examined.
It will most certainly be falsely blamed on domestic patriot groups, an Oklahoma City bombing redux.
This attack profile is a self-fulfilling prophecy for the elite social engineers, the "military-industrial complex" that Dwight D. Eisenhower warned us about in his January 17, 1961 farewell address, the "secret societies" that make "secret oaths" in "secret proceedings", which John F. Kennedy warned us about in his speech to the American Newspaper Publishers Association on April 27, 1961, the speech which arguably cost him his life.
It will undoubtedly be used to take away more of our individual rights, to assert a stronger death-grip on our domestic liberty in the name of security, and will be used by the collaborator media to generate an ever-growing atmosphere of fear over the general American populace that has grown weary of the current regime's campaign of fear in the never-ending so-called "war on terror".
Never forget that the foreign terror organization, Al Qaeda, which was used to take away your rights after the 9/11 attacks, is currently not even on the radar of homeland security. Then again, perhaps it never really was in the first place. After all, its origins rest firmly in the CIA's program to arm and finance the Afghan mujahideen during the Soviet war in Afghanistan from 1979 to 1989. For more on the origins of promulgated Islamic terror to establish a domestic control grid in the U.S., research Operation Cyclone.
Also, to learn more about how terror plots are engineered as an interpretive method of control to generate a "problem-reaction-solution" scenario which is designed to benefit only the engineer of the crisis, research the Hagelian Dialectic. Stay vigilant and watchful, because anything can happen.
“Fear is the foundation of most governments; but it is so sordid and
brutal a passion, and renders men in whose breasts it predominates so
stupid and miserable, that Americans will not be likely to approve of
any political institution which is founded on it”
—John Adams
I work very hard and spend countless hours researching and digging out the truth.
I have nothing to sell; no advertising, no contracts, no corporate partners nor contributors.
Please help me by donating the amount you feel this information deserves.
Thank you for contributing to the restoration of Liberty and Freedom,
and may God bless each and every single one of you.
I work very hard and spend countless hours researching and digging out the truth.
I have nothing to sell; no advertising, no contracts, no corporate partners nor contributors.
Please help me by donating the amount you feel this information deserves.
Thank you for contributing to the restoration of Liberty and Freedom,
and may God bless each and every single one of you.
Media analyst, political activist and author, Mark Dice, based in San Diego, California, interviews confused California residents in a man-on-the-street 'mockumentary' and convinces them to sign a petition to "repeal the Second Amendment," taking the guns away from the "crazy right-wing extremists."
Dice also claims that in signing this petition, the signers will support making sure that "only the illegal, unregistered guns stay on the streets," allowing only the criminals to have them, seizing the legally-owned firearms of all law-abiding citizens via "door-to-door gun confiscations," thereby making us all much safer. "We're going to get the legally-registered guns off the street." "Only the police and military need to have guns," he continues, "we can trust them."
"We don't need these Tea Partiers and law-abiding citizens to own guns. That's for the police and the military. In today's society, we can trust the government to be the only people who have the weapons, and we're going to do some gun confiscations door-to-door and take them away from everybody else."
"The criminals won't turn theirs in, so they'll still have theirs," Dice explains. "Thanks for supporting that."
These are the sleeping masses who will gladly vote away your God-given right of self-preservation; those who, as Benjamin Franklin decried, would "give up essential
liberty to purchase a little temporary safety," those who "deserve
neither liberty nor safety."
Author William S. Burroughs concluded in 1991 that, “After a shooting
spree, they always want to take the guns away from the people who didn't
do it. I sure as hell wouldn't want to live in a society where the only
people allowed guns are the police and the military.”
Talk
to your neighbor. Inform them. Encourage them to do their own research and to be informed. The time has never been more necessary to have an informed, enlightened and engaged citizenry.
We must actively awaken the sleeping giant and acknowledge the absolute absurdity of men with guns
telling us that we aren't entitled to the same inherent right of
owning them for self-defense and "every terrible implement of the soldier," which founding father Tench Coxe declared was "the birthright of every American."
"A well informed citizenry is the only true repository of the public will." - Thomas Jefferson
I work very hard and spend countless hours researching and digging out the truth.
I have nothing to sell; no advertising, no contracts, no corporate partners nor contributors.
Please help me by donating the amount you feel this information deserves.
Thank you for contributing to the restoration of Liberty and Freedom,
and may God bless each and every single one of you.
