America the Battlefield: February 2013

Friday, February 22, 2013

Stewart Rhodes Speaks to Albany, New York Feb. 12 — Sets Deadline for Public Servants to Choose sides: “Are they patriots, or are they redcoats?”

Oath Keepers Founder Stewart Rhodes gave a fiery speech to approximately 3,000 New York gun owners, urging them to refuse to comply to the “SAFE Act,” to refuse to disarm, to nullify at every level.

He also urged them to make sure their county was a “Molon Labe” county, asking them “is your county a ‘come and take it’ county, or is it a ‘bend over and take it’ county? Which is it?! Find out now!” He told them to make sure all the gun owners and veterans in their county are ready to stand up, and will commit to refuse to comply, and then go to the sheriff and the police chief of their town and put them on notice that they are expected to choose sides.

“Is your county a ‘come and take it’ county, or is it a ‘bend over and take it’ county? Which is it?! Find out now!”

He told the crowd to use April 19, 2013, the upcoming anniversary of the battle of Lexington and Concord, in 1775, as the deadline for their sheriff, police chiefs [and all other oath sworn public servants] to choose sides — “Are they patriots, or are they redcoats?” at the rally Oath Keepers had the effigies of Cuomo, Schumer, Bloomberg, and other oath-breaking traitors dressed up in red coats, with signs hanging around their necks saying “Oath Breaker,” “Red Coat” and “Traitor”.

“Are they patriots, or are they redcoats?”

Then, retired New York State Police (Highway Patrol) officer John Wallace, a member of Oath Keepers, led thousands of New Yorkers in an oath renewal/oath taking ceremony, pledging to defend the Constitution and to not disarm.

The following video contains the beginning of the speech:

I work very hard and spend countless hours researching and digging out the truth. I have nothing to sell; no advertising, no contracts, no corporate partners nor contributors. Please help me by donating the amount you feel this information deserves. Thank you for contributing to the restoration of Liberty and Freedom, and may God bless each and every single one of you.

Thursday, February 21, 2013

16-Year-Old High School Student Alec Scheer to President Obama, "Your Internet Tyranny Will Fail"

President Obama, your internet tyranny will fail
Reposted from: We Are 1776
By: Alec Scheer
February 12, 2013

President Obama,

The Hill has reported that you are expected to release an executive order regarding cyber-security. Your Administration’s spokesperson stated, “You know that the President believes that cybersecurity is a very important issue. It represents a huge challenge for our country. He has called on Congress to take action. Unfortunately, Congress has thus far refused legislatively.”

It is my duty, as an American citizen – and as a student who has a full life ahead of him in this nation – to inform you that you are drastically violating your oath to the Constitution. When the Founders drafted the Constitution, they left the legislating power in Congress for a reason: To prevent would be dictators and tyrants. They knew all too well that when one man has the sole ability to decide what is best for a nation and its people, that the nation would be propelled into despotism. Having said this, I would like to simply point out that you can’t bypass Congress for whatever convenient excuse you have. I would think this basic concept is rather easy for you to grasp. After all, you are a Constitutional law graduate from Harvard. Knowing that you have an extensive understanding of the Constitution, your habit of constantly signing executive orders for what you want done, when Congress doesn’t do it, just further shows that you are blatantly violating the Constitution and the rights of individuals in this county.

“The order is expected to establish a critical infrastructure cybersecurity council manned by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, staffed by members of the departments of defense, justice and commerce, and national intelligence office, according a preliminary draft leaked in September,” USA Today reported.

You have a sick humor. You expect Americans to pay to spy on themselves by taxing the hell out of them. Moreover, you expect them to pay to have your Administration infringe on their privacy rights. Furthermore, from a Constitutional and free market position, you are expanding the government with yet another agency to supposedly “protect” Americans. In my opinion, the best protection you can offer the people you’re supposed to represent is by relinquishing your power. Now obviously, this is just my wishful thinking. I know that despots never relinquish their power until the nation’s people relinquish it for them. Furthermore, by creating another agency – which expends more tax dollars into more big government programs – you are depriving the people of the resources they need to purchase goods from producers; and you are depriving entrepreneurs from the funds they need to either produce or invest in more capital, which generally employs more people and expands the economy.

My last concern is basic: Why do you feel the need to monitor and regulate the internet? I know your excuse is for “security,” however, this seems to be the standard excuse which every tyrant uses, along with “it’s for your safety.” Both you and Bush Junior have justified the molestation performed by the Transportation Security Administration on innocent American travelers with excuse of “it’s for the betterment of our national security” and “it’s for your safety.” Thus it is hard for me to believe that your cyber-security initiative will actually offer security and protection. In fact, there is a 100% chance that this supposed “security” program will, in fact, become a right infringing program.

The last thing I have to say to you is: Stop the drone killings, stop destroying our freedom and our economy, stop the murders you have allowed occur in foreign lands, and stop expanding the institution which holds a monopoly on force. This, of course, would require you to relinquish your power.

Remember, Americans are growing tired of your dictatorial actions. If you continue on down this road, I can’t promise you that people will retain their anger. Your actions will inevitably lead to an uprising, just as the actions of past dictators led to uprisings.

From a pissed off high school student,

Alec Scheer,

Founder of We Are 1776

Democide: Socialism, Tyranny, Guns and Freedom

Matt Bracken is an acclaimed author, a knowledgeable realist, and a former U.S. Navy SEAL who understands history, and acknowledges when history is repeating itself.

Bracken: Democide
By: Matt Bracken
Western Rifle Shooters Association
Posted on February 20, 2013

Democide: Socialism, Tyranny, Guns and Freedom

Democide is the elimination of a despised group by a government. It includes genocide, politicide, and other forms of state-sponsored mass murder. The hated minority headed for extermination may be defined by religious, racial, political, class, cultural or other attributes. Between 200 and 260 million people were the victims of democide in the 20th century, several times more than were killed in international wars during that period.

The first widely studied modern democide occurred in Turkey between 1915 and 1923, when the Turkish government decided to eliminate the country’s Christian minority, primarily ethnic Armenians and Greeks who had Turkish roots extending back to before the Islamic conquest. Two million Christians were murdered on forced marches into deserts without water or food. This democide occurred in view of Western reporters, who took photographs and posted contemporary wire reports. The fact that the democide was known outside Turkey did not deter the Turkish leaders.

The Armenian Genocide, as it has become known, was also widely known inside Turkey, where the majority Muslim population either supported or at least passively tolerated the democide. It was impossible to miss the sight of thousands of Christians at a time being rounded up and force-marched through towns and into the burning deserts on one-way trips.

Stalin and Hitler both noticed the lack of world reaction to the democide of Turkish Christians and planned accordingly. In the Soviet Union, Stalin’s henchmen purged millions of “kulaks” (farmers deemed to have too much wealth), intellectuals, businessmen, and anyone who had ever traveled outside the USSR or even had had contact with foreigners.

In Germany and Nazi-occupied Europe, Hitler proceeded with his own “final solution to the Jewish problem.” Where the German national socialists simply eliminated Jews as quickly as possible in mass graves and gas chambers, Stalin’s international socialists deported their “class enemies” to Siberia, where they were put to work in Gulag slave-labor camps, with years of torture through cold, malnutrition and brutal working conditions preceding the release of eventual death.

Stalin also devised another means of democide when he ordered the forced starvation of the Ukrainians, and five million more innocent victims were added to his totals. In Communist China seventy million people were the victims of democide, murdered by overwork in slave-labor camps, by direct execution, and by regional forced starvation. Millions more were victims of democide in Pakistan, Cambodia, Rwanda, North Korea, and many other countries.

Democide, as the name implies, does not happen in the dark of night without any awareness of it in the country where it occurs. The Turks knew the Christians were being mass murdered. Average Germans were fully aware of what was happening to the Jews between 1938 and 1945, and a large majority either actively supported or at least tolerated it. (I strongly recommend reading Hitler’s Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust, by Daniel Goldhagen, to fully appreciate the wholehearted German support for the Jewish democide.)

Today, we sometimes hear that the Second Amendment has outlived its usefulness, that it is a relic of our barbaric past and is no longer needed in the modern era. Horrific mass shootings by deranged individuals are cited as the primary reason for Americans to surrender their most effective firearms and rely solely on a state monopoly of force for their protection. This government-dependent attitude is shortsighted, historically ignorant, and extremely dangerous.

In each of the cases cited above, a necessary preliminary step on the road to democide was the confiscation of privately owned firearms. In Turkey, “reasonable” gun control laws enacted in 1911 permitted the democide of two million Turkish Christians a few years later. In Germany, the “commonsense” 1928 gun control laws of the Weimar Republic preceded Hitler’s Holocaust by a decade.

The Weimar politicians did not intend for their gun control laws to lead to the slaughter of millions of people, but it is an historical fact that those gun control laws permitted the Nazis to carry out their Holocaust. How? By making it economically and militarily feasible to round up and mass murder entire towns without any significant resistance.

In fact, the Nazis quickly learned that they needed only a hundred ordinary military policemen to exterminate towns of a thousand Polish Jews in a single day. Contrast that fact with the Warsaw Ghetto uprising. If the Jews had not first been disarmed, using previous gun registration lists as a map for confiscation, the Holocaust would not have been possible.

Likewise in the Soviet Union and in every other case, democide was preceded by “reasonable and commonsense” firearms registration, followed eventually by gun confiscation and then by the extermination of a despised minority population.

During the past two centuries, while America has avoided tyranny, Turkey, Germany, Russia and the other nations mentioned above have spasmodically lurched between monarchs, democratically elected leaders, and often quite popular dictators, allowing them frequent opportunities to commit democide against their unwanted minorities.

The situation is fundamentally different in America, because we have a centuries-old tradition of private firearms ownership guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the Constitution. The Second Amendment does not “grant” us this right; it puts into writing our God-given natural right to effective self-defense, including armed defense against tyranny.

“Pure democracy” has been described as two wolves and a sheep voting on their dinner plans. The two wolves might see this election as an expression of their highest democratic values, but for the outnumbered sheep, pure democracy is highly problematic. On the other hand, a republic has been described as two wolves and a well-armed sheep voting on dinner plans. The well-armed sheep can veto the outcome of the dinner election simply by brandishing its firearm. The sheep has inherent rights as a sovereign individual, including the right to self-defense, a right that cannot be stripped away by a simple majority vote.

So, when a democratically elected American president speaks of “fundamentally transforming” his country, and of his need to act outside the constitutional framework, the population should be on guard. When that leader begins to push for strict new “commonsense and reasonable” gun control laws, including national firearms registration in the name of “public safety,” the citizenry should be on high alert.

Can any glib politician, pundit or ivory tower academic give us an ironclad guarantee that tyranny will never arise in the United States? Not even a popular tyranny, like those of Ataturk, Stalin, Hitler or Mao? Can anyone assure us that today’s “commonsense” gun registration lists will not be used for future gun confiscation? Of course not.

The future may be unknowable, but history is well understood, and American gun owners know and understand the history of democide in the 20th century. That is why they will never accede to what is currently portrayed in the predominantly left-wing mainstream media as “commonsense and reasonable” new gun control laws.

While American gun owners lament and regret the inescapable fact that deranged individuals in a free country may on rare occasions murder a dozen or a score of unarmed victims, they also understand that government democide murders by the million. And in every case, tyrants can conduct these democides only after disarming their unwanted minorities, rendering them helpless to resist murderous government pogroms.

American gun owners will never permit this historical pattern to be repeated in their country, because they understand that the government’s heavy hand will be kept in check only as long as they are armed. Ask yourself: Were the Armenians, the Jews or the kulaks treated better, or worse, after they were disarmed and rendered helpless by their oppressors, who thereafter held an absolute government monopoly on armed violence? The answer is too obvious to require elaboration.

Naive utopians and other “low-information voters” might not understand the historical pattern, and we don’t expect them to bother to learn it. Cynical and dishonest “progressives” who do understand the historical pattern cannot yet reveal their ultimate goal of creating a disarmed and helpless American citizenry. Nevertheless, millions of Americans understand their hidden aim with crystal clarity, seeing through the false sincerity of power-hungry leftist politicians who are actually Marxist wolves dressed in Democrat sheep’s clothing—for now.

But unless and until these secret Stalinists and sundry other “progressives” can figure out a way to disarm Americans, they cannot execute their historically standard final solution to the “reactionaries-standing-in-the-way-of-utopia” problem. And this is a thorny problem for them, because tens of millions of Americans, disbelieving their deceitful bromides, will stick to their guns no matter what.

Unlike the Armenians, Jews, kulaks and other exterminated peoples, Americans who support the Second Amendment will never be disarmed quietly by government edict prior to meekly boarding a train to a socialist “reeducation” camp. They will not be taken at government gunpoint on a one-way forced march into a desert or a Zyklon-B “delousing shower,” simply because they foolishly agreed to be disarmed by their future oppressors in the dubious name of “public safety.”

If American “progressives” truly intend to disarm the American people, they will have to do it the hard way, by taking their bullets first, one at a time. As the 300 Spartans announced to the vastly larger Persian army at Thermopylae, “Molon Labe!”

You want our guns? Then come and take them!

No registration—no confiscation—no extermination!

Freedom now, freedom forever!
I work very hard and spend countless hours researching and digging out the truth. I have nothing to sell; no advertising, no contracts, no corporate partners nor contributors. Please help me by donating the amount you feel this information deserves. Thank you for contributing to the restoration of Liberty and Freedom, and may God bless each and every single one of you.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren to Federal Bank Regulators: "Too Big to Fail has become Too Big for Trial?"

Senator Elizabeth Warren asks federal bank regulators why no banks were taken to trial in the aftermath of the financial crisis.

This video is powerful and could be an effective tool for waking up more uninformed Americans to what we face economically. It’s an absolute joke that the people being questioned by Senator Elizabeth Warren are tasked with holding the banks accountable for their high crimes of economic tyranny. Furthermore, those little placards in front of them that declare each respective designate “honorable” is a shameful irony. These people have no honor.

The joke’s on us.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren also makes the key point how ordinary citizens are constantly harassed by the “authorities” for what are in many cases petty and victimless crimes, while the bankers who have unleashed more widespread destruction than anyone else, get slapped on the wrist.

"I'm really concerned that too big to fail has become too big for trial," she told the heads of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Commission and top officials from other agencies.

"Now, I know there have been some landmark settlements," Warren said. "But we face some very special issues with big financial institutions. If they can break the law and drag in billions in profits and then turn around and settle, paying out of those profits, they don't have much incentive to follow the law.

"So the question I really want to ask is about how tough you are," she continued. "About how much leverage you really have in these settlements. And what I'd like to know is, tell me a little bit about the last few times you've taken the biggest financial institutions on Wall Street all the way to a trial."

The question drew some applause from the audience in the hearing room. And the seven regulators did not seem eager to answer.

"Anyone else want to tell me about the last time you took a Wall Street bank to trial?" Warren said.

When none of them initially volunteered, Warren asked, "Anybody?"

Every single American should watch this short clip:

Friday, February 15, 2013

The Criminalization of Law-Abiding Gun Owners: Missouri Democrats Introduce Legislation Giving Residents 90 Days to Turn In Their Legally-Owned Firearms

Missouri Democrats introduced an anti-gun bill which would turn law-abiding firearm owners into criminals. They will have 90 days to turn in their guns if the legislation is passed.

Dana Loesch Radio reported on the new legislation being pushed by Missouri Democrats:

Any person who, prior to the effective date of this law, was legally in possession of an assault weapon or large capacity magazine shall have ninety days from such effective date to do any of the following without being subject to prosecution.

Here’s part of the Democratic proposal in Missouri:

4. Any person who, prior to the effective date of this law, was legally in possession of an assault weapon or large capacity magazine shall have ninety days from such effective date to do any of the following without being subject to prosecution:

(1) Remove the assault weapon or large capacity magazine from the state of Missouri;

(2) Render the assault weapon permanently inoperable; or

(3) Surrender the assault weapon or large capacity magazine to the appropriate law enforcement agency for destruction, subject to specific agency regulations.

5. Unlawful manufacture, import, possession, purchase, sale, or transfer of an assault weapon or a large capacity magazine is a class C felony.

It’s not just Missouri. Minnesota democrats have also introduced a law to confiscate guns using the same language as Missouri democrats.

The introduction of these bills follow several other anti-gun bills throughout the country, with the most notable being in New York. Last month, the state of New York passed the most restrictive gun control legislation in the country, criminalizing “assault” rifles and magazines that hold more than seven rounds, as well as requiring background checks for all private purchases and attempting to strengthen the mental health system.

Members of the California legislature have further moved to criminalize firearms by outdoing New York, proposing a ban on all semi-automatic guns with detachable magazines.

If you haven't figured it out yet, the communist party infiltrated the democratic party decades ago. The communist party knew that the American people would never knowingly vote for them. Instead, the communists became democrats, and the strategy is working.

"The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened... I no longer need to run as a presidential candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democrat Party has adopted our platform." — Norman Thomas, 6-time presidential candidate of the American Socialist Party

Socialism is the vehicle of communism. It always has been. And the first agenda of a communist takeover is to disarm the civilian population of the targeted country.

Incidentally, all devoted communists are satanists by their own admission, who practice occultism. Karl Marx was a satanist who promoted communism as the way to destroy Christianity. In truth, communism has absolutely nothing to do with the redistribution of wealth. That's a ruse. The true purpose of communism is the destruction of the Christian church.

Adolf Hitler and his socialist revolutionaries were occultists and devoted satanists.

The communist movement is essentially the political arm if the church of satan.

Emperors have tried to destroy Christians. Philosophies have tried to stamp them out. Tyrants have tried to wash them from the face of the earth with the very blood of those who claimed their Christian faith. Yet, they still stand.

A warning to the police and military:
Gun control always proceeds tyranny and despotism, and the history of socialism and communism ultimately declares that every uniformed enforcer who helps the usurpers come to power, are historically the first people to be eliminated, once the controllers have welded the final chains in place.

The uniformed enforcement arm (military and police) who go along with tyranny and are traitors to their country, are the greatest threat to the usurping power structure in the end. Because, if they go against the Constitution, the Magna Carta, or common law now, then they will surely go against communism later.

Ye shall know them by their fruits. (Matthew 7:16)

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Dear Sir, What Will You Do? Letter to My Former U.S. Marine Commander

Dear Sir,

Our mutual friend who we served with together can no longer get ahold of you. Nor can I reach you anymore. You have even hung up on our phone calls of late.

I can only surmise that you have finally come to the conclusion that the rest of us on the outside, who are not compartmentalized, arrived at some time ago.

Can I deduce that it's because of the true reason the current administration is purging military commanders?

We have known for a long time that the agenda of this regime is to disarm the civilian population of America at the behest of their Marxist/communist controllers, namely in China, Russia, and Saudi Arabia.

But why disarm us? Because as Admiral Yamamoto told Japan's military leaders when advising them of the futility of an invasion of mainland United States because of the widespread availability of guns, "You cannot invade mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass."

Our armed citizenry, being necessary to the security of a free State, is the last line of defense against a tyrannical invasion force.

Countless foreign governments are calling for our government to disarm us, by force if necessary. And it will fall upon the shoulders of the ranks of our military and police to enforce these illegitimate (illegal) edicts.

Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn, a Russian writer, dissident, activist and author of 'The Gulag Archipelago' (1973), had something to say about this:

"And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if... We didn't love freedom enough. And even more―we had no awareness of the real situation... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward."

These are the times that try men's souls, the time to get on the right side of history, the time to draw our line in the sand and pledge to rather die as free men than to live as slaves.

The written historical record reveals to us that everyone who went along with tyranny―whether out of fear or out of personal gain―it didn't go well for them at all in the end. When the Berlin Wall fell, the dreaded East German Stasi secret police ripped their uniform badges off in shame, fled, and went into hiding. The despotic Nazi commanders were convicted of their atrocities at the Nuremberg tribunals. Following the illegal orders of their superiors was not a credible defense.

I understand the choice that is before you; the struggle you face―to acquiesce to the forces of darkness, or to stand for Liberty. Benjamin Franklin said that those who sacrifice Liberty on the altar of security, deserve neither Liberty nor security.

And Patrick Henry asked, "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!"

Samuel Adams decried those who served the system of enslavement: "If ye love wealth better than Liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animating contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen!"

The current gun control agenda is a recipe for enslavement, as it has so been in every tyrannical government and ruling class throughout history that disarmed its people to enslave them. Slaves cannot be armed, only free men. "To disarm the people is the best and most effective way to enslave them" ― George Mason

"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty," Patrick Henry warned in his speech to the Virginia Ratifying Convention of 1788, "Suspect EVERYONE who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined."

The system will require the blood, sweat, and tears of you and your fellow active duty Marines in order to carry out what they have planned for us. It will require you to commit treason against your God, your Republic, your Constitution, and against your fellow man. It won't be called treason, though. For, as Sir John Harington pointed out, "Treason doth never prosper: what's the reason? Why, if it prosper, none dare call it treason."

No, it won't be called treason. It will be called DUTY.

The system will not just require treason; it will require atrocity. It will require you to carry out atrocities at home, the likes of which our fighting men were forced to carry out abroad, in every clime and place, for the profit of the few.

Then, once the system has used you as the enforcement arm of tyranny, it will surely chew you up and spit you out. It will label you, a returning veteran, a "domestic terrorist threat", as it has labeled me and my fellow veterans who served with honor. It will then deny you healthcare, as it has to hundreds of thousands of suffering veterans.

Military men, as Henry Kissinger stated, are "dumb animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy." However, when these cleptocrats entertain the notion of considering you as dumb animals to be used as pawns in DOMESTIC policy, then we have a serious problem on our hands.

And to every Soldier, Sailor, Airman, Marine and Coastguardsman who gave voice and effort to producing all of the recent military and academic think-tank documents that label their fellow veterans as "anti-federalists", "rightwing extremists", "domestic terrorists", and a "threat to national security", shame is upon them, and judgement will come swiftly.

You know very well why the current regime is purging Constitutional commanders. Have you received the "litmus test" yet that Army Lieutenant General William G. "Jerry" Boykin (retired) is going public about? He was the United States Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence, one of our highest decorated combat veterans, and is exposing the treason that is taking place at the highest office of our captured government.

In January of this year, world-renowned educator, human rights activist, and Nobel Peace Prize nominee, Jim Garrow, exposed how President Obama is using a new litmus test for "determining who will stay and who must go" among top-ranked military leaders. That test is whether or not they will fire on American citizens when ordered to do so. Garrow says that his source made the disclosure in order to "sound the alarm" over the administration's plans. His source, we now know, is Lieutenant General William G. Boykin.
Jim Garrow posted on his Facebook page on January 21, 2013:

"I have just been informed by a former senior military leader that Obama is using a new 'litmus test' in determining who will stay and who must go in his military leaders. Get ready to explode folks. 'The new litmus test of leadership in the military is if they will fire on US citizens or not'. Those who will not are being removed."

The word on the street is that Barack Obama is also pushing yet another high-ranking military official out of his post, General James N. "Mad Dog" Mattis, USMC, commander of United States Central Command (USCENTCOM). Gen. Mattis is reportedly asking too many questions. He is being pushed out for addressing skepticism about the treasonous litmus test and for acknowledging the "blowback" from our disastrous, self-destructive foreign policy. General Boykin, General Petraeus, General Ham, and now General Mattis.

Not to mention, you might recall Barack Obama speaking in 2008, advocating the need for creating a "Civilian National Security Force" rivaling the military in size and strength, a military which he can obviously no longer trust to carry out his Marxist/communist agenda:

Is that why you remain silent―because you're realizing the hard truth, that if you defy the will of the regime, that you will lose your career; that if you declare you will not follow orders to fire on patriots like me, you will be pushed out? You have by now realized that your orders will in fact be to fire on your fellow Americans who refuse to disarm. Your fellow veterans. Your fellow gun owners. Your fellow man. If your family refuses to disarm and be enslaved, will you fire upon them?

I'll tell you what I told my County Sheriff, we're with you. You have our support, 100%. But, ONLY if you honor your sworn Oath and disobey the illegal orders you will surely be given. If you don't, then you might as well go ahead and rip your uniform badges, rank insignia and medals off in shame, flee, and go into hiding.

You may as well retire now, take off your uniform, and stand with us. Stand with We the People. Use your training to defend Liberty, instead of using it to strip our God-given Rights.

The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone. It is to the vigilant, the active, the brave.

Now is the time for bravery; to do the difficult thing. I don't envy you the test that you face, the tough decision that is before you.

In closing, the Second Amendment does not GIVE us the right to keep and bear arms. It recognizes it, points it out, highlights it, enumerates it, and guarantees it. The Second Amendment guarantees the natural right of self-defense; the right to defend life, liberty and property; the God-given right which the framers of our Constitution declared to be "NECESSARY to the security of a free State"; the right which "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED", so long as we are free.

In his 'An Examination into the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution' (1787), Noah Webster wrote, "The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any bands of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States."

That is why we must be disarmed in the eyes of a lawless criminal government and their foreign collaborators, so they can then inflict the unjust "laws" planned against us, unhindered by the supreme power of arms that we currently possess, the arms which hold their tyranny at bay. The other reason is so we pose no significant force of arms to repel the foreign dictatorial empires that have purchased the majority of our debt, and will want a return on their investment.

If America is barred the use of arms, then the rest of our rights will soon follow. Our natural rights will then be taken by force, because we will then be defenseless against a government that has removed its mask; a government that has shown its true face, which is as George Washington warned, a government that "is not reason; it is not eloquence. It is force. And force like fire is a dangerous servant and a fearful master."

Alexander Hamilton wrote in The Federalist #28:

"If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no recourse left but in the exertion of that original right of self defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government."

And that original right of self defense will be engaged with over 500 million firearms, and "every other terrible implement of the soldier," as Tench Coxe declared in 1788, "are the birth-right of every American."

The representatives of We the People, those giving you your orders, have betrayed their constituents by their own admission. They have already given their confession of evil in their own published works and spoken word. They have also given over command of our military to the UN and NATO.

And the usurpers of our Republic, the criminal class that has hijacked our nation through fraud and overthrown our Constitution and Bill of Rights, will soon give the ultimate order of betrayal for the military commanders to follow―to steal our birth-right and subsequently enslave us.

History shows that this happens in every single civilization which becomes lawless, filled with iniquity, given over to reprobate minds, and which attempts to nullify, vilify and criminalize its inherently honorable civilian population under despotic rule.

When the defense of liberty becomes a crime, tyranny is already in force. At that point, failure to defend liberty makes slavery a certainty.

Edmund Burke said that "the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” However, in this case, doing nothing, when the order is given to fire on your fellow Americans, will not weigh on your spirit as much as doing the something that will be expected of you―as doing that something will surely bring about a shame upon you to rival that of any force of deplorable evil the mind can conjure from centuries past.

When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn. (Proverbs 29:2)

When that order is given, sir, what will you do?

Friday, February 8, 2013

Florida Highway Patrol Announces Illegal Highway Checkpoints

Yes, you read that right.

The Florida Highway Patrol (Troop C: Hillsborough, Pinellas, Polk, Pasco, Hernando, Sumter and Citrus counties) has announced plans to set-up highway checkpoints to target drivers to inspect their drivers license, insurance, and vehicles in February. FHP says the checkpoints will be conducted during daytime hours.

This Feb. 2, 2013 ABC Action News article has a list of all affected roads: http://www.abcactionnews.com/dpp/traffic/traffic_news/fhp-announces-daytime-driver-license-vehicle-inspection-checkpoints

The question on every Floridians' mind is: "Is this legal?"

The answer is: "No, it is not legal. It is a Policy."

Not only does this policy expressly violate Florida statutes, it also violates the Constitution of the State of Florida, and the Constitution of the United States of America.

I attached the corresponding text at the bottom of this blog, which lists the three legal precedents violated by this policy.

I have advised all of my family and friends to print this information out and keep it in their car in case they are subjected to an unreasonable search and seizure that violates the Rule of Law and their unalienable Rights as enumerated.

"You have Rights antecedent to all earthly governments: Rights, that cannot be repealed or restrained by human laws; Rights, derived from the Great Legislator of the universe." — John Adams

“Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined.” — Patrick Henry

“Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will. Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have found out the exact measure of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them, and these will continue till they are resisted with either words or blows, or both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress.” — Frederick Douglass

“Single acts of tyranny may be ascribed to the accidental opinion of a day; but a series of oppressions, begun at a distinguished period and pursued unalterably through every change of ministers, too plainly prove a deliberate, systematic plan of reducing a people to slavery.” — Thomas Jefferson

"The only sure bulwark of continuing liberty is a government strong enough to protect the interests of the people, and a people strong enough and well enough informed to maintain its sovereign control over the government." — Franklin D. Roosevelt

We the People must defend our rights. Or one day we will wake up having none, and our children and our grandchildren will inherit despotism, and may never know the blessings of Liberty. Death by a thousand cuts, it's called. Incrementalism; creeping normalcy, the way a major change is accepted as the normal situation. But only if it happens slowly, in unnoticed increments, when it would be regarded as objectionable if it took place in a single step or over a short period of time.

These are the four reasons why the American people are allowing our Liberty to be overthrown by enemies foreign and domestic:

If you don't know what they mean, please look them up, so that you can avoid falling into their trap.

"My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge." (Hosea 4:6)

Government originates and derives its power from the People, and as such exists only with the consent of the governed. When government becomes a self-serving means to its own objectives—when it becomes as George Washington warned, "a dangerous servant and a fearful master,"—it then ceases to be government and becomes a criminal entity serving its own self interest at the expense of the very people it is sworn to represent. At such time the People have an obligation to put aside differences and put down such a criminal tyranny by all necessary means and restore the freedoms of the People and of the Republic as clearly defined in our Constitution, Bill of Rights, The Declaration of Independence, and the Articles of Confederation.

Recognize that any law which violates these principles is null and void from inception. The Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison 5 U.S. 137 (1803) ruled that "All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Furthermore, the People have an obligation not only to ignore such laws, but to actively overturn them by any and all means. Those that support such illegal laws, actions, and objectives are guilty of treason, by definition, at the very least, and must be held accountable for their actions. As you know, treason is a crime prohibited by legislation passed by Congress. The United States Code 18 U.S.C. § 2381 states, "whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies… is guilty of treason." Likewise, Presidential executive orders, by their very nature are illegal, treasonous, and are null and void from inception.

These revenue-generating highway checkpoints are similarly illegal, are repugnant to Florida Statute Title XXIII, 316.60, the Constitution of the State of Florida, and the the Constitution of the United states, and are therefore null and void from inception.

As for our elected representatives in Florida, it is your duty to defend the people of your State from illegal actions by those under your supervision. As a citizen of the United states of America, I am your constituent and I respectfully request that you take immediate action to stop this abuse of civil rights.

Represent us!

Thank you in advance for honoring your Oath to the Constitution of the State of Florida and the Constitution of the United States of America.

"Papers, please."

The 2012 Florida Statutes

Title XXIII
MOTOR VEHICLES
Chapter 316
STATE UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL

316.610 Safety of vehicle; inspection. — It is a violation of this chapter for any person to drive or move, or for the owner or his or her duly authorized representative to cause or knowingly permit to be driven or moved, on any highway any vehicle or combination of vehicles which is in such unsafe condition as to endanger any person or property, or which does not contain those parts or is not at all times equipped with such lamps and other equipment in proper condition and adjustment as required in this chapter, or which is equipped in any manner in violation of this chapter, or for any person to do any act forbidden or fail to perform any act required under this chapter.

(1) Any police officer may at any time, upon reasonable cause to believe that a vehicle is unsafe or not equipped as required by law, or that its equipment is not in proper adjustment or repair, require the driver of the vehicle to stop and submit the vehicle to an inspection and such test with reference thereto as may be appropriate.

(2) In the event the vehicle is found to be in unsafe condition or any required part or equipment is not present or is not in proper repair and adjustment, and the continued operation would probably present an unduly hazardous operating condition, the officer may require the vehicle to be immediately repaired or removed from use. However, if continuous operation would not present unduly hazardous operating conditions, that is, in the case of equipment defects such as tailpipes, mufflers, windshield wipers, marginally worn tires, the officer shall give written notice to require proper repair and adjustment of same within 48 hours, excluding Sunday.

History. — s. 1, ch. 71-135; s. 1, ch. 76-31; s. 1, ch. 78-112; s. 24, ch. 83-216; s. 7, ch. 83-298; s. 328, ch. 95-148; s. 17, ch. 2003-286.

Note. — Former s. 316.285.

Constitution of the State of Florida
As revised in 1968 and subsequently amended

SECTION 9. Due process. — No person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law, or be twice put in jeopardy for the same offense, or be compelled in any criminal matter to be a witness against oneself.

History. — Am. proposed by Constitution Revision Commission, Revision No. 13, 1998, filed with the Secretary of State May 5, 1998; adopted 1998.

SECTION 12. Searches and seizures. — The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures, and against the unreasonable interception of private communications by any means, shall not be violated. No warrant shall be issued except upon probable cause, supported by affidavit, particularly describing the place or places to be searched, the person or persons, thing or things to be seized, the communication to be intercepted, and the nature of evidence to be obtained. This right shall be construed in conformity with the 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution, as interpreted by the United States Supreme Court. Articles or information obtained in violation of this right shall not be admissible in evidence if such articles or information would be inadmissible under decisions of the United States Supreme Court construing the 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution.

History. — Am. H.J.R. 31-H, 1982; adopted 1982.

SECTION 23. Right of privacy. — Every natural person has the right to be let alone and free from governmental intrusion into the person’s private life except as otherwise provided herein. This section shall not be construed to limit the public’s right of access to public records and meetings as provided by law.

History. — Added, C.S. for H.J.R. 387, 1980; adopted 1980; Am. proposed by Constitution Revision Commission, Revision No. 13, 1998, filed with the Secretary of State May 5, 1998; adopted 1998.

U.S. Constitution

Amendment 4. Search and Seizure

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Amendment 5. Trial and Punishment, Compensation for Takings

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
I work very hard and spend countless hours researching and digging out the truth. I have nothing to sell; no advertising, no contracts, no corporate partners nor contributors. Please help me by donating the amount you feel this information deserves. Thank you for contributing to the restoration of Liberty and Freedom, and may God bless each and every single one of you.